首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
32
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Childrennormallyfeelalotof______abouttheirfirstdayatschool.
Hewillbesentto(一样收取高学费的学校)hisfatherattended.
WhatwasthehightemperatureinColumbus,OhioonDecember12?Howmanycitieshadatemperaturebelow0°sometimesduringthe
Thatcountryhasfallenbehindothercountries(inmanufactureofcheapcottongoods).
Agriculturalproductioninthatcountryhasincreased______inrecentyears.
Everycitizeninademocraticcountrymay______theprotectionofthelaw.
Thereareseveralmeansofmasscommunication.Thenewspaperisone.Televisionis______.
______twoexamstoworryabout,Ihavetoworkreallyhardthisweekend.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
随机试题
改善医护人际关系的途径不包含()。
原子能级的相关叙述,错误的是
2006年住在甲省A市的个体工商户李某和王某从外省运进一批啤酒,途经甲省B市时被与B市相邻的甲省C市公安局扣押。同日下午4点,李某和王某被带到C市公安局直到第二天早晨9点才被释放,C市公安局并没有出具任何手续。3天后,C市公安局以李某和王某违反该省关于本省
2014年1月1日,甲企业取得专门借款2000万元直接用于当日开工建造的厂房,2014年累计发生建造支出1800万元。2015年1月1日,该企业又取得一般借款500万元,年利率为6%,当天发生建造支出300万元,以借入款项支付(甲企业无其他一般借款),至年
“搭便车”现象是对下列各项中()的一种形象的比喻。
国际收入顺差对于国内经济的影响肯定是正面的。()
张某和王某是邻居,在一起行政案件的执行中,人民法院执行人员误将案外人员王某的一间房屋当作被执行人张某的房屋强行拆毁。王某提出赔偿请求,该损失应由谁赔偿?()
5,7,9,(),15,19
在PowerPoint2010中,需要在幻灯片母版中添加了公司的LOGO图片。现在希望在放映时暂不显示该图片,最佳的操作方法是()。
In1932,inthedepthofthedepression,theAmericanpeoplechose______astheirnextpresidentwhopromiseda"NewDeal"tog
最新回复
(
0
)