首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Surviving the Recession America’s recession began quietly at the end of 2007. Since then it has evolved into a global crisis
Surviving the Recession America’s recession began quietly at the end of 2007. Since then it has evolved into a global crisis
admin
2013-08-23
45
问题
Surviving the Recession
America’s recession began quietly at the end of 2007. Since then it has evolved into a global crisis. Reasonable people may disagree about whom to blame. Financiers who were not as clever as they thought they were? Regulators falling asleep at work? Consumers who borrowed too much? Politicians who thoughtlessly promoted home-ownership for those who could not afford it? All are guilty; and what a mess they have created.
Since 2007 America has shed 5 million jobs. More than 15% of the workforce are jobless or underemployed—roughly 25 million workers. The only industries swelling their payrolls are health care, utilities and the federal government. The value of listed shares in American firms collapsed by 57% from its peak in October 2007 to a low in March this year, though it has since bounced back somewhat. Industrial production fell by 12.8% in the year to March, the worst slide since the Second World War. Mark Zandi, an economist at Moody’s Economy, com, predicts that the recession will shrink America’s economy by 3. 5% in total. For most executives, this is the worst business environment they’ve ever seen.
Times are so tough that even bosses are taking pay cuts. Median(中位数的)pay for chief executives of S&P 500 companies fell 6.8% in 2008. The overthrown business giants of Wall Street took the biggest knock, with average pay cuts of 38% and median bonuses of zero. But there was some pain for everyone: median pay for chief executives of non-financial firms in the S&P 500 fell by 2. 7% .
Nearly every business has a sad tale to tell. For example, Arne Sorenson, the president of Marriott hotels, likens the crisis to the downturn that hit his business after September 11th, 2001. When the twin towers fell, Americans stopped travelling. Marriott had its worst quarter ever, with revenues per room falling by 25% . This year, without a terrorist attack, the hotel industry is " putting the same numbers on the board" , says Mr Sorenson.
The hotel bust(不景气), like most busts, was preceded by a breathtaking boom. Although many other big firms resisted the temptation to over-borrow, developers borrowed heavily and built bigger and fancier hotels as if the whole world were planning a holiday in Las Vegas. When the bubble burst, demand collapsed. Hotel owners found themselves with a huge number of empty rooms even as a lot of unnecessary new hotels were ready to open.
Other industries have suffered even more. Large numbers of builders, property firms and retailers have gone bankrupt. And a disaster has hit Detroit. Last year the American car industry had the capacity to make 17 million vehicles. Sales in 2009 could be barely half of that. The Big Three American carmakers—General Motors, Ford and Chrysler—accumulated ruinous costs over the postwar years, such as gold-plated health plans and pensions for workers who retired as young as 48. All three are desperately restructuring. Only Ford may survive in its current form.
Hard times breed hard feelings. Few Americans understand what caused the recession. Some are seeking scapegoats(替罪羊). Politicians are happy to take advantage. Bosses have been summoned to Washington to be scolded on live television. The president condemns their greed.
Extravagance(奢侈)is out
Businessfolk are bending over backwards to avoid seeming extravagant. Meetings at resorts are suddenly unacceptable. Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, cancelled a conference in Las Vegas at the last minute and rebooked it in San Francisco, which cost more but sounded less fun.
Anyway, the pain will eventually end. American business will regain its shine. Many firms will die, but the survivors will emerge leaner and stronger than before. The financial sector’s share of the economy will shrink, and stay shrunk for years to come. The importance of non-financial firms will accordingly rise, along with their ability to attract the best talent. America will remain the best place on earth to do business, so long as Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress resist the temptation to interfere too much, and so long as organised labour does not overplay its hand.
The crisis will prove hugely disruptive(破坏性的), however. Bad management techniques will be exposed. Necessity will force the swift adoption of more efficient ones. At the same time, technological innovation(创新)will barely pause for breath, and two big political changes seem likely.
Mr Obama’s plan to curb carbon dioxide(C0
2
)emissions(排放), though necessary, will be far from cost-free, whatever his sunny speeches on the subject might suggest. The shift to a low-carbon economy will help some firms, hurt others and require every organisation that uses much energy to rethink how it operates. It is harder to predict how Mr Obama’s proposed reforms to the failing health-care system will turn out. If he succeeds in curbing costs—a big if—it would be a huge gain for America. Some businesses will benefit but the vast bulk of the savings will be captured by workers, not their employers.
