首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2010-02-17
91
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about I millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is ______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner
答案
D
解析
主旨题。文章一开始就提出了“电会致癌吗?”这个问题。下面更是围绕电力对癌症产生影响的不同观点来展开论述的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rE9K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theaimofajobinterviewistoestablishwhetheryouarelikelytodowellinaparticularjobinaspecificorganization.Thi
Allpeoplehavesomeabilitytomanagetheirhealthandthehealthofthosetheycarefor.Meanwhile,withtheincreasingcomple
Whollyasidefromaestheticandmoralconsiderations,fashionisaneconomicabsurdity,andthereislittletobesaidinitsfa
Whollyasidefromaestheticandmoralconsiderations,fashionisaneconomicabsurdity,andthereislittletobesaidinitsfa
Themanhasnotbeenableto______recently.
TheCompetitionamongproducersofpersonalcomputersisessentiallyaracetogetthebest,mostinnovativeproductstothemar
Clearlyifwearetoparticipateinthesocietyinwhichwelivemustcommunicatewithotherpeople.Agreatdealofcommunicati
WhenMr.Greenwasawayonbusiness,hisneighborgavehiswifea(n)______withthehousework.
Hespokeinwhispers______theservantsshouldhearhim.
随机试题
岳父:泰山
中国的烟草专卖制度,使得烟草企业必须按照专卖程序选择渠道。造成这一现象的主要原因是()
上颌基骨宽度的扩大,应在腭中缝完全融合前,一般在
患者,男,52岁。感冒、咳嗽1周余,气短、心悸3天,活动受限,咳白色泡沫样痰,尿少,症状明显加重1天来院。12年前诊断为“扩张型心肌病,心房颤动”,因反复发生心力衰竭多次住院。该患者可能出现的体征有1.贫血貌2.颈静脉怒张3.肺部限局性哮鸣音4
患者,女,29岁。月经后期4~5日,量少,经期乳房胀痛,伴有头晕目眩,纳呆,乏力,口燥咽干,舌淡红,脉弦而虚。治宜选用
下列()不是勘察阶段监理的工作内容。
由分保分出入与分保接受人签订协议,对每一危险单位损失或者一次巨灾事故的累积责任损失,规定一个自赔额,自赔额以上至一定限度由分保接受人负责的分保方式是( )分保。
下列属于商业银行流动资金贷款贷前调查内容的有()。
微软此前Windows系统的商业盈利大部分是靠向硬件厂商收取授权费用实现。如果沿用这种商业模式,则除非Window8优秀到足以吸引大量平板电脑用户,否则Windows8很有可能在平板电脑上得不到更多厂商的支持。然而如果采用免费模式,那么微软现有的商业体系将
法律规则是法律的基本构成因素。下列关于法律规则分类的表述哪一项可以成立?()
最新回复
(
0
)