首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their back
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their back
admin
2014-09-18
72
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes. ) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know &40out any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question.
The recent legal action taken, by some black parents in California aimed to ______.
选项
A、draw public attention to IQ testing
B、put an end to special education
C、remove the state’s ban on intelligence tests
D、have their children enter white schools
答案
C
解析
细节理解题。诉讼中提到“政府禁止IQ测试是对他们(黑人儿童)的歧视,这样一来他们的子女就不可能进入特殊班级受教育”。指责其不公,自然是要把它取消,所以C项为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oZTK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Foralongtime,newspapershavebeenthechiefmeansbywhichpeoplegetthemselves(1)______.Thenewspapers,daily,evening,a
Foralongtime,newspapershavebeenthechiefmeansbywhichpeoplegetthemselves(1)______.Thenewspapers,daily,evening,a
ItiscommonlybelievedintheUnitedStatesthatschooliswherepeoplegotogetaneducation.(1)______,ithasbeensaidthat
Youknowyouhavetoread"betweenthelines"togetthemostoutofanything.Iwanttopersuadeyoutodosomethingequallyim
Shortlybeforehediedoflymphoma(淋巴瘤),thegreatwriterandphysicianLewisThomas,whosebooksturnedscienceintoawayofa
For12dayseveryspring,theinhabitantsofErlangen,auniversitytownnearNuremberg,forgettheirdailyroutinesanddevote
Thematchwascancelledbecausemostofthemembers______amatchwithoutastandardcourt.
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Thedataofourliveswastoberecordedindigitalclouds
Shesaidshewouldn’tcallusthenextday,______she?
Livinginthedesertinvolvesalotofproblems,______watershortageistheworst.
随机试题
Thehousesinthisvillagearesimilar______thoseinthatvillage.
牙冠修复体的邻面与邻牙紧密接触的目的不是为了
关于无独立请求权第三人,下列哪些说法是错误的?(2011—卷三—80,多)
当基层厚度的代表值偏差满足要求但存在超过极值偏差的测点时,厚度这项指标评为0分。()
方程=0的通解为:
根据《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》GB50500—2013,招标方为了获得合理的计日工报价,适宜采取的做法是()。
班杜拉认为,行为的结果因素就是通常所说的强化,并把强化分为()。
阅读材料,回答问题。 (1)指出隋朝大运河的各段名称。 (2)概述大运河开凿历史意义。
谷子大约在5000万年前开始从水稻中分化出来,分化之后的基因组结构仍存在明显的共线性。研究人员发现谷子的2号和9号染色体分别由水稻的7号和9号、3号和10号染色体融合而成。同时,他们发现这两次融合事件也发生在高粱的染色体中,由此,研究人员推测这两次染色体融
A、B、C、D、A
最新回复
(
0
)