首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A Responsibility Revolution "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals," FDR said in 1937, in the mids
A Responsibility Revolution "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals," FDR said in 1937, in the mids
admin
2011-04-04
36
问题
A Responsibility Revolution
"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals," FDR said in 1937, in the midst of the Great Depression. "We know now that it is bad economies." We have learned this all. But even amid the Great Recession of 2009, people have been trading in their SUVs for Priuses, buying record amounts of fair-trade coffee and investing in socially responsible funds at higher rates than ever before. What we are discovering now, in the most uncertain economy since FDR’s time, is that enlightened self-interest—call it a shared sense of responsibility—is good economics.
America has always been a great laboratory of social innovation, from Ben Franklin’s creation of the volunteer fire department and the lending library to the rise of online collectives like Wikipedia and Facebook. Usually it has been an invention, some innovation in commerce—the car, the light bulb, the television—that has changed how we interact with one another as well as how we think of ourselves. We are again entering a period of social change as Americans are recalibrating(重新校准)our sense of what it means to be a citizen, not just through voting or volunteering but also through commerce: by what we buy. There is a new dimension to civic duty that is growing in America—it’s the idea that we can serve not only by spending time in our communities and classrooms but by spending more responsibly. We are starting to put our money where our ideals are.
According to a new TIME poll, more than 6 in 10 Americans have bought organic products since January. Lots of us have bought an energy-efficient light bulb too. And it’s not just the nature of the product but also its source that’s prompting us to buy. Of the 1,003 adults we polled this summer, 82% said they have consciously supported local or neighborhood businesses this year. Nearly 40% said they purchased a product in 2009 because they liked the social or political values of the company that produced it. That’s evidence of a changing mind-set, a new kind of social contract among consumers, business and government. We are seeing the rise of the citizen consumer—and the beginnings of a responsibility revolution.
Corporate America has discovered that social responsibility attracts investment capital as well as customer loyalty, creating a virtuous circle. With global warming on the minds of many consumers, lots of companies are racing to "outgreen" one another, a competition that is good for their bottom lines as well as the environment’s. The most progressive companies are talking about a triple bottom line—profit, planet and people—that focuses on how to run a business while trying to improve environmental and worker conditions.
Many corporations discovered that business was about a lot more than a profit-and-loss statement. At first, the corporate stance was defensive: companies were punished by consumers for unethical behavior. In the 1990s, companies like Nike and Walmart were attacked for discriminatory and unfair labor practices. Companies also began to realize that just as some consumers boycotted products they considered unethical, others would purchase products in part because their manufacturers were responsible.
Some companies embraced the new ethos early on. In 1992, Gap developed sourcing guidelines for its suppliers, and in 1996 the company put in effect a code of conduct for them. Since 2004, Gap has been publishing information about the factories it uses and those it has stopped doing business with. Last year HP followed suit, becoming one of the first computer manufacturers to apply similar transparency to its global supply chain. Timberland now prints a detailed label for its shoes, noting on each pair the company’s material and energy usage
None of this would have happened without consumer demand. Nearly half of Americans in our poll said protecting the environment should be given priority over economic growth—and this comes in the midst of a recession and historic unemployment. And 78% of those polled said they would be willing to pay $ 2,000 more for a car that gets 35 m. p. g. than for a similar one that gets only 25 m. p. g, Of course, consumers are doing their own doing-well-by-doing-good calculation: a more expensive ear that gets better gas mileage will save them money in the long run—and make them feel good about it in the process.
Many companies are trying to reconfigure their DNA as profit seekers. Take Walmart. Once the poster child of corporate ruthlessness, a retailer whose business model of undercutting(廉价销售)all of its competitors would have been applauded by Friedman, Walmart has resolved to change its way of doing business for the sake of the future of the planet. The company has required its suppliers to reduce packaging to protect the environment and is trying to boost sales of energy-efficient light bulbs by giving them more shelf space and better placement in stores. In July it announced it is developing a sustainability index that will one day show consumers at a glance how green its products are.
Other companies are improving their responsibility commitments. Intel, the world’s largest chipmaker, says it plans to increase investment this year in energy efficiency that will help the environment and cut costs. Mars and Cadbury have unveiled plans to increase the amount of cacao (可可豆)they harvest from sustainable sources because it is good for the environment and will also relieve potential shortages in the future. The high-end stroller company Bugaboo just announced it will start contributing 1% of its total revenues to the Global Fund that helps AIDS programs in Africa. That’s 1% of Bugaboo’s revenues, not profits.
