首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
68
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Childrennormallyfeelalotof______abouttheirfirstdayatschool.
Theygaveuptheireffortstolookforsurvivors(幸存者)(afterdeterminingthatallpeopleinthesunkenshiphaddied).
Theconceptofpersonalchoiceconcerninghealthisimportantbecause______.To"liveacompletelysedentarylifestyle"(Line
Normallyastudentwouldatleastattend______classeseachweek.Americanuniversitystudentsareusuallyunderpressureofw
BeijingistospenduptoUS$20billiontochangetheChinesecapitalintoa21st-centuryoneforthe2008Olympics.Theg
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
Todayapilotistotallydependentonwhattheairtrafficcontrolleronthegroundtellshim.Hecan’tseeenoughtobesafe.F
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
随机试题
A、急性血源性骨髓炎B、膝关节滑膜炎C、化脓性关节炎D、膝关节单纯滑膜结核E、膝关节全关节结核关节腔穿刺注药无效时,手术切除关节滑膜的是()
实喘风寒壅肺证选用
原发性大隐静脉曲张的发病因素是
菟丝子主要含()
工程量清单的项目设置主要有()。
建设项目或单项工程造价指数的计算式中包含有()。【2009年真题】
证券公司、设立集合资产管理计划,办理集合资产管理业务,除具有业务资格外,还应当符合()要求。
根据《合同法》和《担保法》的有关规定,下列表述正确的是()。
下面哪—对学生的课被同时安排在周二上(并不一定按题目中所给出的顺序)?若H的课在U之后,则下面哪一项关于H和U的课的陈述可能是正确的?
ThomasWheeler,【D1】______oftheMassachusettsMutualLife【D2】______Company,andhiswifeweredrivingalonganinterstatehighwa
最新回复
(
0
)