首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swep
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swep
admin
2018-09-19
32
问题
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swept aside by the mechanical loom. Over the past 30 years the digital revolution has displaced many of the mid-skill jobs that underpinned 20th-century middle-class life. Typists, ticket agents, bank tellers and many production-line jobs have been dispensed with, just as the weavers were.
(2)For those who believe that technological progress has made the world a better place, such churn is a natural part of rising prosperity. Although innovation kills some jobs, it creates new and better ones, as a more productive society becomes richer and its wealthier inhabitants demand more goods and services. Optimism remains the right starting-point, but for workers the dislocating effects of technology may make themselves evident faster than its benefits. Even if new jobs and wonderful products emerge, in the short term income gaps will widen, causing huge social dislocation and perhaps even changing politics.
(3)Why be worried? It is partly just a matter of history repeating itself. In the early part of the Industrial Revolution the rewards of increasing productivity went disproportionately to capital: later on, labor reaped most of the benefits. The pattern today is similar. The prosperity unleashed by the digital revolution has gone overwhelmingly to the owners of capital and the highest-skilled workers. Over the past three decades, labor’s share of output has shrunk globally from 64% to 59%. Meanwhile, the share of income going to the top 1% in America has risen from around 9% in the 1970s to 22% today. Unemployment is at alarming levels in much of the rich world, and not just for cyclical reasons. Fifteen years ago, 65% of working-age Americans were in work: since then the proportion has fallen, during good years as well as bad, to the current level of 59%.
(4)Worse, it seems likely that this wave of technological disruption to the job market has only just started. From driverless cars to clever household gadgets, innovations that already exist could destroy swathes of jobs that have hitherto been untouched. The public sector is one obvious target: it has proved singularly resistant to tech-driven reinvention. But the step change in what computers can do will have a powerful effect on middle-class jobs in the private sector too.
(5)Until now the jobs most vulnerable to machines were those that involved routine, repetitive tasks. But thanks to the exponential rise in processing power and the ubiquity of digitised information ("big data"), computers are increasingly able to perform complicated tasks more cheaply and effectively than people. Clever industrial robots can quickly "learn" a set of human actions. Services may be even more vulnerable. Computers can already detect intruders in a closed-circuit camera picture more reliably than a human can. By comparing reams of financial or biometric data, they can often diagnose fraud or illness more accurately than any number of accountants or doctors.
(6)At the same time, the digital revolution is transforming the process of innovation itself. Thanks to off-the-shelf code from the internet and platforms that host services (such as Amazon’s cloud computing), provide distribution (Apple’s app store)and offer marketing (Facebook), the number of digital startups has exploded. Just as computer-games designers invented a product that humanity never knew it needed but now cannot do without, so these firms will no doubt dream up new goods and services to employ millions. But for now they are singularly light on workers. When Instagram, a popular photo-sharing site, was sold to Facebook for about $1 billion in 2012, it had 30 million customers and employed 13 people. Kodak, which filed for bankruptcy a few months earlier, employed 145,000 people in its heyday.
(7)The problem is one of timing as much as anything. Google now employs 46,000 people. But it takes years for new industries to grow, whereas the disruption a startup causes to incumbents is felt sooner. Airbnb may turn homeowners with spare rooms into entrepreneurs, but it poses a direct threat to the lower end of the hotel business—a massive employer.
(8)If this analysis is halfway correct, the social effects will be huge. Many of the jobs most at risk are lower down the ladder (logistics, haulage), whereas the skills that are least vulnerable to automation (creativity, managerial expertise)tend to be higher up, so median wages are likely to remain stagnant for some time and income gaps are likely to widen.
(9)Anger about rising inequality is bound to grow, but politicians will find it hard to address the problem. Shunning progress would be as futile now as the Luddites’ protests against mechanised looms were in the 1810s, because any country that tried to stop would be left behind by competitors eager to embrace new technology. The freedom to raise taxes on the rich to punitive levels will be similarly constrained by the mobility of capital and highly skilled labour.
