首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
65
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that______.
选项
A、it is too dull to attend lectures
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
答案
D
解析
参考文章第一句,“the quality of lecturers varies greatly”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/u6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
FireandWaterShundagarhisavillageonIndia’seast-facingcoast.Itisavillageofsimplemudandgrasshousesbuilton
Oceanographyhasbeendefinedas"Theapplicationofallsciencestothestudyofthesea".Beforethenineteenthcentury,s
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Agreenhouseisabuildingmadeofglasswhichisusedforkeepingplantswarmwhentheoutsidetemperatureishow.Inasimilar
WhenItookhistemperature,itwastwodegreesabove______.
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
You______allthoseclothesbyhand!Youhaveawashing-machinetodothatkindofthing.
______intheopenair,wetclothescangetdryeasily.
Thesentence"______White______hissisteriscomingtoourhelp."iswrong.
随机试题
根据下面材料回答下列小题。自20世纪末期,山西同全国一样粮食供需形势发生逆转,粮价持续走低,粮食生产效益滑坡,农民生产积极性受挫。2004年初,中央下发“一号文件”,实施了“一减三补”等一系列惠农政策,之后连续三年出台中央“一号文件”,“保护和加强
外固定器的适应证有
浇口的数量越多越好,因为这样可是熔体很快充满型腔。
下列关于证据的说法正确的是:()
经济法主体中,受控主体和受制主体资格的取得,主要是依据()。
纳税人对税务机关做出的取消增值税一般纳税人资格的行为不服,必须先向上一级税务机关申请行政复议而不能直接进行诉讼。()
赵老师通过课文中的人物分析,引导学生分辨勇敢和鲁莽、谦让和退缩。这符合的心理现象是()。
HelpWantedAdOutstandingopportunitywithlocalrealestatecorporation.Requiresstrongbackgroundinrealestate,financ
(2012年下半年上午试题59)在13个元素构成的有序表M[1..13]中进行折半查找(向下取整),若找到的元素为M[4],则被比较的元素依次为______。
A、Itistheonlycompanydevelopingself-drivingcars.B、ItcooperateswithInfinitiindevelopingself-drivingcars.C、Itneeds
最新回复
(
0
)