首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-06-11
39
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence " suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is______
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer.
B、electricity really affects cancer.
C、controversial.
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer.
答案
A
解析
由文章第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是据科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病,淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,因此电和致癌有一定难以确定的关系。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ryFO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Duringthepasttenorfifteenyears,agreatdealofattentionhasbeen【C1】______to"tellingitlikeitis,"or"lettingitallh
TheremnantsofRomanEmpirecanbefoundinmanycountriesinAsia,Europe,andAfrica.
Oneofthemajordifferencesbetweenmanandhisclosestlivingrelativeis,ofcourse,thatthechimpanzeehasnotdevelopedthe
Thepolicehaveofferedalarge_____forinformationleadingtotherobber’sarrest.
Immigrationposestwomainchallengesfortherichworld’sgovernments.Oneishowtomanagetheinflow(流入)ofmigrants;theothe
EvenbyDavidCameron’sstandards,itwasaswiftU-turn.Firstthingyesterday,DowningStreetwasstillrefusingtopublisha
EvenbyDavidCameron’sstandards,itwasaswiftU-turn.Firstthingyesterday,DowningStreetwasstillrefusingtopublisha
Weshould______withthedoctor’srequest.
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout,welookedforoperations.Weknowthatcorrelation
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout,welookedforoperations.Weknowthatcorrelation
随机试题
将货物按订单要求从流通据点运送到收货人的物流活动称为()。
患者女,63岁。右下腹及脐周隐痛3年,渐渐清瘦,近2个月来常有低热,体格检查发现右下腹可触及一6cm×4cm大小的包块,较硬,尚可推动,压痛,锁骨上及腹股沟区未触及肿大淋巴结,结合其他检查结果,该患者被确诊为右侧结肠癌。行根治性手术治疗,手术范围包括
乳化脂肪混悬液的成分是
如图所示,折射率为n2、厚度为e的透明介质薄膜的上方和下方的透明介质的折射率分别为n1和n3,已知n1<n2<n3。若用波长为λ的单色平行光垂直入射到该薄膜上,则从薄膜上、下两表面反射的光束(1)和(2)的光程差是:
根据《建设工程监理规范》,总监理工程师不得委托给总监理工程师代表的职责是()。
房屋租赁合同中,引起租赁纠纷的主要原因是()
设向量组α1=(1,0,1)T,α2=(0,1,1)T,α3=(1,3,5)T不能由向量组β1=(1,1,1)T,β2=(1,2,3)T,β3=(3,4,a)T线性表示。将β1,β2,β3由α1,α2,α3线性表示。
[A]supermarket[Blackboard[C]knife[D]medicine[E]library[F]airport[G]gardenPlanestakeoffandlandthere.
Virtuallyeverythingastronomersknownaboutobjectsoutsidethesolarsystemisbasedonthedetectionofphotons—quantaofele
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweareinourteensorearlytwentiesthanatanyotherti
最新回复
(
0
)