首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
admin
2014-06-30
42
问题
Does the Internet Make You Dumber?
[A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to be nowhere. " Today, the Internet grants us easy access to unprecedented amounts of information. But a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that the Net, with its constant distractions and interruptions, is also turning us into disrupted and superficial thinkers.
[B]The picture emerging from the research is deeply troubling, at least to anyone who values the depth, rather than just the velocity(速度), of human thought. People who read text studded with links, the studies show, comprehend less than those who read traditional linear text. People who watch busy multimedia presentations remember less than those who take in information in a more sedate(镇定的)and focused manner. People who are continually distracted by e-mails, alerts and other messages understand less than those who are able to concentrate. And people who juggle(尽力同时应付)many tasks are less creative and less productive than those who do one thing at a time.
[C]The common thread in these disabilities is dispersing our attention. The richness of our thoughts, our memories and even our personalities hinges on our ability to focus the mind and sustain concentration. Only when we pay deep attention to a new piece of information are we able to associate it "meaningfully and systematically with knowledge already well established in memory," writes the Nobel Prize winning neuroscientist(神经科学家)Eric Kandel. Such associations are essential to mastering complex concepts.
[D]When we’re constantly distracted and interrupted, as we tend to be online, our brains are unable to generalize the strong and expansive neural connections that give depth and distinctiveness to our contemplating. We become mere signal-processing units, quickly shepherding disjointed bits of information into and then out of short-term memory.
[E]In an article published in Science last year, Patricia Greenfield, a leading developmental psychologist, reviewed dozens of studies on how different media technologies influence our cognitive abilities. Some of the studies indicated that certain computer tasks, like playing video games, can enhance "visual literacy skills" , increasing the speed at which people can shift their focus among icons and other images on screens. Other studies, however, found that such rapid shifts in focus, even if performed adeptly, result in less rigorous and "more automatic" thinking.
[F]In one experiment conducted at Cornell University, for example, half a class of students was allowed to use Internet-connected laptops during a lecture, while the other had to keep their computers shut. Those who browsed the Web performed much worse on a subsequent test of how well they retained the lecture’s content. While it’s hardly surprising that Web surfing would distract students, it should be a note of caution to schools that are wiring their classrooms in hopes of improving learning.
[G]Ms. Greenfield concluded that " every medium develops some cognitive skills at the expense of others. " Our growing use of screen-based media, she said, has strengthened visual-spatial intelligence, which can improve the ability to do jobs that involve keeping track of lots of simultaneous signals, like air traffic control. But that has been accompanied by " new weaknesses in higher-order cognitive processes," including " abstract vocabulary, mindfulness, reflection, inductive problem solving, critical thinking, and imagination. " We’re becoming, in a word, shallower.
[H]In another experiment, recently conducted at Stanford University’s Communication between Humans and Interactive Media Lab, a team of researchers gave various cognitive tests to 49 people who do a lot of media multitasking and 52 people who multitask much less frequently. The heavy multitaskers performed poorly on all the tests. They were more easily distracted, had less control over their attention, and were much less able to distinguish important information from trivial.
[I]The researchers were surprised by the results. They had expected that the intensive multitaskers would have gained some unique mental advantages from all their on-screen juggling. But that wasn’t the case. In fact, the heavy multitaskers weren’t even good at multitasking. They were considerably less adept at switching between tasks than the more infrequent multitaskers. " Everything distracts them," observed Clifford Nass, the professor who heads the Stanford lab.
[J]It would be one thing if the ill effects went away as soon as we turned off our computers and cellphones. But they don’t. The cellular structure of the human brain, scientists have discovered, adapts readily to the tools we use, including those for finding, storing and sharing information. By changing our habits of mind, each new technology strengthens certain neural pathways and weakens others. The cellular alterations continue to shape the way we think even when we’re not using the technology.
[K]The pioneering neuroscientist Michael Merzenich believes our brains are being "massively remodeled" by our ever-intensifying use of the Web and related media. In the 1970s and 1980s, Mr. Merzenich, now a professor emeritus at the University of California in San Francisco, conducted a famous series of experiments on primate brains that revealed how extensively and quickly neural circuits change in response to experience. When, for example, Mr. Merzenich rearranged the nerves in a monkey’s hand, the nerve cells in the animal’s sensory cortex quickly reorganized themselves to create a new "mental map" of the hand. In a conversation late last year, he said that he was profoundly worried about the cognitive consequences of the constant distractions and interruptions the Internet bombards us with. The long-term effect on the quality of our intellectual lives, he said, could be " deadly".
