首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
admin
2014-07-25
42
问题
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether multilateralist or unilateralist, American or European, have come to agree that the organization is in crisis. This week, a blue ribbon panel commissioned by the body’s secretary- general, Keri Annan, released its report on what to do about it.
The U. N. ’s sorry state became most obvious with the Iraq war. Those favoring the war were furious that after a decade of Security Council resolutions, including the last-chance Resolution 1441 threatening "serious consequences" if Iraq did not prove its disarmament, the U. N. could not agree to act. Anti-war types were just as frustrated that the world body failed to stop the war. But Iraq was not the U. N. ’s only problem. It has done little to stop humanitarian disasters, such as the ongoing horror in Sudan. And it has done nothing to stop Iran’s and North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Recognizing the danger of irrelevance, Mr. Annan last year told a 16-member panel, composed mainly of former government ministers and heads of government, to suggest changes. These fall broadly into two categories: the institutional and the cultural. The former has got most of the headlines -- particularly a call for changing the structure of the Security Council. But changes in the U. N. ’s working practices are crucial too.
Everyone agrees that the Security Council is an unrepresentative relic: of its 15 seats, five are occupied by permanent, veto-wielding members (America, Russia, China, Britain and France) and ten go to countries that rotate every two years and have no veto. But that the council’s composition is a throwback to the world order immediately after the Second World War has been agreed on for decades, without any success in changing it. Japan and Germany, the secondand thirdbiggest contributors to the U.N. budget, believe they are entitled to permanent seats. So does India, the world’s second-most- populous country, and Brazil, Latin America’s biggest. Unlike in previous efforts, these four have finally banded together to press their case. And they are joined in spirit by the Africans, who want two seats for their continent.
But each aspirant has opponents. Italy opposes a permanent seat for Germany, which would make Italy the only biggish European power. It instead proposes a single seat for the European Union, a non- starter since this would require Britain and France to give up theirs, and regional institutions cannot be U.N. members under the current U.N. Charter. Spanish-speaking Mexico and Argentina do not think Portuguese-speaking Brazil should represent Latin America, and Pakistan strongly opposes its rival India’s bid. As for potential African seats, Egypt claims one as the representative of the Muslim and Arab world. That would leave Nigeria, the continent’s most populous country, and South Africa, which is richer and a more stable democracy, fighting for the other.
The panel has proposed two alternatives. The first would give six countries (none is named but probably Germany, Japan, India, Brazil and two African countries) permanent seats without a veto, and create three extra non-permanent seats, bringing the total number of council members to 24. The second, which would expand the council by the same number of seats, creates a new middle tier of members who would serve for four years and could be immediately re-elected, above the current lower tier of two-year members, who cannot be re-elected. The rivals to the would-be permanent members favor this option.
While Security Council reform may be the most visible of the proposals, the panel has also shared its views on the guidelines on when members may use force legally. Under the U. N. Charter, they can do so in two circumstances only: Article 51 allows force in a clear case of self-defense, and Chapter permits its use when the Security Council agrees. While the panelists have not proposed major changes to these two parts of the Charter, they have offered refinements.
Though the Charter was written to govern war between countries, the panel argues that even without revision, Chapter W lets the Security Council authorize force for more controversial, modem reasons like fighting terrorists and intervention in states committing humanitarian horrors. It even considers "preventive" wars against serious but non-imminent threats potentially justifiable.
But the panel also says any decision to use force must pass five tests: the threat must be grave; the primary purpose must be to avert the threat; force must be a last resort; means must be proportional; and there must be a reasonable chance that force will succeed without calamitous consequences. All common-sense stuff, but the panel proposes making these tests explicit (if subjective and unofficial), thus raising the quality of debate about any decision to go to war.
On top of this, the report urges the U.N. to make better use of its assets in the fight against terrorism. One of the obstacles to an effective counter-terrorism strategy has been U.N. members’ inability to agree on a definition of terrorism. The panel tries to help by defining it as "any action that is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants"; Arab countries may continue to press for exemptions in the case of "foreign occupation". The report also deals with what it sees as a possible "cascade of nuclear proliferation" in the near future. It recommends creating more incentives for countries to stop enriching uranium.
选项
答案
C
解析
推断题。由第二段可知联合国一方面没有对伊拉克采取有效的措施,未能满足支持对伊战争一派的期望;另一方面也没有有效地阻止包括伊拉克战争在内的一系列humanitarian disasters(人类的灾难),未能达到反战一派的期望。选项C是对原文的同义改写,只是将原句进行了简化,故正确。选项A和B均与原文意思直接相反,选项D原文未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/r0pO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Theaimofajobinterviewistoestablishwhetheryouarelikelytodowellinaparticularjobinaspecificorganization.T
Whichofthefollowingstatementsistrueofthevocalcords?
______meansthelackofalogicalconnectionbetweentheformofsomethinganditsexpressioninsounds.
Boardofdirectorsisagroupofpeopleresponsibletogovernanorganizationbysettingstrategicdirection,establish
"Underprivilegedpeople"isoftenusedbythemassmediaasasubstitutefor"poorpeople".Linguistimlly,theformerisreferre
WhichofthefollowinghistoriceventsisoflittlesignificancetoAmerica?
Inrecentyears,moreandmorecollegestudentshavebeenworkingintheirsparetime.Somepeoplethinkitaffectsstudents’st
Women’smindsworkdifferentlyfrommen.Atleast,thatiswhat【M1】______mostmenareconvincedof.Psychologistsvi
Ofallthesymbols,______,whichareconsideredtorepresentfertilityandnewlife,arethosemostfrequentlyassociatedwithE
Asystemofarbitraryvocalsymbolsusedforhumancommunicationiscalled
随机试题
在妇女社会工作中,应用社会工作的个案、小组和社区方法时,一定要加入(),遵循妇女社会工作的实践原则。
在房地产业的开发阶段,其生产结构主要有哪些内容?
人们在房地产开发或投资活动中,为实现某种预定的开发、经营目标而预先垫支的资金称为()。
重视工程咨询业道德规划建设的意义在于()。
H.S的编排结构是将所有国际贸易商品按生产部门分为类;在各类内,基本上按同一起始原料或同一类型的产品设章,共有()章。
在估计可持续增长率时,通常假设内部融资的资金来源主要是()。(2010年下半年)
进口货物的增值税纳税义务发生时间为()。
测验结果的准确性或有效性的程度是()
2019年12月4日,中共中央、国务院印发《关于营造更好发展环境支持民营企业改革发展的意见》,充分肯定了我国民营经济的地位和作用,提出了有力举措,为民营企业未来发展指明方向,下列与之相关的说法错误的是:
Communitycancerclustersareviewedquitedifferentlybycitizenactiviststhanbyepidemiologists.Environmentalistsandconce
最新回复
(
0
)