首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
admin
2016-01-30
57
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other — hurl insults, even — and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it. It seems that our society favors a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims. The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong.
Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly consensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even. The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics — just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time — keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves — by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate; if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery — so cruel when practiced on the innocent — can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is to so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel quality if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I ’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
People have been brainwashed since early at school to believe that______.
选项
A、only those who are able to debate are intellectual
B、debating is the best solution to disagreements
C、the world is filled with war and conflict
D、the adversarial training is necessary for everyone
答案
B
解析
细节推断题。根据题干关键词brainwashed一词与第二段首句中的brain washing对应,对答案进行定位。事实上,brainwashing指代首段尾句中的society’s unquestioning belief。本题就是首段末句指出的社会所坚信的东西。故答案为B。本题与寻找文章的主题有关,只有选项B是作者讨论的主题。其他选项的某些词句虽然在文中涉及,但都与brainwashing或belief无关。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qhGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Ihavefeltforalongtimethataidtounderdevelopedcountriesshouldbeplacedinadefiniteandmorerationalorderofprior
(复旦大学2010年试题)Businessandgovernmentleadersconsidertheinflationratetobeanimportantgeneralindicator.Inflationis
Theprofessorcouldhardlyfindsufficientgrounds______hisargumentsinfavourofthenewtheory.(中南大学2006年试题)
(上海理工大学2006年试题)Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth
(浙江大学2008年试题)Theenergycrisis,whichisbeingfeltaroundtheworld,hasdramatizedhowthecarelessuseoftheearth’sre
Thebasiccausesareunknown,althoughcertainconditionsthatmayleadtocancerhavebeen______.
Televisionhasbecomequiteavigorousactivity.Sittingupisexhaustingsomostpeople______downwhilewatchingtelevision.
Anumberofresearchershavewrittenabouta"hiddencurriculum"inschools,definedasthesubtleinfluencesonstudentsthatr
Muchpersonalinformationaboutindividualsisnowstoredincomputerfiles.Anunauthorizedpersonwithaccesstothisinformat
Printmakingisthegenerictermforanumberofprocesses,ofwhichwoodcutandengravingaretwoprimeexamples.Printsaremad
随机试题
药物降低心肌自律性的方式有
翼腭窝位于
妊娠晚期无痛性反复阴道流血高血压、水肿、蛋白尿
水泥的性能主要取决于()。
下列项目中,属于形状公差的项目有()。
导致金融危机的首要因素是金融因素,其中涉及()。
根据票据法律制度的规定,下列选项中,属于禁止背书转让的汇票有()。
某电商准备“双十一”囤积一批货物,前10天囤积了1/3。后来改进了工作方式,效率比原来提高了25%,这样,完成全部任务比原计划提前的天数为:
某公司有员工100名,为调查员工的工作幸福感现状,该公司计划从这100名员工中抽取20名员工进行调查,100名员工中有y名年龄超过45岁,x名年龄不满35岁,员工年龄在36到44岁的有25名,为了使调查更科学,人力资源管理部门采取分层抽样的方法,从y名员工
目前我国微机上汉字内部码采用的是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)