首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The high unemployment rates of the early 1960s occasioned a spirited debate with in the economics profession. One group found th
The high unemployment rates of the early 1960s occasioned a spirited debate with in the economics profession. One group found th
admin
2013-01-29
26
问题
The high unemployment rates of the early 1960s occasioned a spirited debate with in the economics profession. One group found the primary cause of unemployment in slow growth and the solution in economic expansion. The other found the major explanation in changes that had occurred in the supply and demand for labor and stressed measures for matching demand with supply.
The expansionist school of thought, with the Council of Economic Advisers as its leading advocates, attributed the persistently high unemployment level to a slow rate of economic growth resulting from a deficiency of aggregate demand for goods and services. The majority of this school endorsed the position of the Council that tax reduction would eventually reduce the unemployment level to 4% of the labor force with no other assistance. At 4%, bottlenecks in skilled labor, middle-level manpower, and professional personnel were expected to retard growth and generate wage-price pressures. To go beyond 4%, the interim goal of the Council, it was recognized that improved education, training and retraining, and other structural measures would be required. Some expansionists insisted that the demand for goods and services was nearly satiated’ and that it was impossible for the private sector to absorb a significant increase in output. In their estimate, only the lower-income fifth of the population and the public sector offered sufficient outlets for the productive efforts of the potential labor force. The fact that the needs of the poor and the many unmet demands for public services held higher priority than the demands of the marketplace in the value structure of this group no doubt influenced their economic judgments.
Those who found the major cause of unemployment in structural features were primarily labor economists, concerned professionally with efficient functioning of labor markets through programs to develop skills and place individual workers. They maintained that increased aggregate demand was a necessary but not sufficient condition for reaching either the CEA’s 4% target or their own preferred 3%. This pessimism was based in part on the conclusion that unemployment among the young, the unskilled, minority groups, and depressed geographical areas is not easily attacked by increasing general demand. Further, their estimate of the numbers of potential members of the labor force who had withdrawn or not entered because of lack of employment opportunity was substantially higher than that of the CEA. They also projected that increased demand would put added pressure on skills already in short supply rather than employ the unemployed, and that because of technological change, which was replacing manpower, much higher levels of demand would be necessary to create the same number of jobs.
The structural school, too, had its hyperenthusiasts: Fiscal conservatives who, as an alternative to expansionary policies, argued the not very plausible position that a job was available for every person, provided only that he or she had the requisite skills or would relocate. Such extremist positions aside, there was actually considerable agreement between two main groups, though this was not recognized at the time. Both realized the advisability of a tax cut to increase demand, and both needed to reduce unemployment below a point around 4%. In either case, the policy implications differed in emphasis and not in content.
The author discounts the value of the expansionists’ judgment by pointing out that it
选项
A、was not borne out with sufficient information
B、was colored by their political viewpoint
C、was not made from a professional point of view
D、was deemed to be impractical and thus incorrect
答案
B
解析
判断推理。文章指出,事实上,穷人的需求和公用业务的未被满足的需求,比这一群体的价值结构对市场的需求的优先级要高,毫无疑问,这一因素直接影响了他们的经济判断能力。故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ne1O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Chinaisintheprocessofbuildingasocialistharmonioussociety(社会主义和谐社会)forthetimebeing.Writeacompositionofnoless
Asiftheydidn’thavetheirhandsfullwithIraqandterrorism,U.S.intelligenceagenciesarebeingdrawnintothedebateove
Asiftheydidn’thavetheirhandsfullwithIraqandterrorism,U.S.intelligenceagenciesarebeingdrawnintothedebateove
Thereweretwowidelydivergentinfluencesontheearlydevelopmentofstatisticalmethods.Statisticshadamotherwhowasdedi
71.ThemainimpressiongrowingoutoftwelveyearsonthefacultyofmedicalschoolisthattheNo.1healthproblemintheU.S.
Towhatextentaretheunemployedfailingintheirdutytosocietytowork,andhowfarhastheStateanobligationtoensureth
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallygoodscienceitisimpossibletopredict.Ifthethi
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherinthelaboratorywouldsubmittheresultsoftheirres
Thecurrentpoliticaldebateoverfamilyvaluespersonalresponsibility,andwelfaretakesforgrantedtheentrenchedAmericanb
Ineconomics,demandimpliessomethingslightlydifferentfromthecommonmeaningoftheterm.Thelayman,forexample,oftenus
随机试题
下列说法不正确的是()
A,胸外心脏挤压B,胸内心脏挤压C,两者均可D,两者均不可易并发肋骨骨折的是
有关滤线栅的叙述,错误的是
若∫f(x)dx=x3+C,则∫f(cosx)sinxdx等于()(式中C为任意常数)。
背景材料:某高速公路第五施工合同段地处城郊,主要工程为路基填筑施工。其中K48+010~K48+328段原为路基土方填筑,因当地经济发展和交通规划需要,经各方协商,决定将该段路基填筑变更为(5×20+3×36+5×20m)预应力钢筋混凝土箱梁桥,
()不属于企业存货。
下列选项对烹饪方式的解释表述正确的是:
设f(x)连续,证明:∫0x[∫0tf(u)du]dt=∫0xf(x)(x—t)dt.
数字视频的数据量极大,对存储和传输都是极大的负担,为此必须进行数据压缩。目前DVD影视光盘上存储的数字视频采用的压缩编码标准是【】。
请在【答题】菜单下选择【进入考生文件夹】命令,并按照题目要求完成下面的操作。注意:以下的文件必须保存在考生文件夹下。文涵是大地公司的销售部助理。负责对全公司的销售情况进行统计分析,并将结果提交给销售部经理。年底,她根据各门店提交的销售报
最新回复
(
0
)