首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
admin
2010-07-19
68
问题
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the sheep. The patent, if granted, would apply to "nuclear transfer technology" in both human and animal cells. One point of the patent is to help fund research into cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cancer and heart failure.
Its other aim is to make some money. Last May, the Roslin Institute was taken over by Geron, an American biotech company. Geron has committed $32.5 million to research at the Roslin. It wants to get its money back. Two scientists from Stanford who developed the use of restriction enzymes, one of the fundamental techniques in biotechnology, made about pounds 80 million out of it in the 17 years before the patent expired. So you can see why Geron-Roslin is so keen to get its patent. There’s nothing wrong with that. Without the prospect of a return at the end of investment, no one would ever lend money to anyone involved in bio-medical research—and given the huge sums now required to develop a new drug, or a new diagnostic test for some medical condition, that would mean there wouldn’t be any research. It is wonderful when people give money to worthwhile causes with no hope of personal gain. But appealing to altruism simply won’t raise the billions required to develop and market drugs and therapies that rely on biotechnology. For that, you have to appeal to investors’ self-interest—which is why the bulk of medical research is funded not by charities or even tax-payers but by private companies and individuals.
The fact that biotech research depends on patents generates profound hostility. The opposition to the patenting of genetic sequences, cells, tissues and clones—critics call it "the privatization of nature"—takes many forms, from a Luddite desire to stop scientific research to a genuine, if mistaken, conviction that common ownership is always morally preferable to private property. But all of the objections have a single root. the sense that it must be wrong to make money out of the constituents of the human body. They cannot be "owned" by any individual, because they belong to everyone. There cannot be "property in people".
That is a profound mistake. The truth is rather the opposite: there is only property in things because there is property in people. People own their own bodies, and that ownership is the basis of their property rights (and most other individual rights, come to that). The problem with the law as it stands is that it doesn’t sufficiently recognize an individual’s property rights over his or her own body, and his or her entitlement to make money out of it.
The outcome of a lawsuit in the US nearly 10 years ago defined the de facto rules governing the ownership of human tissues, and the financial exploitation of the discoveries that derive from them. In Moorev the Regents of UCLA the issue was whether an individual was entitled to a share of the profits that a biotech company made from developing drugs or treatments derived from cells that came from his body. Dr David Golde had discovered that John Moore, one of his patients, had a pancreas whose cells had some unusual properties that might be helpful in treating a form of cancer. In his laboratory, Golde developed what his called a "cell line" from Moore’s cells and patented it. When Moore found out, he sued Dr Golde for a share of whatever profits the cell line generated.
Mr. Moore lost. The court said he had no right to any of those profits, because he did not own the cells removed from his body. Moreover, the court held that since "research on human cells plays a critical role in medical research", granting property rights to the patient from whom the cells came threatened to "hinder research by restricting access to the raw materials".
In essence, that decision said that biotech companies could own and make money out of human cells and tissue—but the person from whom that tissue or cells came could not. The logic behind that decision is bizarre. No one except the most unreconstructed communist disputes that I own my own body. Indeed, it is only because I own my body that I can come to own anything else independent of it, mixing my labor with something being the most fundamental means by which I can come to own it. If cells from Mr. Moore’s body are his property, how can anyone else come to own them—unless he sells or gives those cells to them? (778 words)
Why does the author mention the Stanford scientists in the second paragraph?
选项
A、To compare hard work done by Roslin Institute to that of the two Stanford scientists.
B、To prove that scientific research can make money be the patent.
C、To suggest that why Geron-Roslin is keen to get its patent.
D、To underline that Geron company is money-oriented.
答案
C
解析
作者在此段中引入斯坦福大学两名教授的例子,是想说明一项专利技术可以赢得很多的利润,这就是为什么Greon-Roslin公司那么迫切地申请专利权了。斯坦福大学的两位教授申请技术专利后的17年中赚了8千万英磅。见第二段原文。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uAlO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Fromthefirstparagraph,wegettheimpressionthat______.WhichofthefollowingadjectivesdoesNOTdescribeRay’shometown
WhenthebookreviewerdiscussestheInternetUniversity,______.Accordingtothereview,whatisthefundamentalmissionoft
Accordingtothenews,whatmakesthiscreditcarddifferentfromconventionalonesis______.
Accordingtothepassage,devolutionwasmainlymeantto______.Theword"centrifugal"inthesecondparagraphmeans______.
ThethirdparagraphexaminesAmerica’sfuture-mindednessfromthe______perspective.Theword"pooh-pooh"inthesixthparagr
Thephrase"chippedawayat"inthefirstparagraphprobablymeansInnovationsinpostalservicesmightappearwhen
Alotofpeoplebelievethattelevisionhasaharmfuleffectonchildren.Afewyearsago,thesamecriticismsweremadeofthe
Thebizarreanticsofsleepwalkershavepuzzledpolice,perplexedscientists,andfascinatedwritersforcenturies.Thereisan
A、providedbyterroristsB、stolenfromthemilitaryC、madeaccordingtothemethodsshowninInternetD、madeinhislabC
A、America.B、Australia.C、Asia.D、Europe.C
随机试题
蛋白质变性主要的变化是什么
细胞因子是
以下有关“影响新生儿经皮吸收的因素”的叙述中,不正确的是
某孕妇,妊娠53天少量阴道流血,诊断为"先兆流产",使用药物"黄体酮"保胎,其作用是运用孕激素功能中的
住宅日照标准:老年人居住建筑不应低于冬至日日照()的标准;旧区改建的项目内新建住宅日照标准可酌情降低,但不应低于大寒日日照()的标准。
相互作用论的代表人物是()。
在五四运动至新中国成立前这一时期,中国社会存在的反动势力是()。
Tomsearchedhispocketslookingforthekeys.
"Thedoortohisroomisalwaysshut"suggeststhattheson______.WhattroublesTinaandMarkmostisthat______.
Theoldestandsimplestmethod,then,ofdescribingdifferencesinpersonalitywasto【B1】______peopleaccordingto【B2】______.
最新回复
(
0
)