首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Replying to our Christmas "good guru guide", Peter Drunker, the grand old man of management theory, speculated that the word "gu
Replying to our Christmas "good guru guide", Peter Drunker, the grand old man of management theory, speculated that the word "gu
admin
2011-02-11
67
问题
Replying to our Christmas "good guru guide", Peter Drunker, the grand old man of management theory, speculated that the word "guru" had become popular only because "charlatan" was too long a word for most headlines. Few people are easier to ridicule than management gums. Irrepressible self-publicists and slavish fashion-merchants, they make a splendid living out of recycling other people’s ideas ("chaos management"), coining euphemisms ("downsizing") and laboring the obvious ("managing by wandering around" or the customer is king"). Their books draw heavily on particular case studies—often out-of-date ones that have nasty knack of collapsing later. And their ideas change quickly. Tom Peters, once a self-confessed sycophant to the corporate behemoth, is now an apostle of the small, chaotic, "virtual" organization.
Gurus do have their uses, however. Begin with the circumstantial evidence. In America, where management theories are treated with undue reverence, business is bouncing back. In Germany, where business schools hardly exist and management theory is widely seen as an oxymoron, many companies are in trouble. German business magazines are suddenly brimming with articles about "downsizing" and "business process re-engineering". In Japan firms are once again turning to business theories from America—just as their fathers learnt after the Second World War from American quality-control techniques. Coincidence does not prove causation: American firms were just as much in love with gurus when they ware doing badly. But the fact that Germans and Japanese are paying attention again does offer some dues. The most important point in favor of management theories is that they are on the side of change. In 1927 a group of psychologists studying productivity at Western Electric’s Hawthorne factory in Illinois found that workers increased their output whenever the level of lighting was changed, up or down. At the very least, theorists can make change easier by identifying problems, acting as scapegoats for managers—or simply making people think. A vested interest in change can lead to faddism. But, taken with a requisite dose of scepticism, it can be fine complacency-shaker.
A second argument for gurus relates to knowledge. The best management theorists collect a lot of information about what makes firms successful. This varies from the highly technical, such as how to discount future cash flow, to softer organizational theories. Few would dispute the usefulness of the first. It is in the second area—the land of "flat hierarchies’ and "multi-functional teams"—that gums have most often stumbled against or contradicted each other. This knowledge is not obviously prodding a strategic recipe for success: there are too many variables in business, and if all competitors used the same recipe it would automatically cease to work. But it does provide something managers want: information about, and understanding of, other companies experience in trying out tactics—thinner management structures, handing power to workers, performance-related pay, or whatever.
A good analogy may be with diets. There is no such thing as the "correct" diet, but it is clear that some foods, in some quantities, axe better for you than others: and it is also likely that the main virtue of following a diet is not what you eat but the fact that it forces you to think about it. If management diets come with a lot of hype and some snake-oil, so be it.
Which of the following rifles is the most appropriate for the passage?
选项
A、In Defense of the Gum.
B、A Sharp Word for the Guru.
C、the Weakness of the Gum,
D、Gums—a Guarantee for Success.
答案
A
解析
主旨大意题,问四个选项中哪个最适合做文章的标题。这是一种主旨题的变体,问文章标题实际上就是问文章主旨,最符合主旨的标题就是答案。本文的主旨是第二段的第一句话(详见文章大意)“尽管如此,专家还是有其用的。”四个选项比较而言,A“为专家辩护”最合适,故为正解,B“对专家之批判”和C“专家之缺陷”都是文章中矛盾的次要方面,与主题不符,错。D“专家——成功之保障”程度过了,文章只承认专家有点用,但用处有多大并没提,更没上升到成功之保障的高度,故放弃。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rBYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AtthebeginningofARoseforEmily,FaulknerusesafigurativelanguagetodescribetheplacewhereEmilylives.Thehouseis
Toseehowbigcarrierscouldcontroltheonlineworld,youmustunderstanditsstructures.EarthlinkgivesJenniferaccesstot
DawnaWalterisoneoftheauthorsleadingthewayinBritainwithherbookthatattemptstohowevenatidy【M1】______sockd
DawnaWalterisoneoftheauthorsleadingthewayinBritainwithherbookthatattemptstohowevenatidy【M1】______sockd
A、callingoutadoctortoseehimB、findingoutadoctor’sconsultinghoursC、findingoutwhetherheneedstomakeanappointmen
StatisticⅠ.Thedefendantisguiltyornot?Expert:1)ADNAsample【1】______defendant’s.
OnwhichofthefollowingstreetsisthefinancialcentreoftheUSlocated?
Jealousy’sPurposeGoodmorning,everyone.Today’slecturewillfocusonacommonpsychologicalproblem—jealousy.Evolutionar
Duringthetraditionalweddingceremony,theCD#6bridalcouplepromiseseachotherlifelong【M1】______devotion.Yet,a
我时常收到好心的编辑寄来的电脑报刊,面对那些每个字都认识、就是看不懂的天书”,心想,这不是给文盲寄报刊吗?说来惭愧,别说上网,我连打字都不会,几次走近电脑,几次又离开它,它一点儿也不让我感到亲近。我怕一切机器,怕那些键子,那个蹦来蹦去的鼠标。让我感到安慰的
随机试题
人民检察院的办案组织形式包括独任检察官、__________和检察委员会。
18岁,女性,突然剧烈头痛、伴呕吐,查体:颈项强直,克氏征(+),布氏征(+),体温37.0℃,既往身体健康。CT示双侧裂池及纵裂池内等密度影。病人每日尿量必须保证超过()
热容量的单位J和HU的关系是
化脓性颌骨骨髓炎的感染途径主要是
公司实施剩余股利政策,意味着()。
实际分析是一种避开价值判断,企图描述经济活动和经济现象发生和发展过程,以解释经济现象之间的内在联系,解释有关变量之间的因果关系,分析预测经济活动后果的研究方面。()
由于各种商品价格变化的繁复和统计上的困难,一般用()来表示价格总水平的变化。
建立社会主义市场经济体制,就是要使市场在国家宏观调控下对社会资源的配置起基础性作用。()
A、 B、 C、 D、 D
经济处于充分就业均衡时,()。
最新回复
(
0
)