首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Protests at the use of animals in research have taken a new and fearful character in Britain with attempted murder of two Britis
Protests at the use of animals in research have taken a new and fearful character in Britain with attempted murder of two Britis
admin
2015-01-31
42
问题
Protests at the use of animals in research have taken a new and fearful character in Britain with attempted murder of two British scientists by the terrorist technique of the pre-planted carbomb.
The research community will rightly be alarmed at
these developments
, which have two aims: to draw public attention and to frighten people working in research with animals. The scientists insist that everything should be done to identify those responsible for the crimes and to put them on trial. The Defense Research Society has taken the practical step of offering a reward of $10,000 for information leading to those responsible, but past experience is not encouraging. People are unlikely to be tempted by such offers. The professional police will similarly be confronted by the usual problem of finding a needle in a haystack.
That is why the intellectual community in Britain and elsewhere must act more actively in its own defense. There are several steps that can be taken, of which the chief one is to demand of all the organizations that exist with the declared aims of safeguarding the interests of animals that
they
should declare clearly where they stand on violence towards people. And it will not be enough for the chairman and chairwoman of these organizations to make placatory statements on behalf of all their members. These people should also undertake that it will be a test of continuing membership in their organizations that members and would-be members should declare that they will take no part in acts of violence against human beings. Even such undertakings would be fully effective: people, after all, can lie. But at least they would distinguish the organizations entitled to a continuing voice in the dialogue with the research community about the rights of animals in research from the organizations that deserve no say.
What does the underlined word "they" in paragraph 3 refer to?
选项
A、The organizations that will talk with research community.
B、The animal-protecting organizations.
C、Those who support the use of animals in research.
D、Those who support the animal-protecting organizations.
答案
B
解析
词汇题。 由题干可定位至第三段第二句,分析句子语法结构及理解句子意思可知.此处的they指的是all the organizations that exist with the declared aims ofsafeguarding the interests of animals即动物保护组织。故选项B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qrq7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Alotofpeopleinstinctivelybelieve—withoutreallyknowing—thatpoorreadersarenotespeciallysmart.Anewstudybyres
Alotofpeopleinstinctivelybelieve—withoutreallyknowing—thatpoorreadersarenotespeciallysmart.Anewstudybyres
Alotofpeopleinstinctivelybelieve—withoutreallyknowing—thatpoorreadersarenotespeciallysmart.Anewstudybyres
Alotofpeopleinstinctivelybelieve—withoutreallyknowing—thatpoorreadersarenotespeciallysmart.Anewstudybyres
Alotofpeopleinstinctivelybelieve—withoutreallyknowing—thatpoorreadersarenotespeciallysmart.Anewstudybyres
A、Peoplecaneasilyfightwitheachother.B、Conflictswithothersbecomeinevitable.C、Americansaretooconcernedabouttheir
ShoppersonBlackFriday,thetraditionalstartoftheholidayshoppingseasoninAmerica,arenotoriously(声名狼藉地)aggressive.Som
Theinnervoiceofpeoplewhoappearunconsciouscannowbeheard.Forthefirsttime,researchershavestruckupaconversation
Americanshavelongpridedthemselvesasbeingpartofanoptimisticsociety.ButanewresearchdescribesAmericansaspessimis
Americanshavelongpridedthemselvesasbeingpartofanoptimisticsociety.ButanewresearchdescribesAmericansaspessimis
随机试题
男性,58岁。突然呕血300ml,排不成形黑便2次共约200ml。查体:BP100/70mmHg,心率112次/分,心律齐,无杂音,腹软,脾肋下2cm,移动性浊音阳性。心电图示在V4、V5导联ST段水平下移1mm。下列处理错误的是
某社区卫生服务站负责社区内居民的预防、保健、医疗、康复和健康教育及计划生育。这属于社区护理的
具有Vitali反应的药物是
消化性溃疡并发急性肠穿孔时,不可能出现
对具备可再生能源利用条件的建筑,建设单位应当选择合适的可再生能源,用于采暖、制冷、照明和热水供应等。建设可再生能源利用设施,应当与建筑主体工程()。
入境货物的检验检疫工作程序是( )。
我国期货交易者交纳的保证金形式有()。
范畴错误,又称范畴谬误,是指将既有的属性归属到不可能应该拥有该属性的对象上,为语义学或存在论的错误。根据上述定义,下列不属于范畴错误的是:
ThesenewlyunearthedculturalrelicsontheoriginofChinesecharacters______theintelligenceofourremoteancestors.
(A)条件(1)充分,但条件(2)不充分。(B)条件(2)充分,但条件(1)不充分。(C)条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,但条件(1)和条件(2)联合起来充分。(D)条件(1)充分,条件(2)也充分。(E)条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,条
最新回复
(
0
)