首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
admin
2012-06-13
47
问题
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is we are terrible at predicting the source of joy. And whatever choices we do make, we likely later decide it was all for the best.
These are insights from happiness economics, perhaps the hottest field in what used to be called the dismal science. Happiness is everywhere—on the best-seller lists, in the minds of policymakers, and front and center for economists—yet it remains elusive. The golden rule of economics has always been that well-being is a simple function of income. That’s why nations and people alike strive for higher incomes—money gives us choice and a measure of freedom. After a certain income cap, we simply don’t get any happier. And it isn’t what we have, but whether we have more than our neighbor, that really matters. So the news last week that in 2006 top hedge-fund managers took home $ 240 million, minimum, probably didn’t make them any happier, it just made the rest of us less so.
Now policymakers are racing to figure out what makes people happy, and just how they should deliver it. Countries as diverse as Bhutan, Australia, China, Thailand and the UK are coming up with "happiness indexer," to be used alongside GDP as a guide to society’s progress. In Britain, the "politics of happiness" will likely figure prominently in next year’s elections. Never mind that the world’s top happiness researchers recently gathered at a conference in Rome to debate whether joy is even measurable.
Why is this all happening now? Only in the last decade have economists, psychologists, biologists and philosophers begun cross-pollinating in such a way to arrive at "happiness studies. " Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert humorously sums up much of the new wisdom in his book Stumbling on Happiness. He says 24-hour television and the Internet have allowed us all to see more seemingly happy people than ever before. "We’re sur-rounded by the lifestyles of the rich and famous," says Gilbert, "rubbing our noses in the fact that others have more. "
Of course, the idea that money isn’t the real key to happiness isn’t new. The 18th-century British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham argued that public policy should try to maximize happiness, and many prominent economists agreed but could not quite embrace the idea. There was just no way to measure happiness objectively.
One of the early revelations of happiness research, from Richard Easterlin at the University of Southern California, was that while the rich are typically happier than the poor, the happiness boost from extra cash isn’t that great once one rises above the poverty line. The reason, says Easterlin, is the "hedonic cycle": we get used to being richer darn quick, and take it for granted or compare it to what others have, not what we used to have. Turns out, keeping up with the Joneses is hard-wired into our brains, thanks to our pack-creature roots.
Though many happiness researchers say "work less, play more" is the formula for happiness, Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, suggests otherwise. Hard-working Americans ranks 17th on his list; the hard-vacationing French 39th. Human beings do want a European-style safety net, but also want freedom and opportunity.
And perhaps our intuitions about happiness should triumph over the fuzzy data, anyway. The economics of happiness has given us a couple of fairly hard and fast rules about well-being—being truly poor is bad, and time with friends and family are good. The good news is that whatever choices we make individually and as societies in the pursuit of happiness there’s good chance that they’ll seem better in hindsight. Yet another truism of happiness is that "we all wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to our past decision-making," says Gilbert. Today’s dreadful life choice will likely be tomorrow’s happy accident. Directions: The passage below summarizes the main points of the passage. Read the summary and then select the best word or phrase from the box blow according to the passage. You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on the ANSWER SHEET with a single line through the center.
We are poor at prevision of the origin of happiness, and we would probably believe the decision we made is the most satisfactory. The Happiness has become (1) every-where but tough to define. Nations and people manage to gain higher incomes based on the principle of economics that (2) are related to happiness, but that is not (3) Wealth alone isn’t necessarily what makes us happy. It makes different if we possess more than (4) , and that’s why we feel unhappy to find those top (5) have superlative income. Some nations are beginning to consider issues like measuring society’s progress by (6) as well as GDP, and researchers even held seminar to exchange surveys about the (7) , though the influential topic was advanced 10 years ago. The issue that a state policy should be (8) the happiness of the majority, erupted many decades ago by British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham and accepted by many eminent economists, could not fairly (9) , because happiness can not be objectively measured. The (10) of the happiness made by Richard Easterlin is that the wealth makes people happier, but their happiness will not (11) as great as it should be if they live above the (12) The can easily take the life for granted and (13) the more expansive way of life. They are (14) to compare the life with others and manage to keep up with the Joneses. Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, does not support the (15) "work less, play more. " According to his investigation of happiness list, people want a European-style (16) and want to enjoy freedom and opportunity as well. We should probably go beyond the confusing information and (17) the fairly principles of the happiness; poverty is (18) , staying with friends and family is (19) , and the decisions made (20) are by chance to be happy experience.
选项
答案
D
解析
根据文中的“Though many happiness researchers say‘work less,play more’is the formula for happiness”可知,许多幸福研究人员说“少工作,多娱乐”是幸福的公式。所以应填“formula for happiness”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oCnO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thisexpansionofrightshasledtobothaparalysisofthepublicserviceandtoarapidandterrible______inthecharactero
It’sbecomingsomethingofajokealongtheMaine-Canadaborder.Somanybusloadsofretiredpeoplecrisscrossthelinelooking
Intheearlyyearsofthetwentiethcentury,astrophysiciststurnedtheirattentiontoaspecialcategoryofstars,knownasCep
St.Patrick’sDayiscelebratedonMarch17,hisreligiousfeastdayandtheanniversaryofhisdeathinthefifthcentury.Lege
Computersmayonedayturnnightintoday-withgoodold,naturalsunlight.Giantcomputer-controlledmirrors,thousandsoff
InpatientswithHuntington’sdisease,it’sthepartofthebraincalledthebasalgangliathat’sdestroyed.Whilethesevict
Intimesofwar,wemusttakeprecautionsagainstactsof______aswellasofdirectviolence.
JimAyershadinvestigatedallmanneroffeloniesinhisfourteen-yearcareerwiththeOregonStatePolice.Likemostofficersw
Becauseofitsexcellenceinquality,forthelasttwoyears,Audicarhas______Germany’sToutingCarChampionship.
Opinionpollsarenowbeginningtoshowanunwillinggeneralagreementthat,whoeveristoblameandwhateverhappensfromnowo
随机试题
以下关于读者俱乐部的说法,正确的是()。
1945年10月10日,国共双方签署了()
《药品管理法实施条例》规定,在销售或进口前应当按规定进行检验或者审批的是《药品管理法》规定,药品标签必须印有规定标志的是
某药店《药品经营许可证》核定的经营范围是“中成药、中药饮片、化学药制剂、抗生素制剂”。供货商提供的《药品经营许可证》中核定的经营范围是“生化药品、中药材、中药饮片、生物制品(不含预防性生物制品)、化学原料药、中成药、化学药制剂、抗生素制剂、第二类精神药品制
设定和实施行政处罚必须以事实为依据,与违法行为的()相适应。
检索ABC公司的兽医用仪器专利。该公司的简称为ABC,全称为AbroadBaseCorporation,中文公司名称为爱博公司。该公司为BAC集团公司的子公司。兽医用仪器所属的IPC分类号是“A61D一兽医用仪器、器械、工具或方法”,其上位分类号是“A
2,3,6,15,()
一套完整的课程方案由________、课程内容、课程组织和________组成。
某媒体在综合报道了今年诺贝尔各奖项获得者的消息后,做出了如下评论:本土科学家屠呦呦获诺贝尔医学奖,这是中国人的骄傲,但是到目前为止还没有中国人获得诺贝尔经济学奖,看来中国在社会科学方面的研究与世界先进水平相比还有较大的差距。上述评论所得出的结论最可能把以下
Comparisonsweredrawnbetweenthedevelopmentoftelevisioninthe20thcenturyandthediffusionofprintinginthe15thand1
最新回复
(
0
)