首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Neurotechnology has long been a favorite of science-fiction writers. In Neuromancer, a wildly inventive book by William Gibson w
Neurotechnology has long been a favorite of science-fiction writers. In Neuromancer, a wildly inventive book by William Gibson w
admin
2020-01-11
35
问题
Neurotechnology has long been a favorite of science-fiction writers. In Neuromancer, a wildly inventive book by William Gibson written in 1984, people can use neural implants to jack into the sensory experiences of others. The idea of a neural lace, a mesh that grows into the brain, was conceived by Iain M. Banks in his "Culture" series of novels. The Terminal Man by Michael Crichton, published in 1972, imagines the effects of a brain implant on someone who is convinced that machines are taking over from humans. (Spoiler: not good.)
Where the sci-fi genre led, philosophers are now starting to follow. In Howard Chizeck’s lab at the University of Washington, researchers are working on an implanted device to administer deep-brain stimulation (DBS) in order to treat a common movement disorder called essential tremor. Conventionally, DBS stimulation is always on, wasting energy and depriving the patient of a sense of control. The lab’s ethicist, Tim Brown, a doctoral student of philosophy, says that some DBS patients suffer a sense of alienation and complain of feeling like a robot.
To change that, the team at the University of Washington is using neuronal activity associated with intentional movements as a trigger for turning the device on. But the researchers also want to enable patients to use a conscious thought process to override these settings. That is more useful than it might sound: stimulation currents for essential tremor can cause side-effects like distorted speech, so someone about to give a presentation, say, might wish to shake rather than slur his words.
Giving humans more options of this sort will be essential if some of the bolder visions for brain-computer interfaces are to be realised. Hannah Maslen from the University of Oxford is another ethicist who works on a BCI project, in this case a neural speech prosthesis being developed by a consortium of European researchers. One of her jobs is to think through the distinctions between inner speech and public speech: people need a dependable mechanism for separating out what they want to say from what they think.
That is only one of many ethical questions that the sci-fi versions of brain-computer interfaces bring up. What protection will BCIs offer against neural hacking? Who owns neural data, including information that is gathered for research purposes now but may be decipherable in detail at some point in the future? Where does accountability lie if a user does something wrong? And if brain implants are performed not for therapeutic purposes but to augment people’s abilities, will that make the world an even more unequal place?
For some, these sorts of questions cannot be asked too early: more than any other new technology, BCIs may redefine what it means to be human. For others, they are premature. "The societal-justice problem of who gets access to enhanced memory or vision is a question for the next decades, not years, " says Thomas Cochrane, a neurologist and director of neuroethics at the Centre for Bioethics at Harvard Medical School.
In truth, both arguments are right. It is hard to find anyone who argues that visions of whole-brain implants and AI-human symbiosis are impossible to realize; but harder still to find anyone who thinks something so revolutionary will happen in the near future.
What can we know from the description of Paragraph 2?
选项
A、Researchers are working on an implanted device to waste energy.
B、An implanted device can utilize deep-brain stimulation to treat movement disorder.
C、DBS patients enjoy a sense of alienation and a feeling like a robot.
D、An implanted device can treat a common language disorder.
答案
B
解析
根据题干定位至第2段。题目问从第2段的描述中,我们能了解到什么。研究人员研发植入式设备是为了治疗运动障碍,而非浪费能量,A项表述错误;C项“DBS患者很享受隔离与像机器人的感觉”,与原文内容相反;D项“植入式设备能治疗语言紊乱”,与原文不符。因此正确答案为B项“植入式设备利用深部脑刺激(DBS)来治疗被称为特发性震颤的一种常见的运动障碍”,其与原文一致。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tKwO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Manypeoplevisitmuseumswhentheytraveltonewplaces.Whydoyouthinkpeoplevisitmuseums?Usespecificreasonsandexampl
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Advertisingcantellyoualotaboutacountry.Usespecificreasonsand
"BuildingwithArches"RoundArchandVaultAlthoughtheroundarchwasusedbytheancientpeoplesofMesopotamiaseveral
"OrganicArchitecture"Oneofthemoststrikingpersonalitiesinthedevelopmentofearly-twentieth-centuryarchitecturewas
Whatdothestudentandprofessoragreethatthestudentshoulddoaspartofherresearch?Clickon3answers.
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantforlearningaboutprehistoricsocieties,forwhom
Becauseof______,mastiffbatsrequireconsiderablespacetotakeoffinflight.
IMPACTSANDMASSEXTINCTIONS(1)Meteoritesandimpactcratersbearwitnesstothefactthatlargeimpactsoccasionallyoccu
Inanybusinesssituation,therecomesatimetobringtoaclosedeliberation,discussionandanalysis,andtotakeaction.
"Youunderstandgrandmotherwhenshetalkstoyou,don’tyou,darling?"Thegirlnods.Johnson,thereporter,mether—andherDa
随机试题
下列除哪项外均为结核结节的成分
电子汇划清算核算基本模式包括()
A、环磷酰胺B、柔红霉素C、甲氨蝶呤D、长春新碱E、地塞米松能引起出血性膀胱炎的化疗药物是
下列关于原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的手术治疗方案应选择
上述临床表现最可能的诊断是该患者的治疗,下列不妥的是
关于框架结构,说法错误的是()。
下列关于流动性偏好理论的基本观点中,正确的是()。
法律草案表决通过后,该法律()。
谈运河就不能不谈到扬州,谈扬州就不能不谈到瘦西湖。当年决定让运河在这里分道入城的那个人或许只是默默无闻之辈,但他无意中却做成了中国文化史上的一段佳话。那么密集的拱桥和亭阁,那么精致的园林,那么多浓得化不开的人文历史。平山堂前唱曲的欧阳修,曲栏歌院纵酒的杜牧
新兴技术的发展,总是面临诸多困难,实际应用难以符合其过高的预期,从而使对新兴技术的期望迅速走低。假若这项新兴技术能够坚持前行,不断完善而达到成熟,最终就有望得到广泛应用。但许多新兴技术在泡沫破灭之后,或由于缺乏资金的继续投入或由于技术本身的缺陷,并不能重新
最新回复
(
0
)