首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Main
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Main
admin
2013-12-14
29
问题
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Singapore Government.
That does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure as un-Asian. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will subvert relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. The law cannot legislate filial responsibility any more than it can legislate love. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Singapore needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to shore it up.
Like many other developed nations, Singapore faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60years of age. Demography is inexorable. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By the end of the century that figure will grow to 11%. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age per se. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family, lifts is not a revolutionary concept. Nor is it uniquely Asian. Care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Singapore is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:(a)get a job and work until they die;(b)apply for public assistance(you have to be destitute to apply); or(c)starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Asian nations from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Singapore is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea. It reinforces the traditional values and it doesn’t hurt a society now and then to remind itself of its core values.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice. Until now, if a person asked family elders, clergymen or the Ministry of Community Development to help get financial support from his children, the most they could do was to mediate. But mediators have no teeth, and a child could simply ignore their pleas.
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace. Few people would be so thick-skinned as to say, "Sue will be damned." The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened. It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the recalcitrant son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.
It would be nice to think Singapore doesn’t need this kind of law. But that belief ignores the clear demographic trends and the effect of affluence itself on traditional bends. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
At the end of the passage, the author seems to imply that success of the Bill depends upon______.
选项
A、strict enforcement
B、public support
C、government assurance
D、filial awareness
答案
D
解析
推理题。文章的最后一句说“Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves mostsuccessful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.”这句话表明该议案是否成功要看它能否激励人们维护传统道德观念,而不是首先考虑对簿公堂,故D项“孝顺意识”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sdU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
Imagineadiseasespreadingacrosstheglobe,killingmostlymiddle-agedpeopleorleavingthemchronicallydisabled.Thenoned
A、Thebuyingoflifeinsuranceisnotthebusinessofguessing.B、Theremustbeastandardamountoflifeinsuranceforpeople.
A、Shewouldgotothedrugstore.B、Shewouldgotoseethedoctor.C、Shewouldtakemedicineathome.D、Shewouldfindthemedi
Ihadneverbeeninthepublicwardofahospitalbefore,anditwasmyfirstexperienceofdoctorswhohandleyouwithoutspeak
Weareallmembersofaculture.Howweinterprettherealityaroundus,whatweconsidertobereasonablestatementsandbehavi
Long-sufferingcouplestakeheart.Thereisagoodreasonforthoseendlessargumentsinthefrontofthecar:menandwomenuse
Thepopularideathatclassicalmusiccanimproveyourmathsisfallingfromfavor.Newexperimentshavefailedtosupportthew
Thedoctorsuggeststhatagoodholidayinthecountryshould______him______nicelyafterhisoperation.
Thedoctorgavehimaninjectioninorderto______thepain.
Seanalivedintheinpatienthospiceunitformorethanamonth,farlongerthananyonewouldhavepredicted,sustainedonlyon
随机试题
Exerciseisgoodforyou,butmostpeoplereallyknowverylittleabouthowtoexerciseproperly.【C1】________whenyoutry,yo
某男,40岁。患者平素喜食肥甘厚味。现症见:形体肥胖,少气懒言,胃脘痞满,自觉咽喉部有痰而难咳出,舌淡红苔白腻。根据患者的症状,可诊断病因为()。
通过经验方法得到混凝土的室内初步配合比为水泥:砂:石=1:1.73:3.33,W/C=0.42。但是,该配合比还需进行一系列检验和修正,以确保室内配合比满足设计要求。针对这样的工作内容,请回答下列问题。(配合比结果四舍五入取整数,水灰比保留2位小数)当
工会经费是企业按职工工资总额的3%计提的工会经费。()
对于公共建筑而言,消防电梯与防烟楼梯间合用的前室的面积不应小于()m2。
“收货单位”栏应填()。
案例九:李均夫妇有一个女儿,今年8岁,为了让孩子在今后的成长过程中接受高质量的教育,李军夫妇打算为孩子建立教育储备金。李均一家的财务状况为:李均今年30岁,是某贸易公司的业务员,每月税前工资为12000元。妻子周燕今年28岁,就职于某事业单位,每月税前收
下列关于保密信息定义条款的说法,正确的是()。
在以下几种货币政策工具中,最重要的是()。[2008年5月三级真题]
OnMarch18,1965,Leonov,theRussianastronaut,walkedinouterspaceforthefirsttime.Severalmonthslater,asimilarfeat
最新回复
(
0
)