首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
This election year, the debate over cloning technology has become a circus—and hardly anybody has noticed the gorilla hiding in
This election year, the debate over cloning technology has become a circus—and hardly anybody has noticed the gorilla hiding in
admin
2010-11-27
61
问题
This election year, the debate over cloning technology has become a circus—and hardly anybody has noticed the gorilla hiding in the tent. Even while President Bush has endorsed throwing scientists in jail to stop "reckless experiments", it’s just possible the First Amendment will protect researchers who want to perform cloning research.
Dr. Leon Kass, the chairman of the President’s Council on Bioethics, would like to keep that a secret. "I don’t want to encourage such thinking", he said. But the notion that the First Amendment creates a "right to research" has been around for a long time, and Kass knows it. In 1977, four eminent legal scholars—Thomas Emerson, Jerome Barron, Walter Berns and Harold P. Green—were asked to testify before the House Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space. At the time, there was alarm in the country over recombinant DNA. Some people feared clones, designer babies, a plague of superbacteria. The committee wanted to know if the federal government should, or could, restrict the science. "Certainly the overwhelming tenor of the testimony was in favor of protecting it", Barron, who now teaches at George Washington University, recalls.
Barns, a conservative political scientist, was forced to agree. He didn’t like this conclusion, because he feared the consequences of tinkering with nature, but even after consulting with Kass before his testimony, he told Congress that "the First Amendment protected this kind of research". Today, he believes it protects cloning experiments as well. Law-review articles written at the time supported Barns, and so would a report issued by Congress’s Office of Technology Assessment (O. T.A). But the courts never got the chance to face the right-to-research issue squarely. An oversight body called the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, formed by the National Institutes of Health, essentially allowed science to police itself. So the discussion was submerged until now.
Why legal scholars would defend the right to research is hardly mysterious. The founding fathers passionately defended scientific and academic freedom, and the Supreme Court has traditionally had a high regard for it. But why would the right to read, write and speak as you please extend to the tight to experiment in the lab?
Neoconservatives like Kass have emphasized the need to maintain a fixed conception of human nature. But the O.T.A. directly addressed this in a 1981 report. "Even if the rationale.., were expanded to include situations where knowledge threatens fundamental cultural values about the nature of man, control of research for such a reason probably would not be constitutionally permissible",
The government can restrict speech if it can prove a "compelling interest", like public safety or national security. But courts have set that bar very high. Unlike, say, an experiment that releases smallpox into the wind to study how it spreads, which could be banned, embryo research presents no readily apparent danger to public health or security. And if that’s the case, scientists who wish to create stem cells by cloning might have a new source of succor: the U.S. Constitution.
选项
A、identical.
B、similar.
C、complementary.
D、opposite.
答案
D
解析
本题问Kass和O.T.A.对克隆研究的态度怎样。第二段提到"But the notion that the First Amendment creates alright to research…and Kass knows it".可知第一修正案对克隆研究有保护作用,但是"Dr. Leon Kass...would like to keep that a secret".可知Kass不想让人们知道有法律在保护克隆研究,也就是说他不赞成对克隆的研究加以保护;而第三段提到Berns承认第一修正案保护克隆,又提到"Law-review articles…supported Berns,and so would a report issued by…(O.T.A.)".也就是说O.T.A.支持Berns的看法,即第一修正案支持克隆研究。而且第五段"But the O.T.A. directly addressed…Even if the rationale…control of research…would not be constitutionally permissible".’也明确表明O.T.A.反对对克隆研究的控制。因此"(两者的观点)相反的"正确。相同的、相似的、互补的均错。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qkZ4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Theword"interest"inthefirstparagraphmostprobablymeans_____.Accordingtothetext,whichofthefollowingstatements
Educationisoneofthekeywordsofourtime.Aman,withoutaneducation,manyofusbelieve,isanunfortunatevictimofunfo
EuthanasiahasbeenatopicofcontroversyinEuropesinceatleast1936.Onanaverageofsixtimesaday,adoctorinHolland
ThefirstdraftoftheEUconstitutionwasaimedat_____.Asecondroundoftalkswereopenedbysomeleaders,because_____.
There(1)_____notonetypeofreadingbutseveralaccordingtoyourreasonsforreading.Toreadcarefully,youhaveto(2)____
Inthefollowingarticle,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ChoosethemostsuitableonethelistA—Gtofitintoeachofthenu
Politicalcontroversyaboutthepublic-landpolicyoftheUnitedStatesbeganwiththeAmericaRevolution.(1)_____,evenbefore
Dr.Frankenstein’sremarksarementionedinthetext______.Fromthetext,welearnthatAldousHuxleyisoftheopinionthat
OfallthetruthsthatthisgenerationofAmericansholdself-evident,fewaremoredeeplyembeddedinthenationalpsychethan
MountingfinancialandlegalwoesaregivingMerckaprescription-strengthheadache.WithChiefExecutiveOfficerRayGilmartin
随机试题
58岁,绝经5年,半年来阴道出血3次,每次持续8~10天,量多,伴两乳胀痛。妇科检查:阴道未萎缩,宫颈光滑,外口见有较多透明分泌物,子宫正常大小,活动;右侧附件可触及8cm×7cm×7cm大小质地不均的囊性肿物,前壁实性感,表面光滑,活动,无压痛。阴道涂片
肺炎球菌肺炎选用( )急性左心衰、肺水肿选用( )
十恶重罪中直接侵犯皇权的犯罪有哪几项?
人和实业集团股份有限公司(以下简称“人和公司”)是一家在国内上市的大型多元化投资公司。人和公司实力雄厚,资金充裕。其全资拥有的人生地产代理有限公司(以下简称“人生公司”)是全国最大的连锁经营地产代理中介机构。人生公司在每个省分别设立分公司,统管该
按现行规定,在计算应纳税所得额时不得扣除的支出是()。
买卖国家禁止买卖的文物,尚不构成犯罪的,由()责令改正并没收违法所得。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
论述英、法推行绥靖正常的原因及其后果。
HelenKeller,aworld-famousauthorandpublicspeakersufferedfromastrange【B1】______whenshewasonly19monthsold.Itmad
Bloggingisapastimeformany,evenalivelihoodforafew.Forsome,itbecomesan【B1】______.Suchbloggersoftenfeelcompel
最新回复
(
0
)