首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2013-12-06
39
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very longwave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans".
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that electromagnetic fields present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner
答案
D
解析
文章一开始就提出了“电会致癌吗?”这个问题。十多年来,一大批科学家和新闻界人士都指出:研究结果似乎表示:接触电磁场可能会增加患白血病和其他恶性肿瘤的危险性。所以说到目前为止还难以确定电力对健康的影响究竟是理性的,还是杞人忧天。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ucU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
下列有关球后溃疡的描述,正确的有
A、Thebuyingoflifeinsuranceisnotthebusinessofguessing.B、Theremustbeastandardamountoflifeinsuranceforpeople.
Thetruthmaywellbeself-evidentthatallhumansarecreatedequal,butonethingourMakerdidnotendowuswithequallyist
Ifyouarecaughtinadownpour,itisbettertorunforshelterthanwalk,researchersintheUSadvise.Thismaysoundobvious
OneofthemostnoticeablefeaturesofU.S.societyisthediversityofitspeople.
Therearemanydoctorswhohaveendeavoredtoincreasethe______oftheirbehaviorasmedicalprofessionals.
ItissaidthatinEnglanddeathispressing,inCanadainevitableandinCaliforniaoptional.Smallwonder.Americans’lifeexp
A、Thehealthbenefitsofexerciseareyettobeproved.B、Thehealthbenefitsofexercisearetobefurtherstudied.C、Thehealt
Theinjectionthatthegirlhadbeengivenwasbeginningtowork.Herhead【C1】______heavy,andshewasverysleepy.Oncesheope
Istheprofessionofmedicineinretreat?I’mremindedofthiswithSeptemberwelcominganewinflux(流入)ofmedicalstudents.A
随机试题
幽门梗阻可导致()
A.3天B.3~7天C.14天D.半年半年内重新尿路感染2次以上,治疗时疗程一般为
二级预防主要指()
A.麝香B.苏合香C.樟脑D.石菖蒲E.冰片不论寒闭、热闭均可使用的药物是
建设项目竣工环境保护验收时,高速公路噪声监测应在公路两侧距路肩小于或等于200m范围内选取至少( )有代表性的噪声敏感区域,分别设点进行监测。
甲建筑公司与乙房地产开发公司签订了一份建设工程承包合同,合同规定由甲公司预先垫付20%的工程款,但没有约定利息的计算方法,若甲、乙公司就工程款支付发生争议,甲公司起诉至人民法院,要求乙公司支付工程款并偿还垫付工程款的利息,人民法院应()。
转股价格应不低于募集说明公告日前______个交易日公司股票交易均价和前______个交易日的均价。( )
应收账款投资是一项风险投资,具体表现在()。
简述独立需求与相关需求的特征。
我国是世界上缺水严重的国家之一,解决水资源不足的主要措施有()。
最新回复
(
0
)