首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
63
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Utilitarianism as Moral Philosophy.
B、Utilitarians Are Not Nice People.
C、Utilitarian A Good Man?
D、Utilitarianism and Morality.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
随机试题
A.无需审查B.经国家食品药品监督管理局审查C.经省级药品监督管理部门审查D.经省级工商行政管理部门审查E.经国家工商管理总局审查根据《药品广告审查办法》发布在指定的医学杂志上仅宣传药品名称的处方药广告,可以
预期违约和不安抗辩权在性质、效果方面的主要区别。(中国政法大学2005年研究生入学考试题)
下列符合《货物运输业小规模纳税人申请代开增值税专用发票管理办法》规定的有()。
2015年12月31日DA公司账上有三笔长期借款:(1)2012年9月15日借入4年期借款100万元;(2)2014年5月1日借入3年期借款200万元;(3)2015年12月1日借入5年期借款150万元。则DA公司2015年12月31日资产负债表中列示于“
在以价格为纵:坐标,收入为横坐标的坐标系中()。
Overanextendedperiodoftimeitispossibleforpotentialfirmstoenterorforexistingfirmstoleaveacompetitiveindustr
某债券面值为1000元,票面利率为10%,期限5年,每半年付息一次,若市场利率为15%,则其发行时价格()。
下列叙述中,正确的是()。
能正确表述“x为大于等于5并且小于20的数”的VisualBasic表达式是
李香在河南某公司财务部工作,根据工作安排,她近期将要向其主管汇报2013年度公司差旅报销情况。请你按照如下要求帮她完成2013年度公司差旅报销情况的统计分析工作:在考生文件夹下,将“Excel素材文件.xlsx”另存为“Excel.xlsx”(“.xl
最新回复
(
0
)