首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Miss Wang has met Professor Kennedy before.
Miss Wang has met Professor Kennedy before.
admin
2009-06-24
75
问题
Miss Wang has met Professor Kennedy before.
Kennedy: Come in, please.
Wang: Good afternoon, Professor Kennedy.
Kennedy: Good afternoon. I have been expecting your first visit to my home.
Wang: It is an honor to be invited to meet you at your home.
Kennedy: My honor, too. Have a seat and be at home.
Wang: Thank you.
Kennedy: Coffee or some juice?
Wang: Juice will be all right.
Wang: Thanks....Very nice apple juice.
Kennedy: You seemed to have told me that you are from Shandong, where you grow very good apples.
Wang: Yes, you certainly have a very good memory since there are about 50 students in our class.
Kennedy: But not so many Chinese, ha, ha, ha...
Wang: I’ve been in the U.S. for more than three years, and I have been convinced that the American people are enjoying very good material life.
Kennedy: You are right partly, I’m afraid. You should know the other side of the matter.
Wang: What do you mean exactly?
Kennedy: Well, the Americans are wasting the most materials in the world, too.
Wang: I’ve heard so. But I don’t know much about it.
Kennedy: Oh, it’s easy to know. If you go look into garbage cans, you’ll find that the average family wastes at least $150 per year in food.
Wang: Wow, that’s unbelievable!
Kennedy: That’s true. Homemakers go out of their way to save pennies at store and they don’t realize that waste of edible foods adds up much more at home.
Wang: This is interesting. People save at stores but waste more at home.
Kennedy: That is the point. American families throw out between 8 and 20% of edible food at a cost of $4.5 billion per year.
Wang: Gee, that’s almost as much as the federal government spending every year for food stamps and child nutrition programs. I learned the figure in my class.
Kennedy: Good.
Wang: But on what did you base your estimates?
Kennedy: I based my estimates on an annual garbage collection study by my Arizona research group, measuring food wasted in the Tucson area.
Wang: But is the Tucson area typical?
Kennedy: Well, I know it is rather presumptuous to make national estimates based on Tucson-area studies. But...there’s no other data available.
Wang: No doubt your study is very valuable.
Kennedy: In somewhat of a paradox, food items which are costly and in short supply tend to be wasted more...
Wang: Is that so?
Kennedy: Yes. During the 1983 meat shortage, meat waste increased to 9%, compared with 3% in 1984 and 1985.
Wang: Is it because meat easily gets bad?
Kennedy: No. Sugar and sugar products waste jumped to 19% in 1985, 5% higher, when sugar prices doubled from the previous year.
Wang: What conclusion have you drawn from your study, Professor Kennedy?
Kennedy: My conclusion is that high prices force consumers to experiment, sometimes buying in large quantities. In the case of meat, sometimes low-priced cuts or unappetizing varieties are purchased. Consumers then tend to waste more. The more variety in food bought, the more wasted.
Wang: Very amazing.
Kennedy: There are more examples. You see, regular bread is wasted at about a 10% rate, but specialty breads and rolls are wasted at a 20% rate.
Wang: Why is that?
Kennedy: If people are eating the same thing every day, they learn how to manage it. But if you’re trying to pull something out of the Captain Bochelle cookbook every night, there’s bound to be some waste.
Wang: But aren’t you talking about the middle class or the rich families?
Kennedy: Oh, so long as the lower-income families are concerned, in the Tucson area, they waste less food than middle and upper-income families. And the study found that dog food, which accounts for 8% of a shopping cart, is rarely wasted.
Wang: Ha, dogs know better the value of food!
Kennedy: I have never thought of that!
Wang: This is really an interesting topic to study in. I’ve certainly learned a lot this afternoon. I really want to talk to you more, but I’m afraid I have to be going, for I have another appointment at 5:00.
Kennedy: It’s nice to talk to you. Please come any time you want.
Wang: Thank your very much, Professor Kennedy. Good-bye.
Kennedy: See you later.
选项
A、Right
B、Wrong
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rMHd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
AmericanWedding"Ido."ToAmericans,thosetwowordscarrygreatmeaning.Theycanevenchangeyourlife,especiallyifyou
WorkingMothersCarefullyconductedresearchesthathavefollowedthechildrenofworkingmothershavenotbeenabletoshow
WorkingMothersCarefullyconductedresearchesthathavefollowedthechildrenofworkingmothershavenotbeenabletoshow
NaturalMedicinesSinceearliestdays,humanshaveusedsomekindsofmedicines.Weknowthisbecausehumanshavesurvived.An
WhichofthefollowingisNOTrequiredofacontainer?WhydidtheauthorgotoNewYorkCity?
60thAnniversaryCeremonyinMoscow1.WiththousandsofsoldiersandwarveteransparadingacrossMoscow’sRedSquareandf
SendingE-mailstoProfessorsOnestudentskippedclassandthensenttheprofessorane-mail(51)forcopiesofherteaching
HuntingforaJobHuntingforajoblastyear,lawyerGantRedmonstumbledacrossCareerBuilder,ajobdatabaseontheInter
CrystalEarOnedayafriendaskedmywifeJillifIwantedahearingaid."Hecertainlydoes."repliedJill.Afterhearing
随机试题
社会工作者小陈在与服务对象小强的面谈中了解到,小强学习成绩不好,平时做作业拖沓,不认真。于是,社会工作者与小强协商制定了具体服务介入的目标,下列目标中,符合社会工作目标制订要求的是()。
甲曾向乙借款9000元,后不想归还借款,便预谋毒死乙。甲将注射了“毒鼠强”的白条鸡挂在乙家门上,乙怀疑白条鸡有毒未食用。随后,甲又乘去乙家串门之机,将“毒鼠强”投放到乙家米袋内。后乙和其妻子、女儿喝过米汤中毒,乙死亡,其他人经抢救脱险。关于甲的行为,下列哪
下列关于地漏的叙述错误的是()
在建设工程项目的招标活动中,某投标人以低于成本的投价竞标,则()。
自2004年起,对封闭式证券投资基金管理人运用基金买卖股票、债券的差价收入暂免征营业税,而对开放式证券投资基金管理人运用基金买卖股票、债券的差价收入需征收营业税。()
2017年4月1日之后,对于已经公布但尚未公告授予专利权的发明专利申请案卷,可以查阅和复制的案卷内容包括?
各级领导干部一定要勤政爱民,扎实工作,为人民群众________实实在在的利益。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是:
2017年5月,第一届“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛在()举行。
Whatmaybetheproblem?
(1)OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.IwashavingbreakfastatahotelverynearLiverpoolStreetStationwhenthefirste
最新回复
(
0
)