首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Although it can be argued that voice, and e-mail are more efficient, and in many ways, more convenient, I still prefer to commun
Although it can be argued that voice, and e-mail are more efficient, and in many ways, more convenient, I still prefer to commun
admin
2011-05-17
43
问题
Although it can be argued that voice, and e-mail are more efficient, and in many ways, more convenient, I still prefer to communicate in person, or if that is not possible, by telephone. In my experience, face-to-face interactions are best for a number of reasons. In the first place, when you hear the speaker’s tone of voice, you are better able to judge the attitude and emotions that can be easily hidden in a written reply. In addition, the exchange is more immediate. Even instant messaging isn’t as fast as a verbal interaction in person or by phone. E-mail seems efficient; however, sometimes multiple messages over several days are required to clarify the information that a short phone call would have taken care of in one communication. We have all tried to return a voice mail only to hear a recording on the original caller’s voice mail. Clearly, no real communication is possible in a situation that only allows one person to talk. Moreover, the body language and the expression on the speaker’s face often communicate more than the words themselves. Research indicates that more than 80 percent of a message is nonverbal. The way that a speaker stands or sits can indicate interest or disagreement. The eye contact and the movement of the eyebrows and the mouth can actually communicate the opposite of the words that the speaker is saying. Finally, no technology has succeeded in duplicating a firm handshake to close a deal, a hug to encourage a friend, or a kiss goodbye. Until e-mail and voice mail can provide the subtle communication, the immediate interaction , and the emotional satisfaction of a face-to-face conversation, complete with facial expressions and gestures, I will prefer to talk instead of to type.
Which of the following statements is NOT TRUE?
选项
A、More than 80% of a message is nonverbal.
B、When people say "yes" , actually you may tell they mean "no" by watching v their body language.
C、E-mail isn’t necessarily as efficient as it seems.
D、Instant messaging is certainly faster than verbal interaction in person or by phone.
答案
D
解析
细节题。A、B、C在文章中都有所提及。关于D选项, 文中提到:甚至是即时通信服务业也没有当面的口头交流或者电话交流那么迅速。由此可知D选项是不对的, 因此本题选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/snmd777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语卫生类B级题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语卫生类B级
职称英语
相关试题推荐
1.Insuchachanging,complexsocietyformerlysimplesolutionstoinformationalneedsbecomecomplicated.Manyoflife’sprobl
1.TheUSeconomy,whichmakesuponequarterofworldeconomicoutput,isslowingsharply,andbringingdowngrowththroughthe
Lookatthetenstatementsforthispart.Youwillhearastoryabout"CommunicationThroughTime".Decidewhetheryou
Lookatthequestionsforthispart.Youwillhearastoryentitled"ShoppingforBargains".Forquestions24-30,indic
THETRAINJOURNEY0YouknowIwasgoingdowntoLondontostaywithmyfriend00Aliceduringtheholidays.Well,thetr
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrue,accordingtothepassage?Whoemptiesthebasket?
PainAllofUShavefeltpain.Wehaveheadaches.SomeofUSsufferpainrarelycutourselves.Wehavebeenburned.Orwehaveh
Hisqualificationssurpassthejobrequirements.
Shewillbeverypleasedtomeetyou.
IrarelyweararaincoatbecauseIspendmostofmytimeinacar.
随机试题
现有四种设备A、B、C、D可供选择,其寿命周期费用依次分别为240万元、220万元、200万元、180万元。生产率依次分别为800吨/日、765吨/日、710吨/日、600吨/日。从系统效率中生产率这一项来比较,选择费用效率最好的。
促使语言发生变化的原因有()
急性胰腺炎治疗的关键是
男,45岁,一周前因急性阑尾炎,进行手术治疗时阑尾系膜出血,缝扎止血时致回肠末段血运障碍,行回肠部分切除吻合术,腹腔引流,间断性引出血性液每日约200ml,查体:腹胀,右侧腹压痛,未触及肿块,鸣音弱.BP120/82mmHg,P20次/分,WBC12×1
洗胃时,每次灌入量应在300~500ml,如灌入过多会发生
机场费的英文不是()
JIT采购,是一种完全以满足库存为依据的采购方法。需求方根据自己的需要,对供应商下达订货指令,要求供应商在指定的时间、将指定的品种、指定的数量送到指定的地点。()
现行法律对中小学生的身份表述是:中小学生是在国家法律认可的各级各类中等或初等学校或教育机构中接受教育的()。
中国古代的数学家取得了举世瞩目的成就,下列古代数学家与其成就对应不正确的一项是()。
政府的自我监督可以分为()。
最新回复
(
0
)