2. 考研
  3. The Importance of American Business Information Protection It never rains but it pours, Just as bosses and boards have final

The Importance of American Business Information Protection It never rains but it pours, Just as bosses and boards have final

admin2013-06-05  37
问题             The Importance of American Business Information Protection
    It never rains but it pours, Just as bosses and boards have finally sorted out their worst accounting and compliance troubles, and improved their feeble corporation governance, a new problem threatens to earn them—especially in America—the sort of nasty headlines that inevitably lead to heads rolling in the executive suite: data insecurity. Left, until now, to odd, low level IT staff to put right, and seen as a concern only of data-rich industries such as banking, telecoms and air travel, information protection is now high on the boss’s agenda in businesses of every variety.
    Several massive leakages of customer and employee data this year—from organizations as diverse as Time Warner, the American defense contractor Science Applications International Corp and even the University of California, Berkeley—have left managers hurriedly peering into their intricate IT systems and business processes in search of potential vulnerabilities.
    "Data is becoming an asset which needs to be guarded as much as any other asset," says Haim Mendelson of Stanford University’s business school. "The ability to guard customer data is the key to market value, which the board is responsible for on behalf of shareholders." Indeed, just as there is the concept of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), perhaps it is time for GASP, Generally Accepted Security Practices, suggested Eli Noam of New York’s Columbia Business School. "Setting the proper investment level for security, redundancy , and recovery is a management issue, not a technical one," he says.
    The mystery is that this should come as a surprise to any boss. Surely it should be obvious to the dim most executive that trust, that most valuable of economic assets, is easily destroyed and hugely expensive to restore—and that few things are more likely to destroy trust than a company letting sensitive personal data get into the wrong hands.
    The current state affairs may have been encouraged—though not justified—by the lack of legal penalty (in America, but not Europe) for data leakage. Until California recently passed a law, American firms did not have to tell anyone, even the victim, when data went astray. That may change fast; lots of proposed data-security legislation is now doing the rounds in Washington, D. C. Meanwhile, the theft of information about some 40 million credit-card accounts in America, disclosed on June 17th, overshadowed a hugely important decision a day earlier by America’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC), that puts corporate America on notice that regulators will act if firms fail to provide adequate data security.
According to Para. 2, some organizations check their systems to find out______.
选项 A、whether there is any weak point
B、what sort of data has been stolen
C、who is responsible for the leakage
D、how the potential spies can be located
答案A
解析 事实细节题。解答本题的关键是第二段末句的in search of potential vulnerabilities。A中的weak point是对vulnerabilities的同义转述，故为答案。第二段为一个复杂句。它首先列举几个大的知名公司都遭到资料泄密事件来说明问题的严重性，然后在本段的最后提及问题的关键所在：公司的资料可能存在安全隐患。这里没有提到调查何种资料丢失，也没有提到谁负安全责任，更没有涉及间谍问题，故排除B“何种类型的资料已经被盗”、C“谁应该为资料泄露负责”和D“如何发现间谍嫌疑人”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uVd4777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)