首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
31
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Inthesupermarket(人人自助购物).
I’mnotsurprisedyoufailedtheexam.You______haveworkedharder.
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:ALetterofApplication.Youshouldwriteatleas
Ifyoureallywanttoapplyforthedangerousjob,Iwon’t______,thoughIthinkit’sacrazyidea.
Aspointedoutatthebeginningofthepassage,peopleusedtothinkthatairpollution______.Theunderlinedword"offset"in
Withthehelpoftheforeignexperts,thefactoryproduced______carsin2001astheyearbefore.
Ihope______myletter.
"Doyoulikebeingmarried?""Yes,butI’mnotused______everynight."
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
随机试题
下列哪些是骨折晚期并发症()。
下列属于合成高分子材料的囊材是
大肠埃希菌接种到乳糖胆盐发酵培养液中,置(364-1)℃培养24h后,可见培养液
最佳质量的防己是
下列对生命神圣论说法不正确的是
人与机器人协作成果能获得直接体现的重要原因是()。
设有如下语句:typedefstructDate{intyear;intmonth;intday;}DATE;则以下叙述中错误的是()。
Insomeways,Chinaisanunlikelyhotbedfore-commerce.Only38percentofonlinebuyerspaywithcreditordebitcards,using
Nexttimeyougazeoutside【C1】______acoldwinterdayandthinkhowdeadeverythingappears,takeacloserlook.Naturem
具有讽刺意义的是,诸如化妆品和减肥饮料这些被广告大肆渲染的产品对人体的魅力甚至是有害的。(detrimentalto)
最新回复
(
0
)