首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
This election year, the debate over cloning technology has become a circus—and hardly anybody has noticed the gorilla hiding in
This election year, the debate over cloning technology has become a circus—and hardly anybody has noticed the gorilla hiding in
admin
2010-11-27
56
问题
This election year, the debate over cloning technology has become a circus—and hardly anybody has noticed the gorilla hiding in the tent. Even while President Bush has endorsed throwing scientists in jail to stop "reckless experiments", it’s just possible the First Amendment will protect researchers who want to perform cloning research.
Dr. Leon Kass, the chairman of the President’s Council on Bioethics, would like to keep that a secret. "I don’t want to encourage such thinking", he said. But the notion that the First Amendment creates a "right to research" has been around for a long time, and Kass knows it. In 1977, four eminent legal scholars—Thomas Emerson, Jerome Barron, Walter Berns and Harold P. Green—were asked to testify before the House Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space. At the time, there was alarm in the country over recombinant DNA. Some people feared clones, designer babies, a plague of superbacteria. The committee wanted to know if the federal government should, or could, restrict the science. "Certainly the overwhelming tenor of the testimony was in favor of protecting it", Barron, who now teaches at George Washington University, recalls.
Barns, a conservative political scientist, was forced to agree. He didn’t like this conclusion, because he feared the consequences of tinkering with nature, but even after consulting with Kass before his testimony, he told Congress that "the First Amendment protected this kind of research". Today, he believes it protects cloning experiments as well. Law-review articles written at the time supported Barns, and so would a report issued by Congress’s Office of Technology Assessment (O. T.A). But the courts never got the chance to face the right-to-research issue squarely. An oversight body called the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, formed by the National Institutes of Health, essentially allowed science to police itself. So the discussion was submerged until now.
Why legal scholars would defend the right to research is hardly mysterious. The founding fathers passionately defended scientific and academic freedom, and the Supreme Court has traditionally had a high regard for it. But why would the right to read, write and speak as you please extend to the tight to experiment in the lab?
Neoconservatives like Kass have emphasized the need to maintain a fixed conception of human nature. But the O.T.A. directly addressed this in a 1981 report. "Even if the rationale.., were expanded to include situations where knowledge threatens fundamental cultural values about the nature of man, control of research for such a reason probably would not be constitutionally permissible",
The government can restrict speech if it can prove a "compelling interest", like public safety or national security. But courts have set that bar very high. Unlike, say, an experiment that releases smallpox into the wind to study how it spreads, which could be banned, embryo research presents no readily apparent danger to public health or security. And if that’s the case, scientists who wish to create stem cells by cloning might have a new source of succor: the U.S. Constitution.
选项
A、identical.
B、similar.
C、complementary.
D、opposite.
答案
D
解析
本题问Kass和O.T.A.对克隆研究的态度怎样。第二段提到"But the notion that the First Amendment creates alright to research…and Kass knows it".可知第一修正案对克隆研究有保护作用,但是"Dr. Leon Kass...would like to keep that a secret".可知Kass不想让人们知道有法律在保护克隆研究,也就是说他不赞成对克隆的研究加以保护;而第三段提到Berns承认第一修正案保护克隆,又提到"Law-review articles…supported Berns,and so would a report issued by…(O.T.A.)".也就是说O.T.A.支持Berns的看法,即第一修正案支持克隆研究。而且第五段"But the O.T.A. directly addressed…Even if the rationale…control of research…would not be constitutionally permissible".’也明确表明O.T.A.反对对克隆研究的控制。因此"(两者的观点)相反的"正确。相同的、相似的、互补的均错。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qkZ4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothetext,stemcellsarehardtoobtainbecause_____.Successfulstemcellresearchwillhopefullyleadto_____.
Scientistshaveforthefirsttimeusedcloningtocreatehumanembryosthatlivelongenoughinalaboratorydishtohavetheir
Inthefollowingarticle,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ChoosethemostsuitableonethelistA—Gtofitintoeachofthenu
Thephrase"whistleblower"(Lastline,Paragraph3)probablymeans______.Accordingtothetext,whichofthefollowingstate
ThewriterbelievesthattheRepublicParty,infaceofthechallengefromitsopponents,should______.Whichofthefollowing
Japanesefirmshaveachievedthehighestlevelsofmanufacturingefficiencyintheworldautomobileindustry.(46)Someobservers
Japanesefirmshaveachievedthehighestlevelsofmanufacturingefficiencyintheworldautomobileindustry.(46)Someobservers
Tooffshoreservicesthatwereoncenon-tradableresultsfrom______.Accordingtothetext,ForresterResearchPredictionmigh
Politicalcontroversyaboutthepublic-landpolicyoftheUnitedStatesbeganwiththeAmericaRevolution.(1)_____,evenbefore
Opinionpollsarenowbeginningtoshowanunwillinggeneralagreementthat,whoeveristoblameandwhateverhappensfromnowo
随机试题
若f’(x0)=0,f’(x0)>0,则下列表述正确的是()
新生儿,生后3d发现明显青紫,呼吸急促,不吃奶,体检:心脏扩大无明显杂音,应首先想到可能是
导致心肌脂肪变性的原因有
A.胖大海B.马兜铃C.百部D.礞石E.海浮石
案情:河南周口益民公司,经营范围为管道燃气、燃气具、高新技术和房地产。2010年,原周口地区建设局批准该公司为周口城市管道燃气专营单位。在取得该批文后,益民公司先后取得燃气站与燃气管网铺设的许可证等批文。到一审判决时为止,该公司已经实际铺设了一些管道。20
甲公司2011年至2013年发生下列与长期股权投资相关的业务:(1)2011年1月7日,对联营企业投资,购入乙公司的股票100万股,占乙公司股份的25%,从而对乙公司的财务和经营政策有重大影响。该股票每股买入价为8元,其中每股含已宣告分派但尚未领取的现金
《读卖新闻》
甲乙丙三家公司分别出资51万元、30万元、19万元建造写字楼,约定建成后按投资比例使用,但对写字楼的管理和所有权归属未作约定。对此,下列说法正确的是()
Highstreetshopsuseavarietyofmeanstoattractshoppers,suchasstrikingwindowdisplays,hugered"Sale"signsandspecia
A、Hedoesn’thaveenoughmoneytobuyacar.B、Hereallydoesn’twanttobuyacar.C、heplanstobuyacarinalittlewhile.D
最新回复
(
0
)