首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2010-02-17
102
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about I millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
细节理解题。答案在第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病,淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,从而说明电和致癌有一定的难以确定的关系。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uE9K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Sometrytoreasonwiththepoliceofficerwhohaspulledthemoverforsomerealorimaginedtrafficoffense.Butwhenlawenfo
Thedestructionofournaturalresourcesandcontaminationofourfoodsupplycontinuetooccur,largelybecauseoftheextreme
Allpeoplehavesomeabilitytomanagetheirhealthandthehealthofthosetheycarefor.Meanwhile,withtheincreasingcomple
Theratiooftheworkdonebythemachine______theworkdoneonitiscalledtheefficiencyofthemachine.
Ourshasbecomeasocietyofemployees.AhundredyearsorsoagoonlyoneoutofeveryfiveAmericansatworkwasemployed,i.
Togetachocolateoutofaboxdemandsaconsiderableamountofunpacking:theboxhastobetakenoutofitspaperbag;thepl
Generallyspeaking,aBritishiswidelyregardedasaquiet,shyandconservativepersonwhois【C1】______onlyamongthosewith
Archaeologyhaslongbeenanacceptedtoolforstudyingprehistoriccultures.Relativelyrecentlythesametechniqueshavebeen
Therailroads【C1】______akeyroleinthesettlementoftheWest.Theyprovidedrelativelyeasy【C2】______totheregionforthe
随机试题
HCV最主要的传播途径是消化道。()
影响外环境的因素有()
急性肠梗阻手术的目的是
A、高良姜B、吴茱萸C、肉桂D、干姜E、附子被称为治中寒肝逆或寒郁肝脉诸痛之要药的中药是
某商业银行金融理财师张浩确信机构内部有人从事与理财相关的非法活动,已向主管报告,但所在机构并未采取补救措施。作为金融理财师,这时张浩应该向()举报。这一行为遵循的是《金融理财师职业道德准则》中的()基本原则。
成功的管理者需要建立起榜样权和专家权。关于榜样权和专家权,下列表述中正确的是()。(2014年)
为了吸引老人加入社区的老年合唱团,社区工作者可以从唱歌有益于身心健康的个人利益角度来邀请老人参加合唱团,这属于从()方面吸引群众加入社区团体和组织。
下列有关生活中的用药常识,说法正确的是:
《中华人民共和国继承法》第16条第2款规定:“公民可以立遗嘱将个人财产指定由法定继承人的一人或者数人继承。”从法的规范作用看,该项规定属于下列哪一情况?()
Intheopeningparagraph,theauthorintroduceshistopicby______.Femalecapuchinmonkeyswerechosenfortheresearchmost
最新回复
(
0
)