One question is: How much of all this is just shrewd marketing to give companies a halo (光环)effect? Participants in these high-profile efforts have been criticized for spending a bundle on marketing. Meanwhile, a New York environmentalist named Jay Westerveld coined the term greenwashing for companies that spin their products as being more environmentally friendly than they really are.
That’s one reason why Walmart’s plan to standardize a sustainability index is so important. If companies are really improving their carbon footprint—and, one hopes, the way they treat their workers—in order to improve their image and engender consumer loyalty, isn’t that a net good thing? And if they are doing it exclusively to help their bottom line, so what? "I don’t care whether companies change for the love of the environment or because of their financial interest," says Geoffrey Heal, a Columbia Business School professor and the author of When Principles Pay. "The most sustainable solution is to have companies responding to financial incentives rather than their own feelings. "
It’s not just big companies that are doing well by doing good. Increasingly, social entrepreneurs are starting companies rather than nonprofits, to capitalize on the power of the market to create public benefit. And some of these entrepreneurs are choosing to form "B Corporations," a new corporate structure that requires enterprises to build into their foundation strong social and environmental standards for their operations. More than 220 companies, whose combined revenue tops $ 1 billion, have become B Corps since their certification began in 2007.
To improve its responsibility commitments, this year Intel plans to get their investment in energy efficiency ______.
选项
答案
increased
解析
根据题干关键词this year Intel定位到第九段第一句:Other companies are improving their responsibility commitments. Intel, the world’s largest chipmaker, says it plans to increase investment this year in energy efficiency...可知,其他公司也在提高他们的责任感承诺。英特尔作为世界最大的芯片制造商提出它计划增加今年节能的投资。题干中用get将plan to后面的内容变成了被动,故填入increased。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qro7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
MostpeoplesaythattheUSAismakingprogressinfightingAIDS,buttheydon’tknowthere’scureandstronglydisagreethat"t
Wecanbeginourdiscussionof"populationasglobalissue"withwhatmostpersonsmeanwhentheydiscuss"thepopulationproble
A、DirectingaFilmB、TheKeytoSuccessC、AWonderfulExperienceD、WorkingwithFilmStarsB预览选项可知,选项概括性较强,故本题可能考查的是短文主题。根据文中提到的
SuggestionsforYourWorkAnnieisalongtimesecretary/receptionistfortwoseniorvicepresidentsatabigcompany.Theyh
A、Inagrocerystore.B、Inabank.C、Inabookstore.D、Inapostoffice.A综合推断题。对话中提到了商店会员卡、刷卡消费、给杂货打包等,再结合男士最后所说的,在美国的杂货店里确实得做
A、Ecologists.B、Industrialists.C、Businessmen.D、Environmentalists.B分析选项可知,本题针对who提问。短文最后提到,环境保护者的观点会影响工业和技术的发展,故B项为答案。
Scholarsandstudentshavealwaysbeengreattravelers.Theofficialcasefor"academicmobility"isnowoftenstatedinimpress
A、Requireworkingparttimeandspongingoffrelatives.B、Providetheround-triptransportationfeetostudents.C、Offerstipend
A、TheArctic.B、WestAntarctic.C、Thenorthernhemisphere.D、Thesouthernhemisphere.B文中谈到,在过去气象专家更多地关注北极而现在却更多地关注南极西部地区。因此正确答案
Thegoalis______(是每个人都有机会接受高等教育)whoiswillingandcapableregardlessofhisfinancialsituation.
随机试题
近百年来,在达里湖地区,长期的干旱使多草的湿地大量萎缩,变成盐碱地。多草的湿地是鸭类、鹅类以及其他种类水鸟筑巢和孵化的场所。然而,随着湿地的不断萎缩,该地区赤麻鸭数量平均下降的速度却远低于天鹅数量平均下降的速度。如果以下哪项陈述为真,对上文中的不一致给出了
礼貌友善的问候用语,积极热情的问候态度是问候礼节的基本要求。
对全结构式教育观察特点描述错误的是()
申请医师执业注册时,以下可以注册的情形是
下列关于双胍类药物的描述不正确的是
下列说法中,符合下岗失业人员小额担保贷款遵循的原则是()。
经核查,征信服务中心如无法确认异议信息的正误,应()。
下列业务中,能够降低企业短期偿债能力的是()。
以下关于我国科技史,不正确的是()。
有以下程序,执行后的结果是#includemain(){chars[]="abcde";s+=2;printf("%d\n",s[0]);}
最新回复
(
0
)