首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Raising the Minimum Wage Reduces Poverty A) One funny part of watching journalists cover the minimum wage debate is that the
Raising the Minimum Wage Reduces Poverty A) One funny part of watching journalists cover the minimum wage debate is that the
admin
2022-07-28
57
问题
Raising the Minimum Wage Reduces Poverty
A) One funny part of watching journalists cover the minimum wage debate is that they often have to try and referee cutting-edge econometric (计量经济学) debates. Some studies, notably those lead by UMass Amherst economist Arin Dube, argue that there are no adverse employment effects from small increases in the minimum wage. Other studies, notably those lead by University of California Irvine economist David Neumark, argue there is an adverse effect. Whatever can we conclude?
B) But instead of diving into that controversy, let’s take a look at where these economists, and all the other researchers investigating the minimum wage, do agree: They all tend to think that raising the minimum wage would reduce poverty. That’s the conclusion of a major new paper by Dube, titled "Minimum Wages and the Distribution of Family Incomes."
C) Let’s first highlight the major results. Dube uses the latest in minimum-wage statistics and finds a negative relationship between the minimum wage and poverty. Specifically, raising the minimum wage 10 percent (say from $7.25 to near $8) would reduce the number of people living in poverty 2.4 percent. (For those who thrive on jargon, the minimum wage has an "elasticity" of -0.24 when it comes to poverty reduction.)
D) Using this as an estimate, raising the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour, as many Democrats are proposing in 2014, would reduce the number of people living in poverty by 4.6 million. It would also boost the incomes of those at the 10th percentile (百分位) by $1,700. That’s a significant increase in the quality of life for our worst off that doesn’t require the government to tax and spend a single additional dollar.
E) And, given that this policy is self-enforcing with virtually no administrative costs while challenging the employer’s market power, it is a powerful complement to the rest of the policies the government uses to boost the living standards of the worst off, including the Earned Income Tax Credit, food stamps, Medicaid, etc.
F) Now, this is normally the part where we’d have to go through the counterarguments, using different data and techniques from different economists, to argue that the minimum wage wouldn’t do this. But this is the fun part: Dube’s paper finds a remarkable consistency across studies here. For instance, in a 2011 paper by minimum-wage opponent David Neumark, raising the minimum wage 10 percent would reduce poverty 2.9 percent (an elasticity of-0.29) for 21-44-year-old family heads or individuals. That’s very similar to what Dube finds. Neumark doesn’t mention this directly in the paper however; Dube is able to back out this conclusion using other variables that are listed.
G) Indeed, Dube digs out the effects of the minimum wage on poverty from 12 different studies in the new wave of literature on the topic that started in the 1990s with David Card and Alan Krueger field-creating research. Of the 54 elasticities that Dube is able to observe in these 12 papers, 48 of them are negative. Only one study has a sizable positive one, a 2005 one by David Neumark, a study that stands out for odd methodology (方法论) (it lacks state and yearly fixed effects, it assumes quantiles (分位数) are moving in certain directions) that isn’t standard in the field or in his subsequent work. (Indeed, it is nothing like Neumark’s standard 2011 study, mentioned above, which finds that the minimum wage reduces poverty.) Including that study, there’s an average elasticity of-0.15 across all the studies; tossing it, there’s one of-0.20 across the 11 studies, similar to what Dube finds.
H) However, these previous studies also have issues which Dube’s new study examines. This paper uses data up through 2012, so there are much more substantial variations to examine between states’ minimum wages compared to earlier studies from the 1990s. Meanwhile there are additional controls added, including those that deal with the business cycle as well as regional effects. The range of controls provide 8 different results, all of which are highlighted.
I) Now, as a general rule with these numbers, you should never observe too far away from the mean—that is, you shouldn’t take the effects of small changes to see what would happen if we, say, increased the minimum wage 500 percent, or to levels that don’t actually exist right now. But the results are promising.
J) Indeed, they are promising on three different measures of poverty. There’s the normal definition of poverty established in the 1960s as a result of how much food costs takes up in your family budget.
K) However, the relationship is both relevant and even stronger for the poverty gap, which is how far people are away from the poverty line, and the squared poverty gap, which is a focus on those with very low incomes. The elasticities here are -0.32 and -0.96 respectively, with the second having an almost one-to-one relationship because the minimum wage reduces the proportions of those with less than one-half the poverty line.
L) What should people take away from this? The first is that there are significant benefits, whatever the costs. If you look at the economist James Tobin in 1996, for instance, he argues that the "minimum wage always had to be recognized as having good income consequences…I thought in this instance those advantages outweighed the small loss of jobs." Since then there’s been substantially more work done arguing that the loss of jobs is smaller or nonexistent, and now we know that the advantages are even better, especially when it comes to boosting incomes of the poorest and reducing extreme poverty.
