首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest? [A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will emb
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest? [A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will emb
admin
2018-10-16
90
问题
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest?
[A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will embrace the new and uncompromisingly follow the logic of prices and profit, a revolutionary accelerator for necessary change. But it can only ever react to today’s prices, which cannot capture what will happen tomorrow. So, left to itself, capitalism will neglect both the future and the cohesion of the society in which it trades.
[B]What we know, especially after the financial crisis of 2008, is that we can’t leave capitalism to itself. If we want it to work at its best, combining its doctrines with public and social objectives, there is no alternative but to design the markets in which it operates. We also need to try to add in wider obligations than the simple pursuit of economic logic. Otherwise, there lies disaster.
[C]If this is now obvious in banking, it has just become so in energy. Since 2004, consumers’ energy bills have nearly tripled, far more than the rise in energy prices. The energy companies demand returns nearly double those in mass retailing. This would be problematic at any time, but when wages in real terms have fallen by some 10% in five years it constitutes a crisis. John Major, pointing to the mass of citizens who now face a choice between eating or being warm—as he made the case for a high profits tax on energy companies—drove home the social reality. The energy market, as it currently operates, is maladaptive and illegitimate. There has to be changed.
[D]The design of this market is now universally recognised as wrong, universally, that is, excepting the regulator and the government. The energy companies are able to disguise their cost structures because there is no general pool into which they are required to sell their energy—instead opaquely striking complex internal deals between their generating and supply arms. Yet this is an industry where production and consumption is 24/7 and whose production logic requires such energy pooling. The sector has informally agreed, without regulatory challenge, that it should seek a supply margin of 5%—twice that of retailing.
[E]On top the industry also requires long-term price guarantees for investment in renewables and nuclear without any comparable return in lowering its target cost of capital. The national grid, similarly privately owned, balances its profit maximising aims with a need to ensure security of supply. And every commitment to decarbonise British energy supply by 2030 is passed on to the consumer, rich and poor alike, whatever their capacity to pay. It will also lead to negligible new investment unless backed by government guarantees and subsidies. It could scarcely be worse—and with so much energy capacity closing in the next two years constitutes a first-order national crisis.
[F]The general direction of reform is clear. Energy companies should be required to sell their electricity into a pool whose price would become the base price for retail. This would remove the ability to mask the relationship between costs and prices: retail prices would fall as well as rise clearly and unambiguously as pool prices changed.
[G]The grid, which delivers electricity and gas into our homes and is the guarantor that the lights won’t go out, must be in public ownership, as is Network Rail in the rail industry. It should also be connected to a pan-European grid for additional security. Green commitments, or decisions to support developing renewables, should be paid out of general taxation to take the poll tax element out of energy bills, with the rich paying more than the poor for the public good. Because returns on investment take decades in the energy industry, despite what free market fundamentalists argue, the state has to assume financial responsibility of energy investment as it is doing with nuclear and renewables.
[H]The British energy industry has gone from nationalisation to privatisation and back to government control in the space of 25 years. Although the energy industry is nominally in private hands, we have exactly the same approach of government picking winners and dictating investment plans that was followed with disastrous consequences from the Second World War to the mid 1980s. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the consumer got unfair treatment because long-term investment plans and contracts promoted by the government required electricity companies to use expensive local coal.
[I]The energy industry is, once again, controlled by the state. The same underlying drivers dictate policy in the new world of state control. It is not rational economic thinking and public-interested civil servants that determine policy, but interest groups. Going back 30 years, it was the coal industry—both management and unions—and the nuclear industry that dictated policy. Tony Benn said he had "never known such a well-organised scientific, industrial and technical lobby". Today, it is green pressure groups, EU parliamentarians and commissioners and, often, the energy industry itself that are loading burdens on to consumers. When the state controls the energy industry, whether through the back or the front door, it is vested interests(既得利益)that get their way and the consumer who pays.
[J]So how did we get to where we are today? In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the industry was entirely privatised. It was recognised that there were natural monopoly elements and so prices in these areas were regulated. At the same time, the regulator was given a duty to promote competition. From 1998, all domestic energy consumers could switch supplier for the first time and then wholesale markets were liberalised, allowing energy companies to source the cheapest forms of energy. Arguably, this was the high water mark of the liberalisation of the industry.
[K]Privatisation was a great success. Instead of investment policy being dictated by the impulses of government and interest groups, it became dictated by long-term commercial considerations. Sadly, the era of liberalised markets, rising efficiency and lower bills did not last long. Both the recent Labour governments and the coalition have pursued similar policies of intervention after intervention to send the energy industry almost back to where it started.
