首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
37
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Psychopathic or Machiavellian people are expected to make the laws probably because
选项
A、common people are tired of the current policy-makers.
B、policy-making will be based on utilitarianism.
C、they are good at making laws and policies.
D、they are likely to bring up brand-new policies.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichwordisnotusedbyNorberg-HodgetodescribetheLadakhipeople?
Note-takingSkillsNote-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityinmanyskills,particularlyinthefollowingfourmostimport
Cultureshockisapainfulexperiencewegothroughwhenweencountermanynewthingsinanothercountryandwe【1】______insom
FairFaresRailways:CheaperTicketsWillNotSolveRail’sProblemsMostofthetime,parliamentarycommitteereportsembody
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
______isthecapitalcityofTexas.
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.Therecanbefewprospectofraisingthesortofsumsne
ThelargestcityintheUnitedStatesis
ANicePlacetoVisitHavingheardthatTorontowasbecomingoneofthecontinent’snoblestcities,weflewfromNewYorkto
Inthe1990s,MicrosoftInternetExplorerbattledNetscapeNavigatorinthegreatWebbrowserwars.Inthe2000s,GoogleandYah
随机试题
社会主义民主政治的组织原则是()
过清音常见于肺组织含气量增多、弹性减弱时,如____________;
下列关于五脏所藏的叙述,错误的是()
某系统性红斑狼疮女病人,病史2年,近日体温升高,关节红肿有压痛,出现面部红斑、蛋白尿而入院治疗,下列处理哪项不妥()。
金融衍生工具从基础工具分类角度,可以划分为()。①股权类产品的衍生工具②货币衍生工具③利率衍生工具④信用衍生工具⑤嵌入式衍生工具
在我国,公布法律的权限属于()。
我国工业上俗称的“烧碱”是指()。
检察监督主要是在诉讼中通过法定的程序实现的。()
循环经济实质上是一种生态经济。与传统经济不同,循环经济是一种与环境和谐的经济发展模式,它要求把经济活动组织到一个经济循环中,使物质和能源在这个循环中得到合理和持久的利用,从而把经济活动对自然环境的不利影响降到最小,实现整个社会的可持续发展。中国从1998
设一阶非齐次线性微分方程y’+p(x)y=Q(x)有两个线性无关的解y1,y2,若αy1+βy2也是该方程的解,则应有α+β=____________.
最新回复
(
0
)