首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
40
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Therewasalargewarehouse(在河对岸).
I’mnotsurprisedyoufailedtheexam.You______haveworkedharder.
Ifyoureallywanttoapplyforthedangerousjob,Iwon’t______,thoughIthinkit’sacrazyidea.
Hewillbesentto(一样收取高学费的学校)hisfatherattended.
Shecan’tpreventherlittleboy______shooting______birds.
Theyrequiredthatallthenecessarydocuments______tothepresident’sofficebeforetheendofthismonth.
AtypicalAmericanwomanis______.Duringtheindustrializedtwentiethcentury,theroleofwomen______.
Thereareseveralmeansofmasscommunication.Thenewspaperisone.Televisionis______.
Thefootballmatchwastelevised_____fromtheBeijingOlympicStadium.
(79)TheOlympicGamesareheldeveryfouryearsinadifferentcityintheworld.Athletesfrommanycountriescompeteinavari
随机试题
A、Itkilledalltheharmfulinsects.B、Itbroughtastoptothedamageofcropsbyinsects.C、Itkilledonlythebeneficialinse
关于原发性视网膜脱离描述正确的是
下列关于粉碎的叙述哪一项是错误的
基差交易是指按一定的基差来确定(),以进行现货商品买卖的交易形式。
押品价值评估的主要方法有()。
形成通货膨胀的直接原因是()。
2011年,河北省农产品进出口总额41.1亿美元,同比增长21.2%,其中进口同比增长20.6%。2011年12月,河北省农产品出口、进口额均创历史新高,当月进出口4.5亿美元,同比增长30.7%,环比增长35.0%。其中出口1.6亿美元,同比增长8.
在青少年期,关于自我同一性的四种可能性中,不健康的是()
Thesadtruthisthatecosystemsare______fragileandintenselycomplicated.
—______madehisdaughtersoabsent-mindedthismorning?—Idon’tknow.Maybeitwasthegift.
最新回复
(
0
)