首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The future of personal satellite technology is here—are we ready for it? A) Satellites used to be the exclusive playthings of
The future of personal satellite technology is here—are we ready for it? A) Satellites used to be the exclusive playthings of
admin
2021-01-08
54
问题
The future of personal satellite technology is here—are we ready for it?
A) Satellites used to be the exclusive playthings of rich governments and wealthy corporations. But increasingly, as space becomes more democratized, they are coming within reach of ordinary people. Just like drones (无人机)before them, miniature satellites are beginning to fundamentally transform our conceptions of who gets to do what up above our heads.
B) As a recent report from the National Academy of Sciences highlights, these satellites hold tremendous potential for making satellite-based science more accessible than ever before. However, as the cost of getting your own satellite in orbit drops sharply, the risks of irresponsible use grow. The question here is no longer "Can we?" but "Should we?" What are the potential downsides of having a slice of space densely populated by equipment built by people not traditionally labeled as " professionals" ? And what would the responsible and beneficial development and use of this technology actually look like? Some of the answers may come from a nonprofit organization that has been building and launching amateur satellites for nearly 50 years.
C) Having your personal satellite launched into orbit might sound like an idea straight out of science fiction. But over the past few decades a unique class of satellites has been created that fits the bill; CubeSats. The "Cube" here simply refers to the satellite’s shape. The most common CubeSat is a 10cm cube, so small that a single CubeSat could easily be mistaken for a paperweight on your desk. These mini-satellites can fit in a launch vehicle’s formerly " wasted space. " Multiples can be deployed in combination for more complex missions than could be achieved by one CubeSat alone.
D) Within their compact bodies these minute satellites are able to house sensors and communications receivers/transmitters that enable operators to study Earth from space, as well as space around Earth. They’re primarily designed for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) —an easily accessible region of space from around 200 to 800 miles above Earth, where human-tended missions like the Hubble Space Telescope and the International Space Station (ISS) hang out. But they can attain more distant orbits; NASA plans for most of its future Earth-escaping payloads (to the moon and Mars especially) to carry CubeSats.
E) Because they’re so small and light, it costs much less to get a CubSat into Earth’s orbit than a traditional communications or GPS satellite. For instance, a research group here at Arizona State University recently claimed their developmental small CubeSats could cost as little as $3,000 to put in orbit. This decrease in cost allows researchers, hobbyists and even elementary school groups to put simple instruments into LEO or even having them deployed from the ISS.
F) The first CubeSat was created in the early 2000s, as a way of enabling Stanford graduate students to design, build, test and operate a spacecraft with similar capabilities to the USSR’s Sputnik (前苏联的人造卫星). Since then, NASA, the National Reconnaissance Office and even Boeing have all launched and operated CubeSats. There are more than 130 currently in operation. The NASA Educational Launch of Nano Satellite program, which offers free launches for educational groups and science missions, is now open to U. S. nonprofit corporations as well. Clearly, satellites are not just for rocket scientists anymore.
G) The National Academy of Sciences report emphasizes CubeSats’ importance in scientific discovery and the training of future space scientists and engineers. Yet it also acknowledges that widespread deployment of LEO CubeSats isn’t risk-free. The greatest concern the authors raise is space debris—pieces of "junk" that orbit the earth, with the potential to cause serious damage if they collide with operational units, including the ISS.
H) Currently, there aren’t many CubeSats and they’re tracked closely. Yet as LEO opens up to more amateur satellites, they may pose an increasing threat. As the report authors point out, even near-misses might lead to the " creation of a burdensome regulatory framework and affect the future disposition of science CubeSats. "
I) CubeSat researchers suggest that now’s the time to ponder unexpected and unintended possible consequences of more people than ever having access to their own small slice of space. In an era when you can simply buy a CubeSat kit off the shelf, how can we trust the satellites over our heads were developed with good intentions by people who knew what they were doing? Some "expert amateurs" in the satellite game could provide some inspiration for how to proceed responsibly.
J) In 1969, the Radio Amateur Satellite Corporation (AMSAT) was created in order to foster ham radio enthusiasts’ (业余无线电爱好者) participation in space research and communication. It continued the efforts, begun in 1961, by Project OSCAR—a U. S. -based group that built and launched the very first nongovernmental satellite just four years after Sputnik. As an organization of volunteers, AMSAT was putting "amateur" satellites in orbit decades before the current CubeSat craze. And over time, its members have learned a thing or two about responsibility. Here, open-source development has been a central principle. Within the organization, AMSAT has a philosophy of open sourcing everything—making technical data on all aspects of their satellites fully available to everyone in the organization, and when possible, the public. According to a member of the team responsible for FOX 1-A, AMSAT’s first CubeSat, this means that there’s no way to sneak something like explosives or an energy emitter into an amateur satellite when everyone has access to the designs and implementation.
