首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2013-12-06
30
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very longwave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans".
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that electromagnetic fields present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner
答案
D
解析
文章一开始就提出了“电会致癌吗?”这个问题。十多年来,一大批科学家和新闻界人士都指出:研究结果似乎表示:接触电磁场可能会增加患白血病和其他恶性肿瘤的危险性。所以说到目前为止还难以确定电力对健康的影响究竟是理性的,还是杞人忧天。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ucU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
关于糖尿病酮症酸中毒钾代谢紊乱的描述中,正确的有
以下哪些情况提示有肺结核病情活动
Severalclassesofbittercitruscompoundhavelookedpromisingasanticanceragentsinlaboratorytests.Anewstudyindicates
A、Itisfunthoughnotwidelypracticed.B、Itistobenefityourdependents.C、Itisgettingpopular.D、Itisabsurd.B录音中讲到购买寿险
A、It’soverrated.B、It’sratherboring.C、It’shardtounderstand.D、It’sextremelyinteresting.D女士表示自己从未看过这样有趣的科幻故事,男士讲女士这
Iworkedtodeveloptherequisiteskillforamanagerial.
Themostinterestingarchitecturalphenomenonofthe1970’swastheenthusiasmforrefurbishingoldbuildings.Obviously,thisw
Thebestexerciseshouldrequirecontinuous______,ratherthanfrequentstopsandstarts.
Archaeologycantellusplentyabouthowhumanslookedandthewaytheylivedtensofthousandsofyearsago.Butwhataboutthe
随机试题
A.午后热甚B.口干舌燥C.头胀身重D.小便不利上焦病证的临床表现,多见
下列哪项不属于门静脉高压的侧支循环
某工程施工现场狭窄,施工过程中,由于承包人塔吊安装中存在缺陷,导致使用过程中发生塔吊倒塌事故,砸坏项目周边一幢建筑物的屋面。该事故造成的损失,应由()。
防排烟系统每月的检查内容包括()。
根据下面材料回答问题。截至2011年年末,T市城镇职工基本医疗保险参保人员474.52万人,城乡居民基本医疗保险参保人员498.30万人,城镇职工基本养老保险参保人员458.70万人,城乡居民基本养老保险参保人员97.80万人,失业保险参保职工2
2001年全国人大常委会作出解释:《刑法》第410条规定的“非法批准征收、征用、占用土地”,是指非法批准征收、征用、占用耕地、林地等农用地以及其他土地。对该法律解释,下列哪些理解是正确的?()
Youwanttoapplyforthefollowingjob.WritealettertoMrMooredescribingyourpreviousexperienceandexplainingwhyy
Whenglobalwarmingfinallycame,itstuckwithavengeance(异乎寻常地).Insomeregions,temperaturesroseseveraldegreesinless
Internationalairlineshaverediscoveredthebusinesstravelers,themanorwomanwhoregularlyjetsfromcountrytocountryas
AnewstudysaysmanyyoungpeopleintheUnitedStatestakesubstancesthatareclaimedtomakepeople【B1】______sportsbetter.
最新回复
(
0
)