首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The difficulties facing British Steel have quickly become part of the Brexit debate. Business is naturally cautious about enteri
The difficulties facing British Steel have quickly become part of the Brexit debate. Business is naturally cautious about enteri
admin
2019-11-19
51
问题
The difficulties facing British Steel have quickly become part of the Brexit debate. Business is naturally cautious about entering into political debates, but it should not remain silent when it features so prominently in the public discourse. Industry has a responsibility to ensure its views are accurately represented.
There can be no doubt that the ongoing Brexit uncertainty has contributed significantly to British Steel’ s problems. Unable to decipher what the UK/EU trading relationship will be in just five months’ time, planning has become
fiendishly
complicated for both UK exporters and their EU customers. The timing is particularly bad, with the EU having recently imposed "safeguard" measures to prevent a surge in steel imports resulting from protectionist action elsewhere. Post-Brexit, UK steel exports to Europe will be restricted by these measures, with a disorderly no-deal Brexit affecting them particularly badly.
Then there is the longer-term question of whether a well-managed Brexit could provide any notable benefits to steel producers. There have been claims in recent days about the ability of the UK government to use state aid more extensively to support the steel industry once it is outside the EU. Most importantly, this disregards the fact that the UK steel sector has no interest in operating under the support of state subsidies, and ignores a number of other important technical points.
First, the UK’s ability to provide state aid support will remain restricted, although less so, by its WTO membership, which bans certain subsidies outright, and allows others to be counteracted by other WTO members with the imposition of "anti-subsidy duties"—effectively closing off important export markets. Second, the EU has systematically required alignment on state aid rules in all its FTAs (free trade agreements) since 2006, and a UK-EU FTA would be no different. The US and others would insist on similar provisions in their FTAs with the UK, meaning that if the UK want to take full advantage of their ability to make new trade agreements they will continue to be restricted in their use of state aid.
None of this is to say that the UK can’ t ultimately deliver similar trading conditions outside the EU, depending on the colour of Brexit eventually chosen, simply that a huge amount of effort will be required, and disruption caused, in order to replicate the status quo. In short, it must be honest in stating that Brexit will not improve the situation for the steel sector but it has the potential to cause a great deal of damage. The No. 1 priority to improve the outlook for steel, and the wider manufacturing sector, is to secure a withdrawal agreement as soon as possible, ending this uncertainty and avoiding the turmoil of a no-deal Brexit.
Looking beyond Brexit, many of the measures that could help the steel industry are already within the government’s gift. We have long called on the government to tackle the UK’s sky-high industrial electricity prices, now twice the price of those in France, placing an additional £85m a year cost on the sector, money that should instead be spent on much needed capital investment. Moreover, UK business rates are five to ten times higher than elsewhere in the EU, perversely increasing costs for those that modernise and upgrade. Government must act on these issues and others if they want to secure a sustainable future for steel in the UK.
These are of course challenging times, but the steel sector is an enduring one. Society will continue to require steel and the UK will continue to supply it, provided they are given the right foundations to do so competitively.
According to the passage, what is the most influential factor to the development of the UK’s steel industry?
选项
A、The fierce competition of other countries.
B、The "safeguard" measures of the EU.
C、The uncertainty of the ongoing Brexit.
D、The inadequacy of its own structure.
答案
C
解析
根据题干关键词定位到第二段。第二段讲述了一系列对英国钢铁行业有影响的因素。题干询问“最重要的因素”和原文中的has contributed significantly为同义复现,故C项“英国退欧的不确定性”正确,A项“其他国家的激烈竞争”和B项“欧盟的‘保护’政策”虽然也是影响因素之一,但并非最重要的影响因素。D项“自身结构的缺陷”,文中未提及,无中生有,排除。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ty2Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【B1】______ofthesenati
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【B1】______ofthesenati
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【B1】______ofthesenati
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【B1】______ofthesenati
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【B1】______ofthesenati
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【B1】______ofthesenati
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【B1】______ofthesenati
随机试题
模具型腔常用的仿形铣削工作方式有()。
公司利润分配应当首先()。
使用最小二乘法估计出证券A的收益回归方程为:RA=10.2+1.3RI,假设市场有10%的预期回报,则A的收益率为()
徐先生现年45岁,在一家知名外资企业担任部门经理,每月工资收入为17000元。由于徐先生现住地与上班地点相距较远,加之公司附近小区可能有较好的升值空间,他决定在公司附近再买一套住房。徐先生经过慎重考虑看中了一套总价90万元的二居室新房,为此准备向银行贷款6
下列关于个人汽车贷款的审批的说法中不正确的是()。
甲外商投资者1996年在上海设立中外合资房地产公司,经营期为25年,2000年获利。近年发生以下业务:(1)2001年,该投资者将当年分得利润200万元直接投资于本公司,增加注册资本。(2)2002年底,又将当年分得利润450万元直接再投资
为什么说现代经济是信用经济?
计划工作的基本内容是:市场占有率预测;预测未来环境可能发生的变化;拟订和选择实现目标的方案:方案的评价和选择;确定目标。()
问:是同一函数的原函数吗?
声卡控制声音的输入输出,当波形声音输入计算机时,混音芯片要完成多项功能。下列______不是它的功能( )
最新回复
(
0
)