首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Environmental Science What happened during the agricultural expansion in the southern Great Plains?
Environmental Science What happened during the agricultural expansion in the southern Great Plains?
admin
2014-09-29
85
问题
Environmental Science
What happened during the agricultural expansion in the southern Great Plains?
Environmental Science
Narrator
Listen to part of a lecture in an environmental science class.
Professor
OK, now let’s talk about another environmental concern—soil erosion. It’s a major problem, all around the world. Sometimes erosion damages soil so severely that the land can no longer be cultivated and it’s just abandoned. That happened in a big way right here in the United States. Some of you have probably read the novel The Grapes of Wrath. And maybe you remember that the story took place in the 1930s, during the time of what was called the Dust Bowl.
Dust Bowl is a term we use to describe an ecological and human disaster that took place in the southern Great Plains region. For nearly eight years, dust and sand blew across the area and covered everything. It was so bad it even made breathing and eating difficult. . . and farmers could only look on helplessly as their crops were destroyed and the land .. . and their lives ... ruined.
Now, there’d always been droughts and strong winds in that region. But that was OK because the native grasses had deep roots in the ground that were able to hold the soil in place. So the wind wasn’t able to, you know, erode the soil too badly. This changed, though, between 1900 and 1930. Agriculture was expanding rapidly then, and lots of farmers in the southern Great Plains wanted to grow wheat and other crops they could sell for cash—uh, crops that would be profitable. So they ripped up much of the grassland to plant these crops like wheat, which don’t hold the soil down nearly as well. At the same time, livestock—uh, cattle, too many of them—were feeding on grasses in the area and damaging a lot of the grassland. So these animals caused even more erosion of the soil.
It didn’t help that many of the actual owners of the land were not living anywhere near the area—a lot of the landowners lived way back east, and rented out the land to local people who lived on the land and worked on it, but, um, didn’t have much reason to take really good care of it. I mean, it wasn’t their land, right? The tenant farmers weren’t really interested in conserving someone else’s soil—not for the long term, anyway.
Also, some thought the land couldn’t really be damaged—you know, that the soil was so rich and deep that... it didn’t matter if the topsoil, the soil on the surface, blew away. They thought they could just plow up more. But they were wrong. Good top-soil takes a long time to form—it can literally take thousands of years to create good topsoil that will grow vegetation—and a very short time to ruin it. So after only a few years of excessive plowing, the land pretty much couldn’t be farmed anymore. And people moved on to other places and let the old areas just sit there. And when they didn’t plant anything on that land, that made it vulnerable to even more erosion. So it was kind of a vicious cycle, you could say.
Another problem, ironically, was that advances in technology were actually destroying the land, instead of improving it. A lot of farmers were using huge new tractors that dug deep into the ground and tore up a lot of the soil.
And then, of course, there was the weather. You know, when people look back on the Dust Bowl era, they tend to blame the drought—the lack of rain between 1934 and 1937. We can’t ignore the drought—I mean, it was the worst on record at the time and did help bring on this disaster. But—without the soil destruction—the drought alone wouldn’t have resulted in the devastation we call the Dust Bowl. It was poor farming techniques that made that happen.
Since then, though, we’ve paid more attention to trying to prevent a future Dust Bowl. One thing Congress did was enact a massive government effort to improve soil conservation, called the Soil Erosion Act. Under this law, large stretches of land in the southern Great Plains were identified as being at risk for erosion and were taken out of production and turned into permanent grassland. What that did—by protecting the land from excessive farming—was to stabilize the soil. Also, the Soil Erosion Act helped educate farmers to practice better soil conservation techniques, like reducing how often they plowed and using better equipment that would, you know, minimize damage to the soil structure.
选项
A、People improved the soil by planting wheat.
B、Raising cattle and other livestock became less common.
C、Most of the landowners became farmers.
D、Much of the grassland was destroyed.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sHfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSAND/ORANUMBERforeachanswer.GOODBYEPARTYFORJOH
Labelthemapbelow.Writethecorrectletter,A-l,nexttoquestions17-20.HinchingbrookeParkbirdhide
Completetheformbelow.WriteONEWORDAND/ORANUMBERforeachanswer.
Choosethecorrectanswer,A,BorC.ProjectonworkplacementHowmanyacademicorganisationsreturnedDave’squestionnaire?
WhatdoSharonandXiaoLiagreewasthestrongestaspectoftheirpresentation?
Completethenotesbelow.WriteONEWORDAND/ORANUMBERforeachanswer.ThingstodobeforewegoExam
WhatrulesapplytotakingdifferentobjectstotheCentre?Matcheachobjectwiththecorrectrule,A-C.Writethecorrectlett
Whatisthetutor’sopinionofthefollowingcompanyprojects?ChooseFIVEanswersfromthebox,andwritethecorrectletter,A
Whatproblemsdothespeakersidentifyforthisproject?ChooseSEVENanswersfromtheboxandwritetheletters,A-H,nexttoq
AUSTRALIAGeographyThedriestcontinentis【L31】________Australiaisabout【L32】________timeslargerthanBritain.Threemains
随机试题
A.左旋甲状腺素B.丙硫氧嘧啶C.小剂量碘D.大剂量碘E.131I呆小症应选用
中风阳闭和阴闭的区别在于有无()
患儿,12岁,身高165cm,体重98kg,属肥胖症。医生建议控制饮食减轻体重。护士为患者制订的饮食应该是
矿山工程项目进度控制由于影响因素多,控制技术复杂,因此必须认真进行分析研究和规划,具体表现在()。
根据我国现行规定,征用耕地的补偿费应为该耕地被征前三年平均年产值的()倍。
国内外主流基金业绩评价体系的特点有()。Ⅰ.基金分类Ⅱ.方法模型Ⅲ.充分考虑公募基金相对收益的特征Ⅳ.充分考虑信息有效性因素
根据仲裁的特点,仲裁必须遵循的原则包括()。
甲、乙二人各以40%与60%的份额共有一间房屋,出租给丙。现甲欲将自己的份额转让,请问下列表述中哪一说法是正确的?
最新研究成果认为,导致心脑血管疾病的一大因素就是高血脂,饮食的油腻程度与血脂确实有着解不开的联系,但不是必然的。血脂在人体内有一个新陈代谢的过程,各种营养素在体内是可以互相转化的。一个人如果体内合成血脂能力强的话,就算只吃素也会有高血脂,素食只对高血脂症患
Ithasbeenageneralphenomenonthatpeoplesacrificeenvironmentfortheirselfishinterest.Lookatthefollowingpicturecar
最新回复
(
0
)