首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You will be given a brief quotation that states or implies an issue of general interest and specific instructions on how to resp
You will be given a brief quotation that states or implies an issue of general interest and specific instructions on how to resp
admin
2014-09-18
82
问题
You will be given a brief quotation that states or implies an issue of general interest and specific instructions on how to respond to that issue. You will then have 30 minutes to plan and compose a response according to the specific instructions. A response to any other issue will receive a score of zero.
Make sure that you respond according to the specific instructions and support your position on the issue with reasons and examples drawn from such areas as your reading, experience, observations, and/or academic studies.
Trained GRE readers will evaluate your response for its overall quality, based on how well you:
Respond to the specific task instructions
Consider the complexities of the issue
Organize, develop, and express your ideas
Support your ideas with relevant reasons and/or examples
Control the elements of standard written English
Before you begin writing, you may want to think for a few minutes about the issue and the specific task instructions and then plan your response. Be sure to develop your position fully and organize it coherently, but leave time to reread what you have written and make any revisions you think are necessary.
Issue Topic
The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
选项
答案
The recommendation presents a view that I would agree is successful most of the time, but one that I cannot fully support due to the "all or nothing" impression it gives. Certainly as an educator I agree fully that the best way to elicit positive response from students is to make use of students’ positive energy and then encourage actions that you would like to see repeated. It is human nature that we all want to be accepted and achieve on some level, and when people in authority provide feedback that we have done something well, the drive to repeat the action that was praised is bound to be particularly strong. This blanket statement would obviously pay dividends in situations in which a teacher desires to have students repeat particular behaviors. For example, if an educator is attempting to teach students proper classroom etiquette, it would be appropriate to openly praise a student who raises his or her hand when wishing to speak or address the class. In such cases, the teacher may also help shape positive behaviors by ignoring a student who is trying to interject without approval from the teacher. In fact, the decision to ignore students who are exhibiting inappropriate behaviors of this type could work very well in this situation, as the stakes are not very high and the intended outcome can likely be achieved by such a method. However, it is important to note here that this tactic would only be effective in such a "low-stakes" situation, as when a student speaks without raising her hand first. As we will discuss below, ignoring a student who hits another student, or engages in more serious misbehaviors, would not be effective or prudent. To expand on this point, it is important for teachers to be careful when working with the second half of this statement, only ignoring negative actions that are not serious. Take for instance a student who is misbehaving just by chatting with a fellow classmate. This student might not be presenting much of a problem and may be simply seeking attention. Ignoring the student might, in fact, be the best solution. Now assume the negative action is the improper administering of chemicals in a science experiment or the bullying of a fellow student. To ignore these negative actions would be absurd and negligent. Now you are allowing a problem to persist, one that could potentially lead to much bigger and more dangerous issues. In a more serious situation, addressing the negative actions quickly and properly could stop the problem it in its tracks. It is for reasons like this that I do not advocate the idea that a teacher can be successful by simply ignoring negative actions. I do, however, greatly support the idea that the central focus of teaching should be to build on and encourage positive actions. However, the author’s all-encompasing statement leaves too many negative possibilities for the classroom. Perhaps a better way to phrase this statement would be to say, "The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones that are not debilitating to class efficiency or the safety of any individual". Thus, in the original statement, there are indeed some good intentions, and there could be a lot of merit in adopting its basic principles. Data proves that positive support can substantially increase motivation and desire in students and contribute to positive achievements. In fact, most studies of teaching efficacy indicate that praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones can create a more stable and efficient classroom. It needs to be stressed, however, that this tool is only effective at certain levels of misbehavior. As mentioned above, when the behavior is precipitated by feelings of revenge, power or total self-worthlessness, this methodology will likely not work. It is likely to be very successful, however, when the drive behind the misbehavior is simple attention seeking. In many of these instances, if the teacher demonstrates clearly that inappropriate behavior does not result in the gaining of attention, students are more likely to seek attention by behaving properly. Should the student choose this path, then the ignoring has worked and when the positive behavior is exhibited, then the teacher can utilize the first part of the theory and support or praise this behavior. Now it is much more likely to be repeated. If the student does not choose this path and instead elects to raise the actions to a higher level that presents a more serious issue, then ignorance alone cannot work and other methods must be employed. In conclusion, one can appreciate the credo expressed in this instance, but surely we all can see the potential error of following it through to the extreme.
