首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2010-02-17
80
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about I millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is ______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner
答案
D
解析
主旨题。文章一开始就提出了“电会致癌吗?”这个问题。下面更是围绕电力对癌症产生影响的不同观点来展开论述的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rE9K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theaimofajobinterviewistoestablishwhetheryouarelikelytodowellinaparticularjobinaspecificorganization.Thi
Itneverrainsbutitpours.Justasbossesandboardshavefinallysortedouttheirworstaccountingandcompliancetroubles,a
Aneweraisuponus.Callitwhatyouwill:theserviceeconomy,theinformationage,theknowledgesociety.Italltranslates
Themanhasnotbeenableto______recently.
WhichofthefollowingpersonalinformationaboutthemanisNOTtrue?
Videorecordersandphotocopiers,eventicketmachinesontherailway,oftenseemunnecessarilydifficulttouse.LastDecember
Untilrelativelyrecently,sportsfilmsrarelysucceededattheboxoffice.Sportsfilms,whichwereconsideredmoviesforyoung
Primarybatteriesorcellsare_______,oncedischarged,arediscarded.
Amillionmotoristsleavetheircarsfilledupwithpetrolandwiththekeysintheignitioneveryday.Thevehiclesaresitting
Petrolismanufacturedfromthe______oilwetakeoutoftheground.
随机试题
等渗性缺水伴酸中毒患者,在补充碱性溶液纠正酸中毒后,可能发生
男,21岁。因上前牙扇形移位就诊,无吸烟史。临床检查:全口牙面少量菌斑,牙石(+),上切牙唇向移位,牙间隙。右下第一磨牙根分叉外露,根分义病变Ⅲ度。X线显示:切牙牙槽骨吸收至根长1/2,第一磨牙近远中骨角形吸收至腭根1/2~2/3。其父在40岁前后多数牙齿
Ⅲ级生物安全柜的特点是
A.温肺散寒,化痰平喘B.散寒宜肺,化痰降逆C.清热宣肺,化痰定喘D.涤痰利窍,泻肺平喘E.清热化痰,降气平喘
(2009年)一个气缸内储有一定量的单原子分子理想气体,在压缩过程中外界做功209J,此过程气体内能增量120J,外界传给气体的热量为()J。
沪宇公司为一般纳税企业,适用的增值税税率为17%,采用实际成本进行存货日常核算。该公司2008年5月份发生的相关经济业务如下:(1)2日,公司用银行承兑汇票购买原材料一批,增值税专用发票上注明价款为600000元,增值税额为102000元,材料当即验收入
学生、学习过程和学习情境三大要素相对稳定的组合模式称之为()
雕塑:青铜:花岗岩
设y=f(x)由cos(xy)+lny一x=1确定,则
Impatiencecharacterizesyoungintellectualworkers.Theywanttomaketheirmark(31).Soit’simportanttoget(32)tothemin
最新回复
(
0
)