首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Future of Television: What’s on Next? Bosses in the television industry have been keeping a nervous eye on two Scandinav
The Future of Television: What’s on Next? Bosses in the television industry have been keeping a nervous eye on two Scandinav
admin
2012-02-02
96
问题
The Future of Television: What’s on Next?
Bosses in the television industry have been keeping a nervous eye on two Scandinavians (斯堪的纳维亚人) with a reputation for causing trouble. In recent years Niklas Zennstrom, a Swede, and Janus Friis, a Dane, have frightened the music industry by inventing KaZaA, a "peer-to-peer" (P2P) file-sharing program that was widely used to download music without paying for it. Then they horrified the mighty telecoms industry by inventing Skype, another P2P program, which lets Internet users make free telephone calls between computers, and very cheap calls to ordinary phones. Their next move was to found yet another start-up — this time, one that threatened to devastate (毁坏) the television industry.
It may do the opposite, as it turns out. The new service, called Joost and now in advanced testing, is based on P2P software that runs on people’s computers, just like Skype and KaZaA. And it does indeed promise to transform the experience of watching television by combining what people like about old-fashioned TV with the exciting possibilities of the Internet. "But unlike KaZaA and Skype," says Fredrik de Wahl, a Swede whom Mr. Zennstrom and Friis have hired as Joost’s boss, "Joost does not disrupt the industry that it is entering. Instead, rather than undercutting television networks and producers, Joost might, as it were, give them new juice."
That is because Mr. de Wahl and his Joost team, working mostly in the Netherlands, have bravely ignored the totems (图腾) of the Internet-video boom. Chief among these fashions is letting users upload anything they want to a video service — which might include clips of themselves doing odd things ("user-generated content") or, more questionably, videos pirated from other sources. The celebrated example of this approach is YouTube, which is now part of Google, the leader in Internet search. Its big problem, however, is that it can be illegal (if copyright is violated) and terribly hard to turn into a business.
On February 2nd Viacom, an American media giant, became the latest company to demand that YouTube remove copyright-infringing (侵犯版权的) clips from its website. YouTube has struck deals with some media firms, including NBC and CBS, to allow their material to appear on its site, and had been trying to thrash out a similar agreement with Viacom. Many observers regard Viacom’s move as a negotiating tactic. But whether YouTube can make money is unclear. Last month Chad Hurley, YouTube’s chief executive, sketched out plans for generating advertising revenues and sharing them with content providers, but so far his firm has none to speak of.
The Innovation of Joost
Joost is also ignoring the two business models seen as the most respectable alternatives to advertising. One is to make users pay for each television show or film they download, but then to let them keep it. This is the tack chosen by Apple, an electronics firm that sells videos on iTunes, its popular online store; by Amazon, the largest online retailer; and by Wal-Mart, the largest traditional retailer, which launched a video-download service this week. The other approach is to let users subscribe to what is, in effect, an all-you-can-eat buffet of videos, and then to "stream" video to their computers without leaving a permanent copy. This is the approach taken by, for instance, Netflix, a Californian firm that mostly delivers DVDs to its subscribers by post, but now also streams films.
The reason that Joost is ignoring all of these methods, says Mr. de Wahl, is that none has much to do with the experience of simply watching TV, which most people enjoy. "Unlike the download or streaming approaches," he says, "TV is not about buying today what you want to watch tomorrow. It’s about turning it on and watching." And in contrast to the "lean-forward" context of "snacking" on a YouTube clip in one’s cubicle while the boss has stepped out, TV is a longer and more relaxed "lean-backward" experience.
Hence Joost’s most shocking innovation, which is not to change the practices that TV adopted decades ago. It will be free, with advertising breaks — no more than three minutes per hour — either before, during or after a show, depending on the market. "Americans," says Mr. de Wahl, "are more tolerant of interruptions."
Joost has "channels", like ordinary TV, but these are now playlists of videos that start whenever it is convenient to the viewer. Viewers can import their instant-messaging buddy lists and chat online with friends while watching the same program. For advertisers, such engagement is worth something, because the activity proves that somebody is watching, rather than being asleep or out of the room. Combined with other information, such as the computer’s IP address and hence its location, advertisers will be able to target their spots much more accurately — all "Desperate Housewives" fans in a particular neighborhood, for example — and thus ought to pay a premium.
