首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
admin
2010-07-19
52
问题
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the sheep. The patent, if granted, would apply to "nuclear transfer technology" in both human and animal cells. One point of the patent is to help fund research into cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cancer and heart failure.
Its other aim is to make some money. Last May, the Roslin Institute was taken over by Geron, an American biotech company. Geron has committed $32.5 million to research at the Roslin. It wants to get its money back. Two scientists from Stanford who developed the use of restriction enzymes, one of the fundamental techniques in biotechnology, made about pounds 80 million out of it in the 17 years before the patent expired. So you can see why Geron-Roslin is so keen to get its patent. There’s nothing wrong with that. Without the prospect of a return at the end of investment, no one would ever lend money to anyone involved in bio-medical research—and given the huge sums now required to develop a new drug, or a new diagnostic test for some medical condition, that would mean there wouldn’t be any research. It is wonderful when people give money to worthwhile causes with no hope of personal gain. But appealing to altruism simply won’t raise the billions required to develop and market drugs and therapies that rely on biotechnology. For that, you have to appeal to investors’ self-interest—which is why the bulk of medical research is funded not by charities or even tax-payers but by private companies and individuals.
The fact that biotech research depends on patents generates profound hostility. The opposition to the patenting of genetic sequences, cells, tissues and clones—critics call it "the privatization of nature"—takes many forms, from a Luddite desire to stop scientific research to a genuine, if mistaken, conviction that common ownership is always morally preferable to private property. But all of the objections have a single root. the sense that it must be wrong to make money out of the constituents of the human body. They cannot be "owned" by any individual, because they belong to everyone. There cannot be "property in people".
That is a profound mistake. The truth is rather the opposite: there is only property in things because there is property in people. People own their own bodies, and that ownership is the basis of their property rights (and most other individual rights, come to that). The problem with the law as it stands is that it doesn’t sufficiently recognize an individual’s property rights over his or her own body, and his or her entitlement to make money out of it.
The outcome of a lawsuit in the US nearly 10 years ago defined the de facto rules governing the ownership of human tissues, and the financial exploitation of the discoveries that derive from them. In Moorev the Regents of UCLA the issue was whether an individual was entitled to a share of the profits that a biotech company made from developing drugs or treatments derived from cells that came from his body. Dr David Golde had discovered that John Moore, one of his patients, had a pancreas whose cells had some unusual properties that might be helpful in treating a form of cancer. In his laboratory, Golde developed what his called a "cell line" from Moore’s cells and patented it. When Moore found out, he sued Dr Golde for a share of whatever profits the cell line generated.
Mr. Moore lost. The court said he had no right to any of those profits, because he did not own the cells removed from his body. Moreover, the court held that since "research on human cells plays a critical role in medical research", granting property rights to the patient from whom the cells came threatened to "hinder research by restricting access to the raw materials".
In essence, that decision said that biotech companies could own and make money out of human cells and tissue—but the person from whom that tissue or cells came could not. The logic behind that decision is bizarre. No one except the most unreconstructed communist disputes that I own my own body. Indeed, it is only because I own my body that I can come to own anything else independent of it, mixing my labor with something being the most fundamental means by which I can come to own it. If cells from Mr. Moore’s body are his property, how can anyone else come to own them—unless he sells or gives those cells to them? (778 words)
Why does the author mention the Stanford scientists in the second paragraph?
选项
A、To compare hard work done by Roslin Institute to that of the two Stanford scientists.
B、To prove that scientific research can make money be the patent.
C、To suggest that why Geron-Roslin is keen to get its patent.
D、To underline that Geron company is money-oriented.
答案
C
解析
作者在此段中引入斯坦福大学两名教授的例子,是想说明一项专利技术可以赢得很多的利润,这就是为什么Greon-Roslin公司那么迫切地申请专利权了。斯坦福大学的两位教授申请技术专利后的17年中赚了8千万英磅。见第二段原文。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uAlO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThethirdparagraphexaminesAmerica’sfuture-mindednessfromthe______perspective.Accordingtothepassage,whichofthef
"Leavehimalone!"IyelledasIwalkedoutoftheorphanagegateandsawseveraloftheSpringParkSchoolbulliespushingthe
WhosenameisusedtocallNewWorld"America"?
ThePhilippinegovernmenthasbanned
Chileisdisadvantagedinthepromotionofitstourismby______.Accordingtothepassage,inWHICIIareaimprovementisalrea
Accordingtothepassage,universitieslikeHarvardshould______.The"paradoxes"inthepassagemean______.
Women’seducationintheMiddleAgeswasintendedtomakethemintogoodChristians,butintheRenaissancetheideawasto____
Scobielikedtohavehistelescopeinbedbecause______.EverymorningScobie______.
Themostimportantroleforgovernmentincreatingtheconditionsforcommercialinnovationistosupportuniversitiesintheir
1 ConsidertheseresultsfromastudyreleasedlastweekbytheManhattanInstitute,aNewYork-basedthinktank:Two-thirdsof
随机试题
下列说法错误的是:()
对于【】,应当从轻、减轻处罚或者免除处罚。
A.侧柏叶B.仙鹤草C.白及D.三七E.炮姜只有凉血止血功效的药物是
根据我国法律的规定,下列中哪些法律行为不得附条件,()。
航线弯曲度不得大于()。
背景某市大学城园区新建音乐学院教学楼,其中中庭主演播大厅层高5.4m,双向跨度19.8m,设计采用现浇混凝土井字梁。施工过程中发生如下事件:事件一:模架支撑方案经施工单位技术负责人审批后报监理签字,监理工程师认为其支撑高度超过5m,需进行专家论证。事
下列选项中不可以和解与调解的是()。
Iusedtoliveselfishly,Ishouldadmit.Butonemomentchangedme.Iwasonmylunchbreakandhad【C1】______theofficeto
波斯纳提出了一个教师成长的公式来概括教师成长的过程中的主要关系,即:教师成长=经验+反思。()
良好的生态环境,是最公平的公共产品,是最________的民生福祉。当前,我国资源约束________,环境污染严重,生态系统退化的问题十分严峻,人民群众对清新空气、干净饮水、安全食品、优美环境的要求越来越强烈。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是(
最新回复
(
0
)