2. 考研
  3. The year 1609 was noteworthy for two astronomical milestones. That was when Galileo built his first telescopes and began his met

The year 1609 was noteworthy for two astronomical milestones. That was when Galileo built his first telescopes and began his met

admin2012-06-02  47
问题     The year 1609 was noteworthy for two astronomical milestones. That was when Galileo built his first telescopes and began his meticulous study of the skies. Within months he discovered the four major satellites of Jupiter, saw that Venus (like our moon) has illuminated phases and confirmed earlier observations of sunspots — all evidence that undermined the Aristotelian model of an unchanging, Earth-centered cosmos.
    During that same year, Johannes Kepler published Astronomia Nova, which contained his detailed calculation of the orbit of Mars. It also established the first two laws of planetary motion: that planets follow elliptical orbits, with the sun at one focus, and that planets sweep through equal areas of their orbits in a given interval.
    Small wonder, then, that when the United Nations General Assembly declared an International Year of Astronomy to promote the wider appreciation of the science, it selected 2009, the quadricentennial of those standout accomplishments (among many) by Galileo and Kepler that informally founded modern astronomy.
    Currently astronomers can look beyond the familiar planets and moons to entirely new systems of worlds around other stars. As I write this, the tally stands at 344 known extrasolar planets. Only a handful of these bodies were found by telescopic means that Galileo or Kepler would have recognized, but each one owes its discovery to their work.
    A recent and surprising trend is the apparent abundance of planets turning up close to very small stars — suns that may not be much larger than the planets circling them. Astronomers Michael W. Werner and Michael A. Jura have written on why the existence of these unlikely planetary systems might imply that the universe is chock-full of planets.
    This year also marks the 50th anniversary of the famous "Two Cultures" lecture by C. P. Snow, the English physicist and novelist. Snow’s speech, and his later books that elaborated on it, argued that communication and respect between the sciences and humanities had broken down. Literary intellectuals, he said, were often confused at their own ignorance of basic science and yet would be shocked at a scientist unfamiliar with Shakespeare; conversely, scientists were more likely to have some schooling in the arts. This asymmetrical hostility hurt society, Snow maintained, because it hindered the embrace of what science and technology could do to eliminate poverty and inequality.
    Even today critics disagree about whether Snow’s thesis is better seen as controversial or clichéd. If the "two cultures" is a problem, however, some leaders — not just in science but also industry, government and nongovernmental organizations — are overcoming it spectacularly. They are doing what they can to ensure that the fruits of scientific knowledge are constructively applied to improve well-being and prosperity. This month, with our Scientific American 10 honor roll, we are proud to recognize a few of them.
Which of the following might be true according to C. P. Snow?
选项 A、Humanities had a larger influence than sciences at the time.
B、Sciences and humanities needed to develop separately.
C、Scientists should be literary intellectuals at the same time.
D、Poverty and inequality could only be eliminated by sci-tech.
答案A
解析 推理判断题。根据题目应该把信息定位在第六段，本段提到Snow对科学和人文的一些看法。他认为科学家接受一些文学教育的可能性更大一些，说文学和科学之间的敌对状态阻碍了人们通过科学技术来消除贫穷和不平等。也就是说，科学技术受到了限制，所以可推断出人文比科学在当时的影响更大，因此选[A]。[B]提到的科学和人文需要单独地发展，与原文的意思是相悖的；[C]也不是原文的意思；[D]提到的贫穷和不平等现象只能靠科学技术来消除是错误的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/o5p4777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)