K) However, they’re more cautious about sharing infoirmation with nonmembers, as the organization guards against others developing the ability to hijack and take control of their satellites. This form of "self-governance" is possible within long-standing amateur organizations that, over time, are able to build a sense of responsibility to community members, as well as society in general. But what happens when new players emerge, who don’t have deep roots within the existing culture?
L) Hobbyists and students are gaining access to technologies without being part of a long-standing amateur establishment. They’re still constrained by funders, launch providers and a series of regulations—all of which rein in what CubeSat developers can and cannot do. But there’s a danger they’re ill-equipped to think through potential unintended consequences. What these unintended consequences might be is admittedly far from clear. Yet we know innovators can be remarkably creative with taking technologies in unexpected directions. Think of something as seemingly benign as the cellphone—we have microfinance and text-based social networking at one end of the spectrum, and improvised (临时制作的) explosive devices at the other.
M) This is where a culture of social responsibility around CubeSats becomes important—not simply to ensure that physical risks are minimized, but to engage with a much larger community in anticipating and managing less obvious consequences of the technology. This is not an easy task. Yet the evidence from AMSAT and other areas of technology development suggests that responsible amateur communities can and do emerge around novel technologies. The challenge here, of course, is ensuring that what an amateur community considers to be responsible, actually is. Here’s where there needs to be a much wider public conversation that extends beyond government agencies and scientific communities to include students, hobbyists, and anyone who may potentially stand to be affected by the use of CubeSat technology.
The greater accessibility of mini-satellites increases the risks of their irresponsible use.
选项
答案
B
解析
B)段定位句提到,这些卫星具有巨大的潜力,使基于卫星的科学比以往任何时候都更容易接触。然而,随着将自己的卫星送人轨道的成本急剧下降,不负责任地使用卫星的风险也在增加。由上文可知,第一个定位句中的these satellites是指上一段最后一句中的miniature satellites,而题干中的mini-satellites与此对应,题干中的the greater accessibility对应原文中的more accessible,题干中的increases the risks of their irresponsible use是对原文中the risks of irresponsible use grow的同义转述,故答案为B)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nqP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
HowPovertyChangestheBrainA)Yousawthepicturesinscienceclass—aprofileviewofthehumanbrain,sectionedbyfuncti
Children’sHealthcareofAtlantawantstomoveGeorgiaoutofthetop10listforchildhoodobesity(肥胖),officialssaid.Doc
A、Therelationshipbetweenplayandwork.B、Theimportanceofbooks.C、Theimportanceofchildren’splay.D、Children’sspeechde
A、Thedifferentkindsofinvestments.B、Theimportanceofinvestments.C、Therisksandpotentialrewards.D、Thesumofinvestmen
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayonstressmanagement.Youressayshouldincludetheimportance
A、Theywillbemorecarefulinbuyingpresents.B、Theywilllearnhowtobudgetandinvestinthefuture.C、Theywillbemoreli
A、Itcanreducetheriskofheartdisease.B、Itcanimprovetheeffectofexercise.C、Itcanmakeusfeelhappy.D、Itcancures
Electroniccigarettesarehandheldnicotine-deliverydevicesthat,despiteadevotedfollowing,arecurrentlyswirlingincontro
A、Withoutinterventiontheywillbeaheadachetothenation.B、Withsupporttheycanbebroughtbacktoanormallife.C、Theyr
A、It’squitedifferentwhenpronouncedinFrenchandEnglish.B、TowritewithoutusingitisdifficultbothinEnglishandinF
随机试题
直肠癌根治性切除手术主要有哪几种术式?各术式之间区别的主要理论依据是什么?
某女,28岁,产后2个月,近日常感瘀阻腹痛,食积不化,应选用()。
下列有关证券发行的表述中,正确的一项是()。
下列不属于银行债券投资目标的是()。
某工业企业为增值税的一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为17%。本期购入原材料100公斤,价款为57000元(不含增值税额)。验收入库时发现短缺5%,经查属于运输途中合理损耗。该批原材料入库前的挑选整理费为380元。该批原材料的实际单位成本为每公斤(
A公司为工业生产企业的上市公司,所得税税率为25%。按季对外提供中期会计报告。从2010年起为售出产品提供“三包”服务,规定产品出售后—定期限内出现质量问题,负责退换或免费提供维修。假定A公司只生产和销售甲种产品。2011年年初“预计负债—产品质量保证”账
预估陈述报告,是通过预估而提出的一份整合事实和理论的有关案主个人,家庭及其生态系统的摘要报告。它的主要内容涉及()等方面。
在下面的VisualFoxPro表达式中,运算结果不为逻辑真的是()。
在现代的CPU芯片中又集成了高速缓冲存储器(Cache),其作用是
A、Maryislackofimagination.B、Marywillbecomeagoodteacher.C、Maryisnotacompetentteacher.D、Marycanexpressideascl
最新回复
(
0
)