首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
50
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
______thetimelyrescue,alotmorepeoplewouldhavebeenkilledintheearthquake.
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Bysaying"Hisideawasasuccess"
Agoodtitleforthispassageis______.Thispassagesuggeststhatnotgettingenoughsleepmightmakeyou______.
Thatcountryhasfallenbehindothercountries(inmanufactureofcheapcottongoods).
Mostchildrenwithhealthyappetitesarereadytoeatalmostanythingthatisofferedthemandachildrarelydislikesfood【B1】
Someresearchesevensuggestthat(childrenapplythebehaviorsobservedonTVprogramstotheirreal-lifesituations).
Whywasreadingaloudcommonbeforethenineteenthcentury?Theemergenceofthemassmediaandofspecializedperiodicalsshow
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
随机试题
A.触摸大动脉搏动B.观察瞳孔是否散大固定C.同步直流电除颤D.非同步直流电除颤E.人工呼吸,胸按压心搏骤停后首先采取的措施是
关于2型糖尿病的健康指导,不正确的是
某患者,女,50岁,症见面色暗滞,心悸气短,自汗乏力,咳喘,胸闷发憋,舌有瘀斑,脉细弱,辨证为
A.支气管哮喘B.喘息型慢性支气管炎C.支气管肺癌D.肺炎支原体肺炎E.克雷白杆菌肺炎刺激性咳嗽,伴气急、痰中带血,支气管解痉药效果欠佳,常见于
A.砂仁B.草果C.豆蔻D.苍术既能燥湿健脾,又能祛风散寒的药物是
下列哪种做法不利于阴道毛滴虫生长
根据现行《宪法》规定,关于公民的权利和自由,下列选项表述正确的是()。
甲、乙、丙成立一普通合伙企业,但并未约定合伙期限。不久甲退伙,后丁入伙。对此,下列表述正确的是()。
“两个世纪过去了,人类社会发生了巨大而深刻的变化,但马克思的名字依然在世界各地受到人们的尊敬,马克思的学说依然闪烁着耀眼的真理光芒!”马克思主义是基本立场、基本观点和基本方法的有机统一。从基本立场来看,马克思主义
已知一棵二叉树的先根序列为ABCDEFK,中根序列为DGBAFCK,则结点的后根序列为()。
最新回复
(
0
)