首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
59
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What does RPO start with?
选项
A、Third party recruiters
B、Contract recruiting
C、Internal staffing Agency
D、In-house recruitment
答案
A
解析
文中第三段提到“Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives.”即:招聘流程外包是一个演化过程的高峰,这个过程从第三方招聘发展起来,最初是为部门经理服务或是一个公司内部招聘主动权的附属机构。所以,A项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oo7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whathasthecompanyrecentlydone?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatdidthemayorrecentlydo?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
随机试题
不属于慢性子宫颈炎病理表现的为
有效成分能溶于水,且对湿、热均较稳定的药材常采用的浸出方法是
A、甲型肝炎病毒B、乙型肝炎病毒C、丙型肝炎病毒D、丁型肝炎病毒E、戊型肝炎病毒属DNA病毒的是
属于《GB/T19000:2008质量管理体系》国家标准规定的质量管理基本原则的是()。
下列分片到货塔器现场组焊的要求中,属于卧式组对要求的是()。
使用FCA术语应注意的事项是()。
关于期货期权的内涵价值,以下说法正确的是()。
可修复废品返修以前发生的生产费用转出计入废品损失,加上返修发生的各种费用,扣除回收的残料价值和应收的赔款,转入生产成本的借方。()
根据反垄断法律的规定,对于特定种类的可豁免垄断协议,经营者应当证明所达成协议不会严重限制相关市场的竞争,并且能够使消费者分享由此产生的利益,下列各项中,属于上述特定种类的可豁免垄断协议的有()。(2009年试题.新)
农业社会主义改造是在人民民主专政条件下,通过合作化道路,把小农经济逐步改造成为社会主义集体经济,是中国共产党在过渡时期总路线的一个重要组成部分。我国对农业进行社会主义改造的主要方式是
最新回复
(
0
)