[L]What we seem to be sacrificing in all our surfing and searching is our capacity to engage in the quieter, attentive modes of thought that underpin contemplation, reflection and introspection. The Web never encourages us to slow down. It keeps us in a state of perpetual mental locomotion. It is revealing, and distressing, to compare the cognitive effects of the Internet with those of an earlier information technology, the printed book. Whereas the Internet scatters our attention, the book focuses it. Unlike the screen, the page promotes contemplativeness.
[M]Reading a long sequence of pages helps us develop a rare kind of mental discipline. The innate bias of the human brain, after all, is to be distracted. Our predisposition is to be aware of as much of what’s going on around us as possible. Our fast-paced, reflexive shifts in focus were once crucial to our survival. They reduced the odds that a predator would take us by surprise or that we’d overlook a nearby source of food.
[N]To read a book is to practice an unnatural process of thought. It requires us to place ourselves at what T. S. Eliot, in his poem "Four Quartets" , called "the still point of the turning world". We have to forge or strengthen the neural links needed to counter our instinctive distractedness, thereby gaining greater control over our attention and our mind.
[O]It is this control, this mental discipline, which we are at risk of losing as we spend ever more time scanning and skimming online. If the slow progression of words across printed pages damped our craving to be inundated by mental stimulation, the Internet indulges it. It returns us to our native state of distractedness, while presenting us with far more distractions than our ancestors ever had to contend with. —Nicholas Carr is the author, most recently, of "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains".
The experiment conducted at Cornell University indicates web surfing to school would distract students’ thoughts.
选项
答案
F
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oZ17777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Somestudentsarenotadequatelypreparedforcollege.Shouldweturnthemaway?【B1】______them?Ormodifyourproduct?American
Thejobofraisingchildrenisatoughone.Childrendon’tcomewithaninstruction【C1】______.Andeachchildisdifferent.Sop
A、Itwasmisleading.B、Itwasratherboring.C、Itwasenjoyable.D、Itwasjustso-so.C女士说她以前从未听过如此有趣的演讲,男士说Yes,wasn’titmarvel
CanTonyBlairSavetheWorldofBooks?AtthebeginningofAJourney,TonyBlairboaststhathehas"thesoulofarebel".
秦始皇是中国统一后的第一位皇帝,他统治中国的时间是公元前246至公元前210年。在他35年的统治下,他成功创建了壮观又巨大的建筑工程。他促进了文化和思想上的发展,同时也对中国造成了很大的破坏。应该记住他创造的功绩还是他的暴政是一个很有争议性的问题,但是每个
中国新年是中国最重要的传统节日,在中国也被称为春节。新年的庆祝活动从除夕开始一直延续到元宵节(theLanternFestival),即从农历(lunarcalendar)最后一个月的最后一天至新年第一个月的第十五天。各地欢度春节的习俗和传统有很大差
Theconceptofobtainingfreshwaterfromicebergsthataretowedtopopulatedareasandaridregionsoftheworldwasoncetrea
A、TheycamefromEurope350yearsago.B、TheywerethefirstresidentsinNorthAmerica.C、TheysettledalongtheAtlanticcoast
A、Trytochangehisreservations.B、Travelbytraininsteadofbyplane.C、Continuetryingtogetaticket.D、CancelhisDecembe
随机试题
某中学在学期末开展对学生的综合素质评价工作,不仅提前公布了评价的内容、标准、方法、程序以及相关评价人员和制度,设置了教师、学生、家长等多种人员参与的评价体系,还建立了相应的学生申诉制度。其最终目的是确保评价工作的()原则。
皮肤的最外层是:
A.异烟肼B.链霉素C.吡嗪酰胺D.乙胺丁醇E.乙硫异烟胺可引起精神兴奋、周围神经炎、肝功受损的是
A、发热恶寒,无汗,脉浮紧B、发热恶风,汗出,脉浮缓C、小腹胀满,小便不利D、小腹胀满,小便自利E、腹痛拒按,大便秘结太阳伤寒证可见
下列哪项对阿司匹林叙述是错误的
心理咨询师对求助者的行为表现“理解”的含义是()。
上海合作组织(简称“上合组织”),于2001年6月15日正式成立,其前身为“上海五国”会晤机制。下列关于上海合作组织的说法正确的是()。
Dopeoplegethappierormorefoul-temperedastheyage?Stereotypesofirritableneighbors【C1】______,scientistshavebeentryi
A、Thefirstrow.B、Thesecondrow.C、Thethirdrow.D、Thefourthrow.D对话中,女士询问她是否可以坐在这里,男士表示抱歉,并说明前三排都是给公司的客人预留的。由此可见,女士只能坐在第三排
A、Becauseitisalongway.B、Becauseitiswarmer.C、Becauseitiscolder.D、Becausegoingtherecoststoomuch.CWhydon’tthe
最新回复
(
0
)