首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
39
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Psychopathic or Machiavellian people are expected to make the laws probably because
选项
A、common people are tired of the current policy-makers.
B、policy-making will be based on utilitarianism.
C、they are good at making laws and policies.
D、they are likely to bring up brand-new policies.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
There’sadirtylittleSecretinmanyAmericanhomes--couplesfightaboutthehousework.It’sNo.1issuemyhusbandandIargue
A、InBritain.B、InAustralia.C、InItaly.D、Noneoftheabove.C
Onemajorobstacletoeconomicdevelopmentispopulationgrowth.Thepopulationsofmostdevelopingcountriesgrewataratemuc
Onemajorobstacletoeconomicdevelopmentispopulationgrowth.Thepopulationsofmostdevelopingcountriesgrewataratemuc
Ourtheoriesabouthumandiseasearetheproductofcurrentfashion【M1】______thanwewouldliketoadmit.Butjustasthe
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
______referstotherepetitionofthesamesoundsatthebeginningofwords.
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.ThissayingoftenattributedwiththelateDuchessofWindsorembodiesmuchofthe【M1】____
Educationalphilosophyhaschangedagreatdealinthe50yearssinceIwasinschool.Backthen,forexample,Ihadthehighe
我的藏书都像是我的朋友,而且是密友。我虽然对它们并不是每一本都认识,它们中的每一本却都认识我。我每一走进我的书斋,书籍们立即活跃起来,我仿佛能听到它们向我问好的声音,我仿佛能看到它们向我招手的情景,倘若有人问我,书籍的嘴在什么地方?而手又在什么地方呢?我只
随机试题
下列关于“任务管理器”的叙述,不正确的是()
现代学制改革发展的趋向表现在哪几方面?
诊断肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的主要依据是
患儿,10岁。上前牙牙龈时常流脓1月余。检查:左上1远中舌面深龋,探无反应,无穿髓孔,松动Ⅰ度,叩痛(+),冷热测无反应,唇侧牙龈近根尖处有一窦道口。临床治疗应选择
王先生因新房装修与某地板公司签订一份购买并安装地板的合同,购买了该公司生产的某品牌的地板,并由该公司派人进行了安装。数日后,王先生发现地板的踢脚线拱起多处,遂与地板公司交涉。王先生提出的下列诉讼请求,哪些不予以支持?()
气体灭火系统是一种比较常见的灭火系统,能取得良好的灭火效果。气体灭火系统按其结构特点可分为()。
自然人转让的房地产坐落地与其居住地不在同一地的,土地增值税的纳税地点是()。
幼儿情绪情感的发展有哪些趋努?
简述根面龋治疗的原则和注意事项。
在VisualFoxPro中,使用SQL的CREATETABLE语句建立数据库表时,使用【】子句说明主索引。
最新回复
(
0
)