首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for students except it lasts for months. Great applicati
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for students except it lasts for months. Great applicati
admin
2010-07-19
98
问题
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for students except it lasts for months. Great applications tell us we’ve done our job well, by attracting top-caliber students. But it’s challenging to maintain the frenetic pace without forgetting these are all real people with real aspirations--people whose life stories we are here to unravel, if they will let us.
The essay is a key piece of learning those life stories. I live near Los Angeles, where every day screenplays are read without regard for human context. The writer’s life and dreams don’t matter--all that matters is the writing, the ideas, the end product. On the other hand, in reading essays, context does matter: who wrote this? We are driven to put the jigsaw puzzle together because we think we are building a community, not just choosing neat stories. When I pick up a file, I want to know whether the student has sib lings or not, who his parents are, where he went to high school. Then I want the essay to help the rest of the application make sense, to humanize all the numbers that flow past. I am looking for insight.
A brilliantly written essay may compel me to look beyond superficial shortcomings in an application. But if no recommendation or grade or test score hints at such writing talent, I may succumb to cynicism and assume the writer had help--maybe too much. In the worst cases, I may find that I have read it be fore--with name and place changed--on the Internet, in an essay-editing service or a "best essays" book.
The most appealing essays take the opportunity to show a voice not rendered homogeneous and pasteurized. But sometimes the essays tell us too much. Pomona offers this instruction with one essay option: "We realize that not everything done in life is about getting into college. Tell us about something you did that was just plain fun. "One student grimly reported that nothing was fun because in his family everything was about getting into college. Every activity, course choice and spare moment. It did spark our sympathy, but it almost led to a call to Child Protective Services as well.
Perfection isn’t required. We have seen phenomenal errors in essays that haven’t damaged a student at all. I recall a student who wrote of the July 1969 lunar landing of-I kid you not--Louis Armstrong. I read on, shaking my head. This student was great--a jazz trumpeter who longed to study astronomy. It was a classic slip and perhaps a hurried merging of two personal heroes. He was offered admission, graduated and went on for a PhD in astrophysics. He may not have been as memorable if he had named "Neil" instead of "Louis" in his essay’s opening line. Hey, we’re human, too.
An essay that is rough around the edges may still be compelling. Good ideas make an impression, even when expressed with bad punctuation and spelling errors. Energy and excitement can be communicated. I’m not suggesting the "I came, I saw, I conquered" approach to essay writing, nor the "I saved the world" angle taken by some students who write about community service projects. I’m talking about smaller moments that are well captured. Essays don’t require the life tragedy that so many seem to think is necessary. Not all admission offers come out of sympathy!
Admissions officers, even at the most selective institutions, really aren’t looking for perfection in 17 and 18-year-olds. We are looking for the human being behind the roster of activities and grades. We are looking for those who can let down their guard just a bit to allow others in We are looking for people whose egos won’t get in the way of learning, students whose investment in ideas and words tells us in the context of their records--that they are aware of a world beyond their own homes, schools, grades and scores. A picture, they say, is worth a thousand words. To us, an essay that reveals a student’s unaltered voice is worth much, much more.
The sentence "Hey, we’re human, too." in the fifth paragraph implies that ______.
选项
A、man should look before they leap.
B、man might shrink back from difficulties.
C、man should be severe with themselves.
D、it is hard for man to avoid mistakes.
答案
D
解析
语义理解题。首句点明:Perfection isn’t required.接下来给出例子:一个学生将1969年登月的宇航员名字记错了,但还是被录取了,后来读了博士学位。可见段末那句话的意思是说;人无完人,犯错很正常。故[D]为答案。[A]“三思而后行”;[B]“知难而退”和[C]“严于律己”与此处语境无关,排除.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sklO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B6】
Afghanpeoplearesufferingfromstarvationbecause
StudyActivitiesinUniversityInordertohelpcollegeanduniversitystudentsintheprocessoflearning,fourkeystudya
ThePresidentduringtheAmericanCivilWarwas______.
U.S.presidentsnormallyservea(n)______term.
TheinterviewerusedtocareaboutallthefollowingthingsEXCEPT
Fromthefirstparagraph,wegettheimpressionthatWhichofthefollowingadjectivesdoesNOTdescribethemother?
Women’seducationintheMiddleAgeswasintendedtomakethemintogoodChristians,butintheRenaissancetheideawasto____
DidMarcoPoloTelltheTruth?ThereisacontroversyaboutMarcoPolo’striptoChina.DidMarcoPolotellthetruth?Ifyo
WeliveinsouthernCaliforniagrowinggrapes,afirstgenerationofvintners,ourhomeadjacenttothevineyardsandthewinery
随机试题
下列关于斜疝与直疝的描述,错误的是()。
A.垂体ACTH微腺瘤B.小细胞性肺癌C.肾上腺皮质腺瘤D.肾上腺皮质腺癌E.肾上腺皮质结节状增生(2006年)引起Cushing病的原因是
生物半衰期清除率
我国《建筑法》规定,涉及建筑主体和承重结构变动的装修工程,建设单位应当在施工前委托原设计单位或()提出设计方案。
国内航班和国际航班的机场建设费缴纳标准均为每人50元人民币。()
初中学生学习了金属的化学性质,在高中阶段又有金属的化学性质这一课的学习:许多教师发现,一些学生初中部分的知识掌握不好,但到了高中,由于理解力增强.对金属的化学性质理解很深,这种迁移现象是()。
设计问卷调查题时,“你喜欢教师这一受人尊敬的职业吗”,“医生认为吸烟对人体有害,你同意吗”,这类问题或带有倾向性,或带有诱导性,因此容易使被调查者在趋同心理的支配下,作出与本人真实想法相反的回答。作者想表达的观点是()。
设f(x,y)在点(0,0)的某邻域U内连续,且(常数a>0),则()
若已包括头文件<string.h>且已有定义chars1[18],s2={"ABCDE"}和inti,现要将字符串"ABCDE"赋给s1,下列语句错误的是()
______forthetimelyinvestmentfromthegeneralpublic,ourcompanywouldnotbesothrivingasitis.
最新回复
(
0
)