首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
admin
2018-06-29
54
问题
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: " Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
(2) The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved; in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted" , in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S. —meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Orr for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"-—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French (or Turkish) every year.
(3) Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. " You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. "You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs. "
(4) This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether " generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
(5) So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man (I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
(6) But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that " generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust; tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
(7) But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital" — networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild" social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital—old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
(8) Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
In the last paragraph, the author seems to suggest all of the following EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、British government should set a good example for citizens
B、British government should bear responsibility for lowered trustfulness
C、British people should learn to trust their government more
D、British people aren’t distrustful of each other
答案
C
解析
推断题。末段指出,哈尔朋先生书中的结论会比我的更有见地;但通过上述调研和自己的观察,我本能地得出两个结论:第一,我们并没有像自己所称的那么愤世嫉俗,更不像媒体那样冷嘲热讽;第二,最大的信任危机并不在民众之间,而存在于民众与政府以及各种公共机构之间。补救办法则掌握在各位政客手中,他们应该控制一下自己以及企业界朋友的野心与贪欲。自上而下的干预令人生厌,不过自上而下的表率会更有效。由此可知,[A]、[B]和[D]都是作者的观点,故排除。这里并没有号召人们学习信任政府,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sEEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
PassageTwo
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofCambridgeUniversity,andtheresearchersattheDowni
Inlastweek’sTribune,therewasaninterestingletterfromMr.J.StewartCook,inwhichhesuggestedthatthebestwayofavo
PassageThreeWhat’stheresultofDukeUniversity’sresearch?
Forcenturies,immigrantshavecometoAmericaseekingthepromiseoflife,liberty,andthepursuitofhappiness.Somecamefl
Besidesconcernsabouthowadsaffectindividuals,criticshaveraisedethicalissuesabouthowadvertisingaffectssociety.F
Amajoraspectofmanyfirms’marketingstrategiesoverthepastdecadehavebeenthedevelopmentofnewproducts.【M1】______Co
Formany,thepursuitofhappinessisalsothepursuitofprosperity.PartoftheAmericandreamistheabilitytoprovide【M1】__
Formany,thepursuitofhappinessisalsothepursuitofprosperity.PartoftheAmericandreamistheabilitytoprovide【M1】__
TwoCulturalDimensionsCultureisthecollectiveprogrammingofthemindwhichdistinguishesthemembersofonecategoryofpeo
随机试题
由盛唐过渡到中唐的一位集大成的诗人是()。
咳嗽伴胸痛不常见于
求取建筑物折旧应注意的事项包括:()。
甲公司2009年8月1日资产总额为500万元,8月份发生下列经济业务:(1)向某公司购入材料200000元已验收入库,货款未付。(2)办公事主任张明因出差预借现金4000元。(3)以银行存款归还银行借款500000元。(4)生产乍问领用材料1000
张先生夫妇今年均已40岁,家里存款在50万元左右。他和妻子两个人每月收入大约1万元,月花费近4000元。张先生和妻子计划在10年后退休,假设他们退休后再生存30年,且他们每年花费16万元(注:这笔钱在每年年初拿出),减掉基本养老保险和保险公司给予的保险金3
网页广告设计流程的注意事项包括______、______、______、______。
物业服务企业对写字楼物业的管理、经营与服务是相辅相成的,()是其基本职责,()是其生存发展的基础,()是确保经营和服务正常运行的枢纽。三位—体,三者并重,缺一不可。
A、 B、 C、 D、 C
A、Yes,Ido.B、Sorry,Idon’tknow.C、Isthatright?A听力原文:Doyoulikeswimming?意为:你喜欢游泳吗?是—…般疑问句,应该用Yes或No来回答。所以应选A。
Thehumanbraincontains10thousandmillioncellsandeachofthesemayhaveathousandconnections.Suchenormousnumbersused
最新回复
(
0
)