首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
47
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
______,we’dbettermakesomechangesintheplan.
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Bysaying"Hisideawasasuccess"
Aspointedoutatthebeginningofthepassage,peopleusedtothinkthatairpollution______.Astothegreenhouseeffect,th
Theyrequiredthatallthenecessarydocuments______tothepresident’sofficebeforetheendofthismonth.
Whywasreadingaloudcommonbeforethenineteenthcentury?Thedevelopmentofsilentreadingduringthenineteenthcenturyind
Beforetheconferencebegan,aJapanesebusinessmanwasintroducedtoanAmericanbusinessmanatthelounge.TheJapanesebusine
Icaughtthelastbusfromtown,butHarrycamehome______thatnight.
Amanisbeingquestionedinrelationtothe______murderlastnight.
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
随机试题
下列属于战术营销的有()
急性化脓性牙髓炎有特点的症状是
A、抗精神病作用B、镇吐作用C、体温调节失灵D、帕金森综合征E、巨人症阻断结节-漏斗系统的D2受体可试用于
下列关于债券发行主体的说法中,错误的是()。
阅读下列有关材料,按要求完成任务。材料一《普通高中化学课程标准(实验)》的内容标准举例说明化学能与电能的转化关未及其应用。认识提高燃料的燃烧效率、开发高能清洁燃料和研制新型电池的重要性。材料二某版本教科书《化学2》(必修)的知识结构体系第一章物质结
已知产品某项指标X服从拉普拉斯分布,其密度为f(x)=e-|x-μ|,一∞<x<+∞,其中μ为未知参数.现从该产品中随机抽取3个,测得其该项指标值为1028,968,1007.(1)试用矩估计法求μ的估计;(2)试用最大似然估计法求μ的估计.
执行以下程序段后,(AX)=( )。 MOV AX,0 MOV BX,1 MOV CX,100 A:ADD AX,BX INC BX LOOP A HLT
使用PowerDesigner的DataArchitect可以对数据库生成物理数据模型(PDM),这种功能通常称为【】。
Theboy______blackisLiLei.
A、ItsfieldsofstudiesarethebestamongalltheuniversitiesinCanada.B、Ithaseducatedmanyfamouspeopleinvariousfield
最新回复
(
0
)