首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
70
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What does RPO start with?
选项
A、Third party recruiters
B、Contract recruiting
C、Internal staffing Agency
D、In-house recruitment
答案
A
解析
文中第三段提到“Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives.”即:招聘流程外包是一个演化过程的高峰,这个过程从第三方招聘发展起来,最初是为部门经理服务或是一个公司内部招聘主动权的附属机构。所以,A项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oo7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whathasthecompanyrecentlydone?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
随机试题
男性患者,53岁,胸痛2小时,诊断为高侧壁心梗,心电图特征性改变见于下列哪一组导联( )。
急性硬脑膜外血肿病人意识障碍的典型表现是
充沙袋冲灌前,()应连接牢固。冲灌时,高压水枪不得射向人员或电气设备。
甲企业因拓展业务需要,向政府租赁一块开发成熟的国有建设用地建厂房,租期20年。支付土地租金后,由于经营困难,并没完成合同约定的开发建设,仅在其上建造了一栋办公楼。2年后,甲企业将办公楼抵押给银行,并将土地转租给乙企业。请就上述内容。回答问题。如果承租
某建筑物的建筑面积5000m2,坐落的土地面积为2000m2,土地价格1500元/m2,用成本法估算出的该建筑物的重置价格为1600元/m2,市场上该房地产的正常房地价格为1800元/m2,则该建筑物的价格为1700元/m2。()
根据水闸承担的任务,下列水闸一般需具备双向过水能力的有()。
对存货的监盘结果只能证明存货是否存在,是否毁损、短缺,却不能证明存货的计价是否正确和所有权归属问题,对这一点的审计证据鉴定的根据是()。
自我效能感理论的创立者是_________。
【君主立宪派】
AgingposesaseriouschallengetoOECD(OrganizationofEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment)countries,inparticular,howto
最新回复
(
0
)