首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A triumph for scientific freedom This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warr
A triumph for scientific freedom This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warr
admin
2010-01-10
27
问题
A triumph for scientific freedom
This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren— toppled the conventional wisdom in more ways than one. They proved that most ulcers were caused by a lowly bacterium, which was an outrageous idea at the time. But they also showed that if science is to advance, scientists need the freedom and the funding to let their imaginations roam.
Let’s start with the Nobel pair’s gut instincts. In the late 1970s, the accepted medical theory was that ulcers were caused by stress, smoking, and alcohol. But when pathologist Warren cranked up his microscope to a higher-than-usual magnification, he was surprised to find S-shaped bacteria in specimens taken from patients with gastritis. By 1982, Marshall, only 30 years old and still in training at Australia’s Royal Perth Hospital, and Warren, the more seasoned physician to whom he was assigned, were convinced that the bacteria were living brazenly in a sterile, acidic zone—the stomach—that medical texts had declared uninhabitable.
Marshall and Warren’s attempts to culture the bacteria repeatedly failed. But then they caught a lucky breaker rather, outbreak. Drug-resistant staph was sweeping through the hospital. Preoccupied with the infections, lab techs left Marshall’s and Warren’s petri dishes to languish in a dark, humid incubator over the long Easter holiday. Those five days were enough time to grow a crop of strange, translucent microbes.
Marshall later demonstrated that ulcer-afflicted patients harbored the same strain of bacteria. In 1983, he began successfully treating these sufferers with antibiotics and bismuth (the active ingredient in Pepto-Bismol). That same year, at an infectious disease conference in Belgium, a questioner in the audience asked Marshall if he thought bacteria caused at least some stomach ulcers. Marshall shot back that he believed bacteria caused all stomach ulcers.
Those were fighting words. The young physician from Perth was telling the field’s academically pedigreed experts that they had it all wrong. "It was impossible to displace the dogma," Marshall explained to me in a jaunty, wide-ranging conversation several years ago. "Their agenda was to shut me up and get me out of gastroenterology and into general practice in the outback."
At first, Marshall couldn’t produce the crowning scientific proof of his claim: inducing ulcers in animals by feeding them the bacterium. So in 1984, as he later reported in the Medical Journal of Australia. "a 32-year-old man, a light smoker and social drinker who had no known gastrointestinal disease or family history of peptic ulceration"—a superb test subject, in other words—" swallowed the growth from’ a flourishing three-day culture of the isolate."
The volunteer was Marshall himself, Five days later, and for seven mornings in a row, he experienced the classic and unpretty symptoms of severe gastritis.
Helicobacter pylori have since been blamed not only for the seething inflammation ,of ulcers but also for virtually all stomach cancer. Marshall’s antibiotic treatment has replaced surgery as standard care. And the wise guy booed off the stage at scientific meetings has just won the Nobel Prize.
What does all this have to do with scientific freedom? Today, US government funding favors "hypothesis-driven" rather than "hypothesis-generating" research. In the former, a scientist starts with a safe supposition and conducts the experiment to prove or disprove the idea. "If you want to get research funding; you better make sure that you’ve got the experiment half done," Marshall told me. "You have to prove it works before they’ll fund you to test it out."
By contrast, in hypothesis-generating research, the scientist inches forward by hunch, gathering clues and speculating on their meaning. The payoff is never clear. With today’s crimped science budgets and intense competition for grants, such risky research rarely gets funded. Proceeding on intuition, Mar- shall told me, "is a luxury that not many researchers have."
It helps, he added, to be an outsider. "The people who have got a stake in the old technology arc never the ones to embrace the new technology. It’s always someone a bit on the periphery--who hasn’t got anything to gain by the status quo—who is interested in changing it."
This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine proved that most ulcers were caused by a lowly bacterium,
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
从文章第一段前两句可知本句话正确
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tCt7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B15】
Fromthepassagewelearnhowadigitalcameraworkswithsomeprinciplesandprocesses.Withtheimprovementofdigitalimagin
Theword"staple"(Line1,Para.1)probablymeans"______".Theauthorthinksthatareporter’sdutyonthesceneofanaccident
Onvacations,peoplecantakeatriptoeverycomerofAmericaexceptgreatsectionsofdesert.BecausethenumberofcarsinA
______(不言而喻)thatthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnologyisvitalmthemodernizationofChina.
A、GrowingpotatoesinIreland.B、Drinkingverystrongliquors.C、Failingtogrowpotatoes.D、Brewingaverystrongliquorfromt
A、Heinformedthetouristsoftheiritinerary.B、Hetriedtosellatour.C、Heansweredthequestionsfromthetourists.D、Heta
A、Shehastomeetafriend.B、ShehastoflytoArgentina.C、Shehastoattendameeting.D、Shehastolunchwiththemannextw
HarlemRenaissancereferstoaperiodlastingformorethan10years,duringwhichagroupofAfricanandAmericanwritersprodu
Almostallcompaniesinvolvedinnewproductionanddevelopmentmust______.Alltheessentialservicesonwhichwedependare
随机试题
下列关于设备监理的叙述,不正确的有()。
对甲,乙,丙三人作案情况有以下猜测:(1)甲没有作案,并且乙作案。(2)甲作案,则乙作案。(3)乙作案,则丙也作案。(4)丙作案。事后经过调查。发现上述猜测只正确了一个。则以下哪项正确?
磷酸戊糖途径的重要生理功能是生成
承包人因自身原因实际施工落后于进度计划,若此时工程的某部位施工与其他承包人发生干扰,工程师发布指示改变了他的施工时间和顺序导致施工成本的增加和效率降低,此时,承包人( )。
一、背景A机电安装公司承包了3000m室外压力管道的安装工程,因工期紧,且施工期间阴雨较多。项目部为了保证工程质量,把室外压力管道安装分为原材料检验、管架制作安装、管道预制、管道安装、管道焊接、管道试验、管道保温、管道吹扫等工序,按照对
某双代号网络计划中,假设计划工期等于计算工期,且工作M的开始节点和完成节点均为关键节点。关于工作M的说法,正确的是()。
根据个人所得税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,暂免征收个人所得税的有()。(2015年)
孟母择邻的故事表明环境因素决定着人的身心发展变化。()
患者,女性,18岁。自幼多个牙齿色深暗着色,无其他不适,要求诊治。病史采集应询问的内容,以下哪项不是重点()。
AnswerQuestions71to80byreferringtothecommentson4differentcarmodelsinthefollowingmagazinearticle.Answereach
最新回复
(
0
)