首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-06-11
48
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence " suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is______
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer.
B、electricity really affects cancer.
C、controversial.
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer.
答案
A
解析
由文章第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是据科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病,淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,因此电和致癌有一定难以确定的关系。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ryFO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Atthemeeting,Smithargued_____infavoroftheproposal.
Howmanythingscanyouseeinthenightsky?Alot!OnaclearnightyoumightseetheMoon,someplanets,andthousandsofspar
Anotherbigissue_____thenationistheproblemoftheeducationofitscitizens.
TheBushcrowdbristlesattheuseofthe"Q-word"—quagmire(沼泽)—todescribeAmericaninvolvementinIraq.Butwithoursoldiers
He’swatchingTV?He’s_____tobecleaninghisroom.
Insuchachanging,complexsocietyformerlysimplesolutionstoinformationalneedsbecomecomplicated.Manyoflife’sproblems
Everyoneitseemshasahealthproblem.AfterpouringbillionsintotheNationalHealthService,Britishpeoplemoanaboutdirty
Oneofthebasiccharacteristicsofcapitalismistheprivateownershipofthemajormeansofproduction—capital.Theownershi
Weshould______withthedoctor’srequest.
It’snevereasyforamightymilitarytotreadlightlyonforeignsoil.InthecaseofAmericanforcesinSouthKorea,protector
随机试题
区域性心肌梗死的病变特点是
房地产项目产品定位的市场分析方法,其工作流程一般为()等。
下列各项中,应该按照有关规定缴纳行李和邮递物品进口税的有()。
英国的社会保障体系划分为:社会救助、失业津贴和救济、免费教育、社会福利和个人生活的社会照顾等。()
多血质的神经过程的特征是()。
《学会生存》一书指出:“可能平等地受教育,这只是平等的必要条件,而不是它的充分条件,……,平等的机会必须包括同样成功的机会”,而“机会平等是要肯定每一个人都能受到适当的教育,而且这种教育的进度和方法是适合个人特点的”。这主要阐述了()。
下列属于初中教育对个体发展的功能的有()。
我国刑法中的犯罪概念是形式与实质相结合的犯罪概念。
若有定义语句"doublea=2/3.0;",则语句"cout
Whatisthemaintopicofthistalk?
最新回复
(
0
)