In the next couple of years the businesses that thrive will be those that are tight with costs, careful of debt, cautious with cash flow and extremely attentive to what customers want. They will include plenty of names no one has yet heard of.
Times change, and corporations change with them. In 1955 Time’s Man of the Year was Harlow Curtice, the boss of GM. His firm was leading America towards " a new economic order" , the magazine wrote. Thanks to men like Curtice, "the bonds of scarcity" had been broken and America was rolling "to an all-time high of prosperity". Soon, Americans would need to spend "comparatively little time earning a living".
Half a century later GM is a typical example of poor management. In March its chief executive was fired by Time’s current Man of the Year, Mr Obama. The government now backs up the domestic car industry, lending it money and overseeing its turnaround plans. With luck, this will be short-lived. But there is a danger that Washington will end up micromanaging not only Detroit but also other parts of the economy. And clever as Mr Obama’s advisers are, history suggests they will be bad at this.
Because Harlow Curtice’s firm was leading America in creating "a new economic order", he was named by Time magazine as ______in 1955.
选项
答案
Man of the Year
解析
由句子结构可推知,空格处作as的宾语,应填入名词或名词短语。定位句提到,在1955年,《时代》杂志的年度人物是通用汽车的老板哈洛·科迪斯,由此可知,Man of the Year为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ql07777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Providingscientificandtechnicaladvicetothegovernmentandthepublic.B、Tellingpeoplehowmanyglassesofwatertodrin
A、Showingchildren’slivingconditions,socialstatus,culturalcustoms.B、Providingaspaceforchildren’scommunication.C、Sho
A、50%.B、20%.C、30%.D、allofit.C此题考查听特定信息即听数字的能力。解题的关键点在于抓住“Ialwaystake30%ofmysalaryandputitintoanotherbankacco
AmericansaremakingnewfriendsallthetimeandfewAmericansstayinoneplaceforalifetime.InGermanytiesoffriendship
A、Theyarealwaysright.B、Theyarealwayswrong.C、Theyare’sometimesrightbutsometimeswrong.D、Theyarehelpful.B该题答案在Th
A、Hehadn’tenoughmoney.B、HehadtoflybacktoSingapore.C、Hehadtoholdanimportantparty.D、Hehadtoparticipateinam
A、25minutes.B、24minutes.C、10minutes.D、7minutes.B
A、Physicsorchemistry.B、Englishorhistory.C、Anthropologyorpoliticalscience.D、Languageorphilosophy.A文中作者的观点是除非你的博士读的是像
A、It’sverytraditional.B、It’sterrific.C、It’stoomodern.D、It’senjoyable.C女士说这场戏并不精彩(notreally表明其观点),她更喜欢传统的戏剧。由此可推知这场戏剧表
随机试题
个人的性格、气质属于()
患儿,男,4岁,从2岁半开始补牙,至今仍有蛀牙,患儿家长前来找医生询问刷牙方法。有关刷牙不正确的观点是A.家长为儿童刷牙时,以握笔式持牙刷柄的方法操作较方便B.儿童不宜采用/顷刷法刷牙C.刷牙效果与所花时间有关D.刷牙效果与刷牙所用的压力有关E.
对刑法关于撤销假释的规定,下列哪些理解是正确的?()
按照风险来源的不同,利率风险可以分为()。
面谈后撰写的会谈纪要应力求()。
某公司2010年末的流动资产合计为800万元,其中包括存货360万元;流动负债合计为200万元。则该公司2010年末的速动比率为()。
(2020年)甲公司基本生产车间生产X和Y两种产品。供电和锅炉两个辅助生产车间分别为X产品、Y产品、行政管理部门提供动力和蒸汽,同时也相互提供服务。若采用直接分配法分配辅助生产费用,供电车间的生产费用不应分配给()。
教育活动中一对最基本、最重要的人际关系是()。
20世纪90年代,我国对外开放进入新阶段的标志是()。
简述我国《物权法》的基本原则。
最新回复
(
0
)