解析
This response receives a 6 for its well-articulated, insightful analysis of the issue. Rather than simply rejecting or accepting the prompt, the writer argues that the recommendation made by the prompt can often be true but is too "all or nothing" to be endorsed without qualification. The writer turns this idea into an insightful position by providing examples and evidence to fully and persuasively support its nuanced argument. The response offers nicely detailed situations that provide compelling support for a claim that the recommendation can, in fact, work. At the same time, it also highlights the recommendations limits using additional specific, detailed examples. Particularly persuasive is the fourth paragraph, in which the writer compares the impact of ignoring minor behavioral problems like talking in class to the potential costs of ignoring more serious issues like bullying. Thus, the writer recognizes that the prompt’s claim, as well as his/her own, is inevitably dependent on the specific context for its success or failure. Throughout the response, the writer demonstrates the ability to convey ideas fluently and precisely using effective vocabulary and sentence variety. This sentence demonstrates the level of language facility seen throughout the response: "It is human nature that we all want to be accepted and achieve on some level, and when people in authority provide feedback that we have done something well, the drive to repeat the action that was praised is bound to be particularly strong."
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sHkO777K
本试题收录于:
GRE ANALYTICAL WRITING题库GRE分类
0
GRE ANALYTICAL WRITING
GRE
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedStates【C1】______alargepartoftheNorthAmericancontinent.ItsneighborsareCanada【C2】______thenorth,andMexico
Whatdowemeanbyasatisfactorystandardofliving?Obviously,itmustincludethebasicnecessitiesoflifesuchasfood,clo
Halfoftheworld’scoralreefs(珊瑚礁)havediedinthelast30years.Nowscientistsareracingtoensurethattherestsurvive
Peoplesaythatmoneycannotbuyhappiness.ThiswastrueforHowardHughes.Hewasoneoftherichestandmostpowerfulmenof
Forthepastseveralyears,theSundaynewspapersupplementParadehasfeaturedacolumncalled"AskMarilyn."Peopleareinvite
Itisdifficulttoimaginewhatlifewouldbelikewithoutmemory.Themeaningsofthousandsofeverydayperceptions,thebases
Scientistsmeasuredtheimpactthatpeoplehaveontheenvironmentusingatermcalledcarbon"footprint."Thatfootprintrefle
Scientistsmeasuredtheimpactthatpeoplehaveontheenvironmentusingatermcalledcarbon"footprint."Thatfootprintrefle
Inmakingmarketinvestigation,oneshould______.Theword"indispensable"inthefirstlinemeans______.
Itwasinthatsmallroom______theyworkedhardanddreamedofbetterdaystocome.
随机试题
对散见于不同规范性文件中属于某一部门的全部现行法律规范进行审查、修改和补充,编制成统一的部门法典的活动,称为
一患者在得知自己身患绝症后不愿再进行输液治疗,经常到主任、护士长处投诉医生、护士对自己冷淡,并打骂家人,摔毁自己的用物。此时患者处于
以CO2为超临界流体提取挥发油的优点除外
同卵孪生兄弟之间的器官移植,能永久存活而不产生排斥反应,称为()。
甲公司为上市公司。系增值税—般纳税人,增值税税率为17%。为提高市场占有率及实现多元化经营,甲公司在2010年和2012年进行了—系列投资和资本运作。(1)甲公司于2010年5月20日与乙公司的控股股东3A公司签订股权转让协议,以乙公司2010年7月1日
在一个环境气候多变的生态系统中,生存机会最多的种群是()。
从世界经济的发展历程来看,如果一国或地区的经济保持着稳定的增长速度,大多数商品和服务的价格必然随之上涨,只要这种涨幅始终在一个较小的区间内就不会对经济造成负面影响。由此可以推出,在一定时期内()。
在西方近代教育史上,第一次明确提出德、智、体几个方面协调发展,并坚持教育与生产劳动相结合的是()。
(2006下网工)在WebServices中,客户与服务之间的标准通信协议是______。
Britishairisfarcleanerthanitwasafewdecadesago.Fewerpeopleusecoal-burningstoves:oldindustrialplantshavebeen
最新回复
(
0
)