首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
admin
2014-07-25
43
问题
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether multilateralist or unilateralist, American or European, have come to agree that the organization is in crisis. This week, a blue ribbon panel commissioned by the body’s secretary- general, Keri Annan, released its report on what to do about it.
The U. N. ’s sorry state became most obvious with the Iraq war. Those favoring the war were furious that after a decade of Security Council resolutions, including the last-chance Resolution 1441 threatening "serious consequences" if Iraq did not prove its disarmament, the U. N. could not agree to act. Anti-war types were just as frustrated that the world body failed to stop the war. But Iraq was not the U. N. ’s only problem. It has done little to stop humanitarian disasters, such as the ongoing horror in Sudan. And it has done nothing to stop Iran’s and North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Recognizing the danger of irrelevance, Mr. Annan last year told a 16-member panel, composed mainly of former government ministers and heads of government, to suggest changes. These fall broadly into two categories: the institutional and the cultural. The former has got most of the headlines -- particularly a call for changing the structure of the Security Council. But changes in the U. N. ’s working practices are crucial too.
Everyone agrees that the Security Council is an unrepresentative relic: of its 15 seats, five are occupied by permanent, veto-wielding members (America, Russia, China, Britain and France) and ten go to countries that rotate every two years and have no veto. But that the council’s composition is a throwback to the world order immediately after the Second World War has been agreed on for decades, without any success in changing it. Japan and Germany, the secondand thirdbiggest contributors to the U.N. budget, believe they are entitled to permanent seats. So does India, the world’s second-most- populous country, and Brazil, Latin America’s biggest. Unlike in previous efforts, these four have finally banded together to press their case. And they are joined in spirit by the Africans, who want two seats for their continent.
But each aspirant has opponents. Italy opposes a permanent seat for Germany, which would make Italy the only biggish European power. It instead proposes a single seat for the European Union, a non- starter since this would require Britain and France to give up theirs, and regional institutions cannot be U.N. members under the current U.N. Charter. Spanish-speaking Mexico and Argentina do not think Portuguese-speaking Brazil should represent Latin America, and Pakistan strongly opposes its rival India’s bid. As for potential African seats, Egypt claims one as the representative of the Muslim and Arab world. That would leave Nigeria, the continent’s most populous country, and South Africa, which is richer and a more stable democracy, fighting for the other.
The panel has proposed two alternatives. The first would give six countries (none is named but probably Germany, Japan, India, Brazil and two African countries) permanent seats without a veto, and create three extra non-permanent seats, bringing the total number of council members to 24. The second, which would expand the council by the same number of seats, creates a new middle tier of members who would serve for four years and could be immediately re-elected, above the current lower tier of two-year members, who cannot be re-elected. The rivals to the would-be permanent members favor this option.
While Security Council reform may be the most visible of the proposals, the panel has also shared its views on the guidelines on when members may use force legally. Under the U. N. Charter, they can do so in two circumstances only: Article 51 allows force in a clear case of self-defense, and Chapter permits its use when the Security Council agrees. While the panelists have not proposed major changes to these two parts of the Charter, they have offered refinements.
Though the Charter was written to govern war between countries, the panel argues that even without revision, Chapter W lets the Security Council authorize force for more controversial, modem reasons like fighting terrorists and intervention in states committing humanitarian horrors. It even considers "preventive" wars against serious but non-imminent threats potentially justifiable.
But the panel also says any decision to use force must pass five tests: the threat must be grave; the primary purpose must be to avert the threat; force must be a last resort; means must be proportional; and there must be a reasonable chance that force will succeed without calamitous consequences. All common-sense stuff, but the panel proposes making these tests explicit (if subjective and unofficial), thus raising the quality of debate about any decision to go to war.
On top of this, the report urges the U.N. to make better use of its assets in the fight against terrorism. One of the obstacles to an effective counter-terrorism strategy has been U.N. members’ inability to agree on a definition of terrorism. The panel tries to help by defining it as "any action that is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants"; Arab countries may continue to press for exemptions in the case of "foreign occupation". The report also deals with what it sees as a possible "cascade of nuclear proliferation" in the near future. It recommends creating more incentives for countries to stop enriching uranium.
选项
答案
C
解析
推断题。由第二段可知联合国一方面没有对伊拉克采取有效的措施,未能满足支持对伊战争一派的期望;另一方面也没有有效地阻止包括伊拉克战争在内的一系列humanitarian disasters(人类的灾难),未能达到反战一派的期望。选项C是对原文的同义改写,只是将原句进行了简化,故正确。选项A和B均与原文意思直接相反,选项D原文未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/r0pO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Somepeopleholdtheviewthatastudent’ssuccessinuniversitystudyfollowsthesamepatternasthatoffarming,whichischa
WhichofthefollowingpoemsisNOTwrittenbyAlfredTennyson.
Eliotwaswrappedupin______whenhebegantowritepoems.WhichofthefollowingisNOTEliot’spoem?
AIDwillnowconcentrateonsustainabledevelopmentprogramsinsomefiftynationsfocusingonkeyareasnotincluding______.
ReadingontheInternetI.AdolescentInternetreaders1)Alicia—Sheisgoodat(1)_____informationonline.—Shebelievesthat
Boardofdirectorsisagroupofpeopleresponsibletogovernanorganizationbysettingstrategicdirection,establish
Itistakenasagreatcontributionmadeby______thatlanguagesintheworldareclassifiedintodifferentlanguagefamiliesa
长江是世界上第四大河。在那里现正在进行世界上最大的大坝一一三峡大坝的建设。按照三峡大坝设计者的观点,大坝可以把洪水挡在新的大水库里,从而防止洪水对华中和华东地区的侵犯。大坝还可以为三分之一的中国人提供占全国总发电量九分之一的电能,这样,每年可节约五千万吨煤
Whichofthefollowingcountrieshasthemostimmigrants?
WeareevenfartherremovedfromtheunfocusednewspaperreviewspublishedinEnglandbetweentheturnofthe20thcenturyandt
随机试题
土壤化学污染中最主要的问题是
以下关于甲和二组所签用地协议的说法正确的是( )。甲在刘营村的宅基地和自留地属于( )。
适合石材干挂的基层是()。
基坑开挖前,应根据()、施工方法、施工工期和地面荷载等资料,制定基坑施工方案。
按照现行规定,我国的混合资本债券具有的基本特征是()
Ms.Adamsishopingthatthecommitteeofficerswillconsider______requestforanewcomputersystemsoon.
阅读下面材料,回答问题。材料一德意志帝国首相俾斯麦说:“我们位于欧洲中部。我们至少有三条会遭到进攻的路线,而法国却只有一条东部的边界,俄国只有在西部的边界上有遭到进攻的可能。我们所需要的是法国让我们安宁,要防止法国——假如它不愿和我们保持和平
“可抢占”和“不可抢占”的优先级调度算法相比,()。
根据股利政策的税差理论,投资者偏好以资本利得的方式获得投资回报的主要原因是()。
Theorganizationwasboldenoughtofacethepress.
最新回复
(
0
)