首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
admin
2015-06-14
97
问题
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these strange creatures? Are they chief executives or labour leaders? Heads of pre-industrial guilds or champions of one of America’s most successful industries? Defenders of civilisation or merciless rack-renters?
Whatever they might be, they are at the heart of a political firestorm. Anger about the cost of college extends from the preppiest of parents to the grungiest of Occupiers. Mr. Obama is trying to channel the anger, to avoid being sideswiped by it. The White House invitation complained that costs have trebled in the past three decades. Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, has urged universities to address costs with "much greater urgency".
A sense of urgency is justified: ex-students have debts approaching $1 trillion. But calm reflection is needed too. America’s universities suffer from many maladies besides cost. And rising costs are often symptoms of much deeper problems: problems that were irritating during the years of affluence but which are cancerous in an age of austerity.
The first problem is the inability to say "no". For decades American universities have been offering more of everything—more courses for undergraduates, more research students for professors and more rock walls for everybody—on the merry assumption that there would always be more money to pay for it all. The second is Ivy League envy. The vast majority of American universities are obsessed by rising up the academic hierarchy, becoming a bit less like Yokel-U and a bit more like Yale.
Ivy League envy leads to an obsession with research. This can be a problem even in the best universities: students feel short-changed by professors fixated on crawling along the frontiers of knowledge with a magnifying glass. At lower-level universities it causes dysfunction. American professors of literature crank out 70,000 scholarly publications a year, compared with 13,757 in 1959. Most of these simply moulder: Mark Bauerlein of Emory University points out that, of the 16 research papers produced in 2004 by the University of Vermont’s literature department, a fairly representative institution, 11 have since received between zero and two citations. The time wasted writing articles that will never be read cannot be spent teaching. In "Academically Adrift" Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa argue that over a third of America’s students show no improvement in critical thinking or analytical reasoning after four years in college.
Popular anger about universities’ costs is rising just as technology is shaking colleges to their foundations. The Internet is changing the rules. Star academics can lecture to millions online rather than the chosen few in person. Testing and marking can be automated. And for-profit companies such as the University of Phoenix are stripping out costs by concentrating on a handful of popular courses as well as making full use of the Internet. The Sloan Foundation reports that online enrolments grew by 10% in 2010, against 2% for the sector as a whole.
Many universities’ first instinct will be to batten down the hatches and wait for this storm to pass. But the storm is not going to pass. The higher-education industry faces a stark choice: either adapt to a rapidly changing world or face a future of cheeseparing. It is surely better to rethink the career structure of your employees than to see it wither(the proportion of professors at four-year universities who are on track to win tenure fell from 50% in 1997 to 39% ten years later). And it is surely better to reform yourself than to have hostile politicians take you into receivership.
A growing number of universities are beginning to recognise this. They understand that the beginning of wisdom in academia, as in business in general, is choosing what not to do. They are in recovery from their Ivy League envy. They are also striking up relations with private-sector organisations. And a growing number of foundations, such as the Kauffman Foundation, are doing their best to spread the gospel of reform and renewal.
What does the fourth paragraph mainly talk about?
选项
A、It continues to analyze the problems.
B、It confirms the seriousness of the problem.
C、It introduces the background of American universities.
D、It shows challenges universities are confronted with.
答案
A
解析
语篇题。直接定位至第四段。第三段末句中的关键词“deeper problems”和第四段首句“The firstproblem is the inability to say‘no’.”又是一个顺承关系,可见第四段是一个承上启下的过渡段,对大学学费增加的问题进行深入地分析,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/u5OO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingnewspaperdoesNOTbelongtothebroadsheetofBritain?
IntroductiontotheSportsStudiesDepartmentThismini-lecturegivenbytheSportsStudiesDepartmentontheUniversity’sOpen
IntroductiontotheSportsStudiesDepartmentThismini-lecturegivenbytheSportsStudiesDepartmentontheUniversity’sOpen
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
Thestudyoftherelationshipbetweenlanguageandsocietyiscalled
______istheactperformedbyorresultingfromsayingsomething;itistheconsequenceof,orthechangebroughtaboutbythe
WhydoesOldFreddosomethingstupid?
IntheBlackForest,theacidrainissaidtoattackallEXCEPT
随机试题
下列哪项不是郁金的功效
对全冠龈边缘位置设计无影响的因素是()
由于心脏手术或洋地黄中毒引起的室性早搏,最好选用哪个药物治疗?()
泵的入口应加()。
过去25年中,尽管经历着通货膨胀和经济衰退,美国人的消费能力始终没有减退,背后最主要的推力就是个人信贷业的异常_________。尽管个别客户可能破产,但总体上,个人消费信贷是________的。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
阅读以下文字,完成问题。在人体生命科学探索的历史中,没有比“基因”二字更具有震撼力了。由于历史的原因,我们对基因一直采取拒绝承认的态度。直到70年代,经过科学家的努力,“基因”二字才被写进了科教书。现在基因已经被世界各国接受,人类基因组计划与曼哈
剧场效应:指由于个体成员追求自身利益最大化,引发其他成员效仿而导致集体秩序失衡,整体利益受损的现象。下列属于剧场效应的是:
如何通过强化组织文化来激发创新?
Whatwouldtheworldlooklikewithoutthedollardomination?USofficialsare【C1】______outadealtoendthegovernmentshutdow
【S1】【S10】
最新回复
(
0
)