首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
admin
2013-10-22
54
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
According to the author’s experience, what happens to the rooms originally for books?
选项
A、They are not larger than before.
B、They are filled with other things.
C、They are filled with CDs.
D、They are cleaner and more spare.
答案
B
解析
细节辨认题。定位句表明,虽然曾经藏书的房间不再用来藏书了,或者说,没有那么多书了,从理论上讲,房间应该更加宽敞、更加整洁了,但是作者的经验却告诉我们“其他东西占满了可用的空间”,即答案为B)“那些房间如今堆满了其他东西”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oKc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
"Family"isofcourseanelasticword.ButwhenBritishpeoplesaythattheirsocietyisbasedonfamilylife,theyarethinking
A、Mostpeoplepassedthestoneasifnothinghadhappened.B、Mostpeopledidnothingbutcomplain.C、Mostpeopletriedtomovet
RecentstudiesbytheCouncilofEuropeshowthat______.Althoughitisdifficultnowadaystoconvincethepublicoftheimpor
WhiteHouse,official【S1】______ofthepresidentoftheU.S.,builtinitsoriginalformbetween1792and1800,and【S2】______inW
A、EditingSundaySport.B、WorkingforCapitalRadio.C、Managingprofessionalsoccerteams.D、Developingasportsmarketingcompa
Acoupleofmonthsago,Iwenttoadepartmentstoretobuyafewthingsforthehouse.Ineededasetofcurtainsforthelivin
A、Physicsorchemistry.B、Englishorhistory.C、Anthropologyorpoliticalscience.D、Languageorphilosophy.A文中作者的观点是除非你的博士读的是像
A、Customerscantestthecomfortofanexpensiveitem.B、Consumersarereluctanttobuysomeproductsonline.C、Customerscanen
Thepassagegivesexamplesofsometypicalbloggerstodescribebloggingasanewwayofonlineperformance.Althoughthereare
Althoughthestigma(耻辱)onceassociatedwithmentalillnesshasgraduallygoneawayinrecentyears,mostoftheAmericanswhoha
随机试题
()是人脑对物体的长度、面积、体积在量方面变化的反映。
下列不属于声卡功能的是______。
保证设定的条件有哪些?
下列各项,不属于败毒散组成药物的是()
罪责刑相适应原则
计算机能直接识别的语言是()。
贷款回收是指借款人按借款合同约定的还款计划、还款方式及时、足额地偿还()。
2016年12月1日,国务院新闻办公室发表《发展权:中国的理念、实践与贡献》白皮书指出,发展是中国共产党执政兴国的第一要务,是解决中国所有问题的关键。新中国取得了举世瞩目的巨大成就,开创了人类文明发展史上()的新道路。
1984年在龙骨坡遗址发现的小种大熊猫化石,年代测定距今约180万年至248万年,是目前中国发现的最早的小种大熊猫化石,小种大熊猫被公认为是大熊猫的老祖宗。此次发现进一步证明,大熊猫不但起源于龙骨坡,而且还在长江流域进化繁衍。这段文字的中心意思是( )。
计算机中16位浮点数的表示格式如图1所示:某机器码为1110001010000000。若阶码为移码且尾数为反码,其十进制真值为(8);若阶码为移码且尾数为原码,其十进制真值为(9);若阶码为补码且尾数为反码,其十进制真值为
最新回复
(
0
)