首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
42
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Bobneedsatutorbecauseitisimportant______onhisexamnextmonth.
Recentpsychologicalstudieshaveshownthatmanychildrendevelop______fearsofdangers.
Ithasoftenbeensaidbypeopleinvolvedinlanguageteachingthatastudentwhoreallywantstolearnwillsucceedwhateverth
Theyrequiredthatallthenecessarydocuments______tothepresident’sofficebeforetheendofthismonth.
Howmanycountrieswill______inthe2008OlympicGames?
Theonlythingthatreallymatterstothechildrenishowsoonthey____returntotheirschool.
Tommakeuphismindtogetaseatforthefootballmatch_____itmeansstandinginaqueueallnight.
EveryoneusestheexpressionsAMandPM.Butdoyouexactlyknowwhattheymeanandhowtheycameintobeing?Asyouknow,t
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
随机试题
(2007年4月)(2006年5—4月)非法经营同类营业罪的犯罪主体是_______。
民族自治地方的区域界线变动的批准权属于()
某项资产在评估时,名义已使用年限为10年,根据该资产的技术指标每天应工作8小时,实际每天只工作7.2小时,由此可以估计该资产实际已使用年限为()
内因和外因对个体身心发展综合作用的汇合点是()。
下列费用中,不属于建设工程项目总投资中的设备工器具购置费的是( )。
资金来源也可统称为()。
下列合同的分类错误的是()
设,则a2=_____________.
阅读下列HTML文本和说明,在该HTML文本中存在5处错误,请指出错误所在的行号、错误原因以及改正的方法。[说明]这是一个简单的HTML文本,显示作者个人主页的登录界面。[HTML文本](1)<HTML>(2)<B
Wefindthatbrightchildrenarerarelyheldbackbymixed-abilityteaching.Onthecontrary,boththeirknowledgeandexperienc
最新回复
(
0
)