首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
It is commonly assumed that even if some forgeries have aesthetic merit, no forgery has as much as an original by the imitated a
It is commonly assumed that even if some forgeries have aesthetic merit, no forgery has as much as an original by the imitated a
admin
2016-10-15
27
问题
It is commonly assumed that even if some forgeries have aesthetic merit, no forgery has as much as an original by the imitated artist would. Yet even the most prominent art specialists can be
duped
by a talented artist turned forger into mistaking an almost perfect forgery for an original. For instance, artist Han van Meegeren’ s The Disciples at Emmaus(1937)—painted under the forged signature of the acclaimed Dutch master Jan Vermeer(1632 — 1675)—attracted lavish praise from experts as one of Vermeer’s finest works. The painting hung in a Rotterdam museum until 1945, when, to the great embarrassment of the critics; van Meegeren revealed its origin. Astonishingly, there was at least one highly reputed critic who persisted in believing it to be a Vermeer even after van Meegeren’s confession.
Given the experts’ initial enthusiasm, some philosophers argue that van Meegeren’s painting must have possessed aesthetic characteristics that, in a Vermeer original, would have justified the critics’ plaudits. Van Meegeren’ s Emmaus thus raises difficult questions regarding the status of superbly executed forgeries. Is a forgery inherently inferior as art? How are we justified, if indeed we are, in revising downwards our critical assessment of a work unmasked as a forgery? Philosopher of art Alfred Lessing proposes convincing answers to these questions.
A forged work is indeed inferior as art, Lessing argues, but not because of a shortfall in aesthetic qualities strictly defined, that is to say, in the qualities perceptible on the picture’ s surface. For example, in its composition, its technique, and its brilliant use of color, van Meegeren’s work is flawless, even beautiful. Lessing argues instead that the deficiency lies in what might be called the painting’s intangible qualities. All art, explains Lessing, involves technique, but not all art involves origination of a new vision, and originality of vision is one of the fundamental qualities by which artistic, as opposed purely aesthetic, accomplishment is measured. Thus Vermeer is acclaimed for having inaugurated, in the seventeenth century, a new way of seeing, and pioneering techniques for embodying this new way of seeing through distinctive treatment of light, color, and form.
Even if we grant that van Meegeren, with his undoubted mastery of Vermeer’ s innovative techniques, produced an aesthetically superior painting, he did so about three centuries after Vermeer developed the techniques in question. Whereas Vermeer’ s origination of these techniques in the seventeenth century represents a truly impressive and historic achievement, van Meegeren’s production of The Disciples at Emmaus in the twentieth century presents nothing new or creative to the history of art. Van Meegeren’s forgery therefore, for all its aesthetic merits, lacks the historical significance that makes Vermeer’s work artistically great.
Which one of the following most accurately express the main point of the passage?
选项
A、The Disciples at Emmaus, Van Meegeren’s forgery of a Vermeer, was a failure in both aesthetic and artistic terms.
B、Forged artworks are artistically inferior to originals because artistic value depends in large part on originality of vision.
C、The most skilled forgers can deceive even highly qualified art experts into accepting their work as original.
D、All critics tend to be unreliable judges of the aesthetic and artistic quality of works of art.
答案
B
解析
本题考查考生对全文大意的理解和概括。文章由艺术家凡·米格伦伪造荷兰著名艺术大师简·维梅尔的作品长期被认为是维梅尔真品的例子入手,探讨赝品与真品在审美特性和艺术特性方面的差别,得出赝品与真品相比,不一定缺少审美上的技巧和特征,缺少的是原创性的视野和历史意义,最终又回到上述例子,指出赝品的艺术性低于原作,因此[B]是正确答案。[A]选项不仅没有概括出文章大意,而且说法本身就错误,凡·米格伦仿制维梅尔的作品长期被认为是维梅尔的真作,原因就在于它并不缺乏审美上的特性,不能说是审美性的失败,因此[A]错误。[C]选项说法没有问题,但不是全文的主旨所在,因此不选。[D]选项也是不仅没有概括出文章大意,而且说法本身就错误,“所有的”“都”这种太绝对的说法往往是错误选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oToZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Forthepastfiveyears,Dr.StephenPosthasbeenfundingresearchprojectsthattesthowaltruism(selflessness),compassion,
Theclean-energybusinessisturningintothenextbiginvestmentboom,inwhichrisksarelightlyignored.Untilrecently,reca
"What’sthedifferencebetweenGodandLarryEllison?"asksanoldsoftwareindustryjoke.Answer:Goddoesn’tthinkhe’sLarry
Telecommuting,Internetshoppingandonlinemeetingsmaysaveenergyascomparedwithin-personalternatives,butasthedigital
IntheUnitedStates,thefirstdaynursery,wasopenedin1854.Nurserieswereestablishedinvariousareasduringthe【C1】_____
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewplay?Soonafteranevent【C1】______,newspapersar
Lawyersarelessthan1%ofAmericanadults,【C1】______theyarewell-representedingovernment.Boththepresidentandthevice-p
It’seasytoscarepeopleaboutwhat’sintheirfood,butthedangerisalmostneverreal.Andthe【C1】______itselfkills.Ta
It’seasytoscarepeopleaboutwhat’sintheirfood,butthedangerisalmostneverreal.Andthe【C1】______itselfkills.Ta
Nowcustomhasnotbeencommonlyregardedasasubjectofanygreatimportance.Theinnerworkingsofourownbrainswefeelto
随机试题
散文《本志罪案之答辩书》中的“志”指的是()
在海上货物运输保险中,除合同另有约定外,哪些原因造成的货物损失,保险人不予赔偿?()
新研制的尚未制定国家标准、行业标准的消防产品,经()鉴定符合消防安全要求的,方可生产、销售、使用。
在我国,社区服务于1986年由国家()从探索建立社会保障制度的高度第一次提出。
灌县的西北是一派直达青海、新疆的大山脉。群山中汇聚而下的水向灌县的东南分流,直入岷江,春季常常成为山洪,泛滥成灾。山洪入岷江口的东北角上有石山挡住,阻塞大水向东流淌,使川中十余县缺乏灌溉。李冰是那时候这个地方的郡守,凭着超人的卓见,过人的胆量,居然想到将石
2012年全年全社会固定资产投资374676亿元,比上年增长20.3%,增速比2011年回落3.5个百分点;扣除价格因素,实际增长19.0%。其中,固定资产投资(不含农户)364835亿元,增长20.6%,比2011年回落3.4个百分点;农户投资984.1
有如下程序:#include<iostream>usingnamespacestd;classTestClass{public:~TestClass(){cout<<’’BASE’’;}}
TheAmericanFamilyIntheAmericanfamilythehusbandandwifeusuallyshareimportantdecisionmaking.Whenthechildrena
Itookwhathesaid______,butafterwardsitbecameclearthathereallymeantsomethingelse.
A、Displayawarningstickeronthecar.B、Remembertohidethesparekeyinasafeplace.C、Putyourdriver’slicenseinsidethe
最新回复
(
0
)