首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
33
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Utilitarianism as Moral Philosophy.
B、Utilitarians Are Not Nice People.
C、Utilitarian A Good Man?
D、Utilitarianism and Morality.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
随机试题
患者,女,40岁。外伤致左肩疼痛,活动受限。查体:左侧肩胛盂处有空虚感,杜加(Dugas)征阳性,诊断为肩关节脱位。对该患者首选的治疗方法是
A.三带喙库蚊B.中华按蚊C.格氏血历螨D.微小按蚊E.白纹伊蚊我国北纬25°以南山地和丘陵地区疟疾的主要传播媒介是
路基换填主要是针对()的情况而采用的一种常用的地基处理方式。
关于自理报检单位的权利,以下表述错误的是()。
若6月S&P500期货买权履约价格为1100,权利金为50,6月期货市价为1105,则()。
下列属于投资政策说明书内容的是()。Ⅰ.投资范围和投资限制Ⅱ.投资回报率目标Ⅲ.业绩比较基准Ⅳ.风险提示
【2015年湖南长沙.单选】科学知识在未用于生产之前,只是一种意识形态的生产力,要把意识形态的生产力转为人能掌握并用于生产的现实生产力,必须依靠()。
服装业是劳动密集型产业,生产服装需要雇用一大批人。汽车业是资金密集型产业,大量资本投入到由相对少的人操纵的复杂设备上,如果不考虑附加收入,一个普通的美国服装工人在1979年的工资是一个普通的汽车工人的46%。下面哪一项,如果是正确的,可能是造成汽车
在考生文件夹中新建一个SOUND.TXT文件。
WhatdoesLindathinkaboutthebooksonMatthew’sreadinglist?ChooseFOURanswersfromtheboxandwritethecorrectletter,
最新回复
(
0
)