首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
58
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youaresupposedtowriteashortessayinabout100-120wordsbasedonthefollowingsituation.Remembertowrit
Therewasalargewarehouse(在河对岸).
【B1】【B10】
Ifyoureallywanttoapplyforthedangerousjob,Iwon’t______,thoughIthinkit’sacrazyidea.
Theconceptofpersonalchoiceconcerninghealthisimportantbecause______.Soundpersonalhealthchoiceisoftendifficultt
Shetalkedaboutbuyingahouseinthecountry,butnothingever______.
AtthefirstsighttheplanetMarsdoesnotappearverywelcometoanykindoflife.Ithasverylittleoxygenandwater;thete
Withthehelpoftheforeignexperts,thefactoryproduced______carsin2001astheyearbefore.
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantque
Todayapilotistotallydependentonwhattheairtrafficcontrolleronthegroundtellshim.Hecan’tseeenoughtobesafe.F
随机试题
以下是强生公司的企业信条:强生信条真挚教诲每一位员工,首先关注我们的客户,关注世界上所有的医生、护士及父母们;其次,关注自己的员工,并尊重他们的尊严和价值;另外,也关注我们的社会,时刻提醒自己为社会作出贡献,维护我们所共有的财产;最后,关注股东的利益,给股
心胸肋面
男性,31岁,因发作性高血压伴头痛、心悸入院,血压最高时210/140mmHg,诊断为嗜铬细胞瘤,宜选择下列哪种药物做术前准备
A.一级结构B.结构域C.四级结构D.二级结构E.三级结构整条肽链所有原子在三维空间的排布位置是
患者进食困难,查体:右侧咀嚼肌力弱,张口时,下颌偏向右侧,病损部位在
脾胃虚寒、大便稀溏者慎用的中成药是
承租人权益的价值等于剩余租赁期限内租约租金与同期市场租金的差异。()
项目部可否自行采购水泵?若自行采购应履行何种程序?项目部在设备采购管理中可能存在哪些失控而使所购水泵不能满足要求?
下列基坑围护结构中,主要结构材料可以回收反复使用的是()。
下列款项可以通过“应收账款”进行核算的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)