[L]One issue that unites left and many on the paternalist right is that of energy security. We certainly need government intervention to keep the lights on and ensure that we are not over-dependent on energy from unstable countries. But it should also be noted that there is nothing more insecure than energy arising from a policy determined by vested interests without any concern for commercial considerations. Energy security will not be achieved by requiring energy companies to invest in expensive sources of supply and by making past investments redundant through regulation. It will also not be achieved by making the investment environment even more uncertain. Several companies all seeking the cheapest supplies from diverse sources will best serve the interests of energy security.
[M]The UK once had an inefficient and expensive energy industry. After privatisation, costs fell as the industry served the consumer rather than the mining unions and pro-nuclear interests. Today, after a decade or more of increasing state control, we have an industry that serves vested interests rather than the consumer interest once again. Electricity prices before taxes are now 15% higher than the average of major developed nations. Electricity could be around 50% cheaper without government interventions. We must liberalise again and not complete the circle by returning to nationalisation.
The production logic of energy industry calls for an energy pooling which currently does not exist.
选项
答案
D
解析
根据关键词production logic和energy pooling锁定D段。D段第2句讲到能源公司之所以能够隐瞒其成本结构是因为目前没有一个总的能源汇集库(no general pool)来要求能源公司把能源卖到这里,而倒数第2句说能源行业的生产逻辑又需要(requires)这种能源联营。本题句子信息结合了这两句的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rfH7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Lastyearatairportsacrosstheworld,18%offlightsweredelayed,leavingmillionsofpassengersstuckwithalotoftimeon
Lastyearatairportsacrosstheworld,18%offlightsweredelayed,leavingmillionsofpassengersstuckwithalotoftimeon
NewDiscoveriesofPublicTransportA)AnewstudyconductedfortheWorldBankbyMurdochUniversity’sInstituteforScienceand
A)TheSupremeCourtunambiguouslyruledWednesdaythatprivacyrightsarenotsacrificedto21stcenturytechnology,sayingunan
A、Toprovidesoftware.B、Todotroubleshooting.C、Tosellproducts.D、Todosystemanalysis.C细节题。文中应聘者陈述自己的工作职责分别是systemanaly
Nearlytwo-thirdsofbusinessesintheUKwantto【C1】______staffwithforeignlanguageskills.Frenchisstillthemosthighlyp
A、Sometimeshehastoworkoutdoorsinbadweather.B、Itistoohard.C、Hecannotgetagoodpay.D、Itisextremelyboring.A细节题
长江(theYangtzeRiver)是世界第三长河,中国第一长河,全长6380公里。它发源于青海省,一路无数河流汇入,向东注入东海(theEastChinaSea)。作为中国古文化的发祥地,长江在历史、文化和经济上都对中国的发展有着极其重要的作
IsPaidFamilyLeaveBadforBusiness?A)Paidfamilyleave,whichtopstheagendaofMonday’sWhiteHouseSummitonWorking
A、Todosomeclericalwork.B、Toownherownlawoffice.C、Tobecomeawell-knownlawyer.D、Topracticelawinwell-knownlawof
随机试题
医疗机构违反规定,涂改、伪造、隐匿、销毁病历资料的,对直接责任人员应( )医疗机构违反规定,涂改、伪造、隐匿、销毁病历资料、情节严重的,对直接责任人员应( )
定传动比圆柱形平摩擦轮传动中,其小轮是用()制造的。
Igotcaughtintherainandmysuit______.
某上市公司拟投资新建一个生产项目,委托甲咨询公司开展可行性研究,通过比较A、B两个厂址方案的建设条件、建设投资和运营费用,甲咨询公司推荐了B方案。B方案总建设占用用地面积为100000m2,总建筑面积为150000m2,建(构)筑物及堆场总占地面积为300
对某商场地下车库的机械排烟系统进行验收时,选择一个防火分区的一只感温探测器和一只手动报警装置进行模拟火灾试验,然后观察排烟阀和排烟风机的动作情况,并使用风速仪测试相应排烟口处的风速。下列现场情况及排烟口处的风速测试结果中,符合验收要求的是()。
“备案号”栏应填()。“成交方式”栏应填()。
一般情况下。优先股的股息率是()的,其持有者的股东权利受到一定限制。
下列脑颅骨中,成对的是()。
以下ARM指令中源操作数属于寄存器间接寻址的指令是()。
TheHydrogenEconomyItseemsthateverydaythereisanewannouncementinthenewsaboutautomobilespoweredbyfuelcells
最新回复
(
0
)