The Combination of Television and the Internet
The thing that is missing in this new vision of television, however, is the set itself. Beaming video from a computer to a television is possible: Apple and other firms are starting to sell the necessary gadgets. But until it becomes much easier to connect televisions to the Internet, big media companies are likely to "wait and see" before committing to Joost, says Jeremy Allaire, the boss of Brightcove, a rival Internet-video firm based in Massachusetts. In the meantime, Mr. Allaire thinks, media firms are mainly interested in building their own brands, so Brightcove provides content owners with technology to show television on their own websites, syndicate their shows to other websites, track audiences and collect advertising revenue.
There is, in short, no consensus about the best way to combine television with the Internet. Instead, there are a variety of experiments, of which Joost is the latest example and YouTube the best-known. But with telephony, the Internet is unpicking (拆开) service delivery from network ownership. Joost, YouTube, iTunes and Netflix do not need their own networks to supply their video services: they can rely on fast Internet links provided by others.
According to iSuppli, a market-research firm, Internet downloads will claim more than one-third of the market for on-demand video by 2010. So just as Internet telephony has been bad for traditional phone companies, this "Internet bypass" could be bad for the "on demand" video services being offered by cable-TV and telecoms firms over their networks. But by bringing television to more screens, this could provide new models for program-makers to finance their productions and offer advertisers new ways to reach constraints. And so Joost and rival services could end up rejuvenating (使变得年轻) the 75-year-old medium.
The primary difference between the two business models Joost is ignoring lies in______.
选项
A、whether to carry on together with advertising
B、whether to deliver its goods by post to its consumers
C、whether to make users pay for what they download
D、whether to allow users to keep what they download
答案
D
解析
该段讲了广告之外的两种商业模式。第二句说,第一种模式是让用户为自己下载的每一个电视或电影节目付费,并允许他们保存这些节目。倒数第二句介绍了第二种:让用户成为付费会员,允许他们在线观看,但不会在用户的计算机中留下永久性的文件(也就是说不允许他们保存这些节目),故答案为[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sbE7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、45minutes.B、60minutes.C、90minutes.D、40minutes.B信息明示题。文章最后提到,游客将有一小时的时间参观城堡,也就是NijojoCastle,因此B正确。
Technically,anysubstanceotherthanfoodthataltersourbodilyormentalfunctioningisadrug.Manypeoplemistakenbelieve
A、SoccerisnotpopularinItaly.B、MostCanadianshatehockey.C、MostAmericanslikebaseball.D、Thosewhodon’tlikebaseball
A、SigourneyWeaver.B、BillMitchell.C、KevinKline.D、IvanReitman.C短文中明确提到KevinKlinegivesadoubleperformanceasDaveandt
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthatofBritain,isheavilydependentoncertainessent
Intheolddays,childrenwerefamiliarwithbirthanddeathaspartoflife.ThisisperhapsthefirstgenerationofAmericany
Itturnedoutthatgettingfiredfromthatcompany___________________________(对我来说是发生在我身上的最棒的事情).
Televisionhaschangedthelifestyleofpeopleineveryindustrialize【S1】______.countryintheworld.IntheUnitedStat
Everyotherweekitseemsanewstudycomesoutthataddstoouralready-formidablestoreofparentalworries.Butevenbythose
随机试题
螺旋面如何展开?
ThereisnothingnewaboutTVandfashionmagazinesgivinggirlsunhealthyideasabouthowthintheyneedtobeinordertobec
A.壁细胞B.主细胞C.黏液细胞D.G细胞E.肥大细胞胃蛋白酶产生于
某公司当初以100万元购入一块土地,目前市价为80万元,如欲在这块土地上兴建厂房,则()。
甲签发一张票据给乙,乙将票据背书转让给丙,丙受丁胁迫将票据背书转让给丁,丁又将该票据赠与不知情的戊。根据票据法律制度的规定,下列说法中不正确的有()。
甲开了一家汽车维修公司,在维修汽车时,甲夸大汽车损毁程度,向保险公司多报汽车修理费用,骗取保险公司12万余元,甲的罪名应该()。
下列行政公文格式正文中的结尾部分,写法不妥当的是()。
虽然知识产权本质上是程度不一的知识垄断.但是由知识产权引起的知识垄断情形中的“垄断”含义与传统的反垄断法中“垄断”的含义有很大区别。由知识产权引起的“知识垄断”,主要是指知识产权法授予的排他权:如果该种排他权导致了相应产品或服务的市场垄断,那么“知识垄断”
下列选项中,不是算法基本特征的是()。
Lackofculture,orratheranexcessofthewrongsortofculture,isoftenconsideredtobesynonymouswithdisadvantage.Mostc
最新回复
(
0
)