首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It was a day that Michael Eisner would undoubtedly like to forget. Sitting in a Los Angeles witness box for four hours last week
It was a day that Michael Eisner would undoubtedly like to forget. Sitting in a Los Angeles witness box for four hours last week
admin
2011-02-11
56
问题
It was a day that Michael Eisner would undoubtedly like to forget. Sitting in a Los Angeles witness box for four hours last week, the usually unflappable chairman of the Walt Disney Co. struggled to maintain his composure. Eisner’ s protégé turned nemesis. Jeffrey Katzenberg, his former employee, was seeking $500 million in his breach-of-contract suit against Disney, and Eisner was trying to defend his--and his company’ s integrity. At one point Eisner became flustered when Katzenberg’ s attorney, Bertram Fields, asked if he recalled telling his biographer, Tony Schwartz," I think I hate the little midget." Later Eisner recalled that the same day, he had received a fax from Katzenberg meant for Fields, thanking the lawyer for "managing" a magazine story that praised Katzenberg at Eisner’ s expense: "I said to Schwartz, ’Screw that. If he is going to play this disingenuous game... I simply was not going to pay him his money.’"
Last week’ s revelations were the latest twist in a dispute that has entertained Hollywood and tarnished Disney’ s corporate image. The dash began five years ago, when Katzenberg quit Disney after a 10-year reign as studio chief, during which he oversaw production of such animated blockbusters as "The Lion King". Disney’ s attorneys said that Katzenberg forfeited his bonus—2 percent of profits in perpetuity from all Disney movies, TV shows and stage productions from 1984 to 1994, as well as their sequels and tie-ins--when he left. The company ultimately paid Katzenberg a partial settlement of nearly $117 million, sources say. But talks broke down over how much Disney owed, and the dispute landed in com.
Industry insiders never expected that Disney would push it this far. The last Hollywood accounting dispute that aired in public was Art Buchwalds’ lawsuit against Paramount for profits he claimed to be owed from the 1988 Eddie Murphy hit "Coming to America". Paramount chose to fight Buchwald in court—only to wind up paying him $l million after embarrassing revelations about its business practices. After that, studios made a practice of quietly settling such claims. But Disney under Eisner would rather fight that settle. And he and Katzenberg are both proud, combative types whose business disagreement deepened into personal animus,
So far, Disney’ s image—as well as Eisner’ s—has taken a beating. In his testimony last week Eisner repeatedly responded to questions by saying "I don’ t recall" or "I don’ t know". Katzenberg, by contrast, offered a stack of notes and memos that appeared to bolster his claim. (The Disney executive who negotiated Katzenberg’ s deal, Frank Wells, died in a helicopter crash five years ago.)
The trial has also offered a devastating glimpse into the Magic Kingdom’ s business dealings. Internal documents detail sensitive Disney financial information. One Hollywood lawyer calls a memo sent to Katzenberg from a former Disney top accountant "a road map to riches" for writers, directors and producers eager to press cases against Disney. The company declined requests to comment on the case. The next phase of the trial could be even more embarrassing. As Katzenberg’s profit participation is calculated, Eisner will have to argue that his animated treasures are far less valuable than Katzenberg claims. No matter how the judge rules, Disney will look like a loser.
It is implied in the last paragraph that______.
选项
A、Disney has profited much less than the general public expected
B、Disney has underpaid many of their employees
C、Eisner’ s animated movies didn’t bring as much money as Katzenberg thinks
D、Disney is undergoing a financial crisis
答案
B
解析
细节推断题。根据最后一段“One Hollywood lawyer calls a memo sent to Katzenberg from a former Disney top accountant“a road map to riches”for writers,directors and producers eager to press cases against Disney.”可以推断想找迪斯尼打官司的人还很多,因此B为正确答案。A。C是对“As Katzenberg’s profit participation is calculated,Eisner will have to argue that his animated treasures are far less valuable than Katzenberg claims.”这句话的错误理解,这句话是为了说明Eisner所处的尴尬境地,即迪斯尼财务细目公开后,他将无法自圆其说。D显然是错误的,迪斯尼没有出现财政危机。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uEYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Weallknowthatprogramminglanguageisthesystemofsyntax,grammar,andsymbolsorwordsusedtogiveinstructionstoacomp
Ifambitionistobewellregarded,therewardsofambition--wealth,distinction,controloverone’sdestiny--mustbedeemedwor
Mostpeoplecanrememberaphonenumberforuptothirtyseconds.Whenthisshortamountoftimeelapses,however,thenumbersa
Crimehasitsowncycles,amagazinere-portedsomeyearsbefore.Policerecordsthat【M1】______.werestudiedforfiveyearso
FoodandFitness:theAmericanObsessionAmericansseemtobealwaysinahurry,whichhasbecomeone【1】【1】__________
ThomasJefferson,whodiedin1826,loomseverlargerasafigureofspecialsignificance.Americans,ofcourse,arefamiliarwi
A、Al-Qaida.B、Amilitantgroup.C、TheMuslimBrotherhood.D、Agroupofseparatists.B
Anoutstandingexampleofhardwiredcapabilitieswithgreatflexibilityforprogrammingbyusislanguage.Specialistsagreetha
A、keepingthepeaceB、helpinginthefightagainstcancerandAIDSC、helpingwithelectionsinmanycountriesD、bringingrelief
"Peopleworkmoreproductivelyinteamsthanindividually.Teamworkrequirescooperation,whichmotivatespeoplemuchmorethan
随机试题
精加工时,限制进给量提高的主要因素是()。
写出上面两节诗的比兴句及其比兴意义。这两节诗在内容上构成什么关系?
A、不得检出致病菌B、HBs阴性,不得检出致病菌C、细菌总数<100个/ml,大肠杆菌<3个/1000mlD、细菌菌落总数≤100cfu/ml,不得检出致病微生物E、细菌菌落总数≤5cfu/cm2,HBs阴性,未检出大肠杆菌及其他致病菌消毒后卫
关于Ⅱb型高脂血症的描述,错误的是
女25岁,扁桃体炎,注射青霉素后1分钟,呼吸急促、紫绀,心率130次/分,血压65/40mmHg,抢救药物是
A.劣药B.假药C.保健药品D.非处方用药E.特殊药品药品所含成分的名称与国家药品标准或者省、自治区、直辖市药品标准规定不符合的是()
心室肌细胞动作电位的2期复极形成与下列哪个因素有关
生产经营单位有()行为之一的,责令限期改正,可以处五万元以下的罚款;逾期未改正的,责令停产停业整顿,并处五万元以上十万元以下的罚款,对其直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员处一万元以上二万元以下的罚款。
下列关于封闭式基金募集、交易的陈述,不正确的是()。
A、Suethegovernment.B、Suetheindividual.C、Closedownthecompany.D、Sentencetheindividualtodeath.B短文谈到,任何人不付钱就使用某种专利,该专
最新回复
(
0
)