首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
admin
2020-03-30
64
问题
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.
California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.
The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.
They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information — is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of "cloud computing," meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.
Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.
As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.
But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.
The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to______.
选项
A、prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents
B、search for suspects’ mobile phones without a warrant
C、check suspects’ phone contents without being authorized
D、prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones
答案
C
解析
此题细节信息定位到第一段第二句话:“The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.”说明最高法院在考虑是否允许警察在逮捕过程中无搜查许可证搜查嫌疑人手机内容, “check suspects’phone contents without being authorized”符合文意,其中“check”可以替换为“search”,其他选项的说法均与原文不符,因此选择C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/thTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
ManycountrieswillnotallowcigaretteadvertisingintheirnewspapersoronTVespeciallysincetheadvertisementsareusually
ThejournalScienceisaddinganextraroundofstatisticalcheckstoitspeer-reviewprocess,editor-in-chiefMarciaMcNuttann
ThejournalScienceisaddinganextraroundofstatisticalcheckstoitspeer-reviewprocess,editor-in-chiefMarciaMcNuttann
Forlaymenethnologyisprobablythemostinterestingofthebiologicalsciencesfortheveryreasonthatitconcernsanimalsin
Youareexposedtoobtrusiveadsthat______seeminglyfromnowhereevenwhenyouaredisconnectedfromtheNet,andyourperson
【T1】TheSinglelongastockfigureinstories,songsandpersonalads,wastraditionallysomeoneatthemarginsofsociety;afi
【T1】TheSinglelongastockfigureinstories,songsandpersonalads,wastraditionallysomeoneatthemarginsofsociety;afi
TheSocialSecurityActdidnotincludehealthinsurancebecausethecommissionconsideredthatitsinclusionwouldjeopardizet
Recentresearchfromanimalbehavioristssuggeststhat"asthecrowflies"shouldnolongerbetakentomean"theshortestdista
SuccessnowseemedveryremoteandBernardfelt______aboutit.
随机试题
视频内容的基本组成单位是()。
在我国,民事诉讼主体包括
耳屏前形成的皮肤盲管可能是由于
下列表面活性剂毒性按大小顺序排列,正确的是
男性,39岁,车祸后右股骨干骨折行胫骨结节骨牵引,能预防过度牵引的处理措施是
建筑节能工程为单位建筑工程的一个()工程。
某幼儿园聘请甲担任幼儿班教师。某日上午,幼儿班课间休息时,甲离校打电话,几个幼儿在教室里的炉火旁烤火,其中乙(6岁)和丙(5岁)发生打斗,乙用石块将丙头部打破,而丙则把乙按在火炉上,乙烫伤。为此丙花去医药费500元,乙花去医药费5000元。下列说法错误的有
阅读以下相关的说明,根据要求回答问题1~问题3。[说明]系统集成商Y公司承担了某游戏软件开发项目的研发工作,Y公司任命庞工为项目经理。该游戏软件开发项目的各项工作的名称、工作持续时间、所需人力资源类型及其相应的工作量估计见表4-11。
以下关于C语言数据类型使用的叙述中错误的是
Therateatwhichmanhasbeenstoringupusefulknowledgeabouthimselfandtheuniversehasbeenspiralingupwardfor10,000y
最新回复
(
0
)