首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
55
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Psychopathic or Machiavellian people are expected to make the laws probably because
选项
A、common people are tired of the current policy-makers.
B、policy-making will be based on utilitarianism.
C、they are good at making laws and policies.
D、they are likely to bring up brand-new policies.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Theearliestcontroversiesabouttherelationshipbetweenphotographyandartcenteredonwhetherphotograph’sfidelitytoappea
AccordingtoLouisSeck,theIsraeliproject______.
Accordingtolegend,theancientOlympicGameswerefoundedbyHeracles,asonofZeus.YetthefirstOlympicGamesforwhich
OCaptain!MyCaptain!waswrittenfor
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.Therecanbefewprospectofraisingthesortofsumsne
OnMay13,1940,WinstonChurchill,thenewlyappointedBritishPrimeMinister,gavehisfirstspeechtoParliament.Hewasprep
ThereisNoWaybutAheadYes,sciencehashelpedcreateproblems,too—seriousones.Andwemustlabortosolvethem—intheo
A、JabalitoldapressconferencethatIsraeliarmywereresponsibleforthedeathofthetwoteenagers.B、AnIsraeliarmyspokes
我的藏书都像是我的朋友,而且是密友。我虽然对它们并不是每一本都认识,它们中的每一本却都认识我。我每一走进我的书斋,书籍们立即活跃起来,我仿佛能听到它们向我问好的声音,我仿佛能看到它们向我招手的情景,倘若有人问我,书籍的嘴在什么地方?而手又在什么地方呢?我只
随机试题
关于化学位移伪影的解释,错误的是
A.观察B.吸氧C.立即剖宫产D.减弱宫缩E.静滴催产素初产妇,32岁,38周妊娠,宫口扩张至5cm时胎膜自破,羊水量多,2度混浊。胎心率132次/分,宫缩持续60~70秒,间隙2~3分钟,强度强,并有胎心率同步减慢,应如何处理
患者3年来经常心悸,气短。检查:心尖搏动稍向左下移位,心浊音界稍向左下扩大,心尖部听诊可闻及3/6级以上粗糙的收缩期吹风样杂音及舒张期隆隆样杂音。应首先考虑的是()
[2008年第105题]实际变压器工作时()。
《环境空气质量标准》规定SO2浓度限值类型有()。
城市规划的实施是为了使城市的功能与物质性设施及空间组织之间不断地协调,下列关于这种协调主要体现的方面叙述错误的是()。
北京某中韩合资高科技企业从韩国进口一批产品,经天津口岸入境。该企业在货物运抵天津口岸之前已向北京海关录入《进口报关单》的电子数据,北京海关接受了申报并审核了报关单信息。审结后,北京海关将《进口转关货物申报单》电子数据传输至天津海关。10天后.该货物运到天津
民法的渊源是指()。
2022年5月12日,国家主席习近平同斯洛文尼亚共和国总统帕霍尔互致贺电,庆祝两国建交()周年。
1952
最新回复
(
0
)