首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
49
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Psychopathic or Machiavellian people are expected to make the laws probably because
选项
A、common people are tired of the current policy-makers.
B、policy-making will be based on utilitarianism.
C、they are good at making laws and policies.
D、they are likely to bring up brand-new policies.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Duringthereignof______,WaleswasbroughtunderEnglishrule.
_____isthesecondlargestcountryintheworld.
Onemajorobstacletoeconomicdevelopmentispopulationgrowth.Thepopulationsofmostdevelopingcountriesgrewataratemuc
FairFaresRailways:CheaperTicketsWillNotSolveRail’sProblemsMostofthetime,parliamentarycommitteereportsembody
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.ThissayingoftenattributedwiththelateDuchessofWindsorembodiesmuchofthe【M1】____
Australiaistheworld’s______largestcountryintermsofland.
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanygreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthequestion,itwi
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanygreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthequestion,itwi
A、JabalitoldapressconferencethatIsraeliarmywereresponsibleforthedeathofthetwoteenagers.B、AnIsraeliarmyspokes
随机试题
下列因素中,与经济增长率成反比关系的是()。
感受器的适应现象表现在持续刺激条件下()
A.蠲痹汤B.三痹汤C.独活寄生汤D.六味地黄丸E.虎潜丸治疗类风湿关节炎肾虚寒凝证,应首选
上海现代中医药股份公司、国内外专家与美国FDA官员围绕扶正化淤片美国Ⅱ期临床试验进行了长时间的合作攻关,扶正化淤片成功完成美国Ⅱ期临床试验是世界肝纤维化治疗领域的重大突破,不仅填补了西方医学界的空白,也使其有望成为首个获准进入美国主流医药市场的复方中药,是
A.1000元以下罚款B.5000元以上1万元以下的罚款C.5000元以上2万元以下的罚款D.1万元以上3万元以下的罚款E.3万元以上5万元以下的罚款擅自扩大麻黄素生产能力或增加生产计划的单位,处以
桥梁拆除工程必须由具备()专业承包资质的单位施工,严禁将工程非法转包。
下列属于完全竞争型市场的行业是()。
企业出售交易性金融资产时,要将原计入公允价值变动损益的金额转入营业外收入中。()
按照我国现行税法,一般纳税人在转让房地产时应该缴纳的税种有()。
下列选择中,不能用做标识符的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)