M) The second is that this isn’t a thing that people proposing an inequality agenda just happened to throw on the table. A higher minimum wage is a substantial response to the challenges of inequality. Opponents of a higher minimum wage focus on the idea that it largely won’t benefit the worst off.
N) A higher minimum wage will lead to a significant boost in incomes for the worst off in the bottom 30th percent of income, while having no impact on the median household.
O) As many economists have argued, the minimum wage "substantially ’held up’ the lower tail of the U.S. earnings distribution" through the late 1970s, but this effect stopped as the real value of the minimum wage fell in subsequent decades. This gives us an empirical (以经验为根据的) handle on how the minimum wage would help deal with both insufficient low-end wages and inequality, and the results are striking.
P) Charles Darwin once wrote, "If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin." One of the key institutions of the modern economy, the minimum wage, could dramatically reduce the misery of the poor. What would it say if we didn’t take advantage of it?
Raising the minimum wage is a powerful complement to other policies the government uses to improve the poorest’s standards of living.
选项
答案
E
解析
题干意为,提高最低工资对政府实施的其他提高最贫困者生活水平的政策是有力的补充。根据题干中的关键词a powerful complement和policies the government uses可定位到E段。该段提到,对于政府用于提高最贫困者生活质量的其他政策,如劳动所得税扣抵制、食品救济券和医疗补助计划等,它是有力的补充。文中的“它”指代“提高最低工资”。由此可知,题干是对原文的同义转述,故选E。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pix7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
人们从工作、读书的地方回到家里,在除夕夜与家人一起吃团圆饭。
龙,一种仅出现在神话故事中的动物,在英文中是邪恶的象征。在英语文化中,龙是中撒旦(Satan)的化身。然而在中国传统文化中,龙是为人类造福的动物。龙在中文里是吉祥、权威和珍稀的象征。现在龙在中国人的心目中依然享有崇高的地位,中国人自称“龙的传人”。龙成为民
A、Shelikestravellingandmeetingvariouskindsofpeople.B、Sheenjoystheprocessofhelpingothers.C、Shehasgottenaquali
A、Organisingprotests.B、Recruitingmembers.C、Actingasitsspokesman.D、Savingendangeredanimals.A根据选项,可以预测本题询问某人的工作内容。男士说他在
A、Itisaseriousthreattoitscompetitors.B、Itisnotpowerfulenoughtoaffecttheworldmarket.C、Thecars’qualityisgood
A、Thelocalcommunitycollege.B、Anout-of-statepubliccollege.C、Alocalprivatecollege.D、Apubliccollege.A
A、Shewantstoquitherjobinthechemistrylab.B、Shewantstogetpracticalexperience.C、She’sinterestedinbecomingapsyc
A、Shewillhaveadiscussionwiththosewhowanttobevolunteers.B、Shewillworkwithtrainingagenciestoimproveteachingsk
A、TakemedicinethatcantreatZika.B、Avoidtravelingforseveralmonths.C、Watchoutforthespreadingsituation.D、Trynotto
A、Improvedairconditionandbetterhealth.B、Reducedtrafficcostsandthegreaterfitness.C、Lessinfrastructuredemandsandc
随机试题
Aresomepeoplebornclever,andothersbornstupid?Orisintelligence(智力)developedbyourenvironmentandourexperience?Stra
食管癌早期诊断简易而有效的方法是
转化作用叙述不正确的一项是
张某诉丁某债务纠纷一案已经由A县人民法院一审、B市中级人民法院二审终结。现人民检察欲对该案提出抗诉,应按何种程序进行?()
龚某,男,1989年7月1日出生,精神智力正常,2005年6月30日伙同林某(23岁,另案处理)绑架当地某私营企业主张某的儿子张小三,因勒赎不成而将被害人张小三杀害,则本案中龚某的行为如何?
_________起着支撑和确保项目信息门户正常运行的作用。()
关于货币市场基金说法不正确的是()。
某公司去年对组织机构做出了大规模的调整,但是一直未改变工作说明书。目前工作重叠,职责不清,管理分配不平衡等问题日益突出,工作缺乏效率,员工工作积极性降低,企业效益也降至最低点。可以选择的工作分析方法是()。
赵某与甲公司签订一份劳动合同,双方在合同中约定执行标准工时制,并约定甲公司根据生产经营需要可以直接安排赵某加班,但每月安排加班时间合计不得超过48小时,工资每月15日支付,遇法定休假日顺延至工作日支付。根据劳动合同法的有关规定,下列说法中正确的有()。
《中华人民共和国刑法》第16条规定:行为在客观上虽然造成了损害结果,但是不是出于故意或者过失,而是由于不能抗拒或者不能预见的原因所引起的,不是犯罪。请分析“不能抗拒”和“不能预见”的含义。
最新回复
(
0
)