(10)The main way in which governments can help their people through this dislocation is through education systems. One of the reasons for the improvement in workers’ fortunes in the latter part of the Industrial Revolution was because schools were built to educate them—a dramatic change at the time. Now those schools themselves need to be changed, to foster the creativity that humans will need to set them a-part from computers. There should be less rote-learning and more critical thinking. Technology itself will help, whether through MOOCs (massive open online courses)or even video games that simulate the skills needed for work.
(11)Yet however well people are taught, their abilities will remain unequal, and in a world which is increasingly polarised economically, many will find their job prospects dimmed and wages squeezed. The best way of helping them is not, as many on the left seem to think, to push up minimum wages. Jacking up the floor too far would accelerate the shift from human workers to computers. Better to top up low wages with public money so that anyone who works has a reasonable income, through a bold expansion of the tax credits that countries such as America and Britain use.
(12)Innovation has brought great benefits to humanity. Nobody in their right mind would want to return to the world of handloom weavers. But the benefits of technological progress are unevenly distributed, especially in the early stages of each new wave, and it is up to governments to spread them. In the 19th century it took the threat of revolution to bring about progressive reforms. Today’s governments would do well to start making the changes needed before their people get angry.
The following are the potential effect of digital revolution EXCEPT that _____.
选项
A、the power of government will be undermined
B、the number of digital startups will rise dramatically
C、a great number of today’s jobs will be automated
D、the inequality in wealth distribution will be reinforced
答案
A
解析
题目问不属于数字革命带来的潜在影响,选项A“政府的权利将被削弱”没有原文依据,相关信息出段在第9段,但该段第2句只是提到政府可能难以解决这个问题,但并没有涉及政府权利,故答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uhEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Englishisoneoftheworld’smostwidelyspokenlanguages.ThisispartlybecauseitwasthelanguageoftheBritishEmpire.T
Americans’circleofcloseconfidantshasshrunkdramaticallyinthepasttwodecadesbutthenumberofpeoplewhosaythey【M1】_
Despitealloftheadvancesinmedicine,healthcareprovidershaveneverbeenonthecuttingedgeofnewbusinessandmarketin
ForgetexpensiveeducationalDVDsandprivatetutors,thesecrettosmartchildrencouldbesosimpleasgivingbirth【M1】______
Thebrainsofchildrenareaffectedbyfamilyviolenceinthesamewayascombataffectssoldiers,accordingtoastudy.Inbot
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsaferbehavior,suchasagreeingnottogetdrunk(23per
Thelasttwotornadoseasonshavebeenthedeadliestinadecade,with206deaths.EveryonefromtheinsuranceindustrytoAlG
PASSAGETWOWhatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsvanishinglanguagesthroughouttheworld?
A、Tuitionfees.B、Foodandlodging.C、Inheritances.D、Housing.C根据句(6—1)和句(6—2)可知,在被问及再婚对成年的孩子有何影响时,Jean建议再婚前一定要考虑遗产继承的问题,否则你的孩子
我的藏书都像是我的朋友,而且是密友。我虽然对它们并不是每一本都认识,它们中的每一本却都认识我。我每一走进我的书斋,书籍们立即活跃起来,我仿佛能听到它们向我问好的声音,我仿佛能看到它们向我招手的情景,倘若有人闯我,书籍的嘴在什么地方?而手又在什么地方呢?我只
随机试题
当前在人群中引起暴发或流行的流感病毒主要有哪些
关于流行性脑脊髓膜炎的流行情况以下描述不正确的是
期货公司的交易软件、结算软件供应商有下列()行为的,责令改正,处3万元以上10万元以下的罚款。对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员给予警告,并处1元以上5万元以下的罚款。
下列各项中,会导致所有者权益总额减少的事项有()。
颐和园是目前世界上规模最大、保存最完整、文化价值最高的一座皇家园林博物馆。()
在过去的两年中,有5架F717飞机坠毁。针对F717存在设计问题的说法,该飞机制造商反驳说:调查表明,每一次事故都是由于飞行员操作失误造成的。飞机制造商的上述反驳基于以下哪一项假设?
近年来浙江省商品交易市场呈现稳步发展态势。2009年,浙江省共有亿元以上商品交易市场670家,比上年增加31家,营业面积2298万平方米,出租摊位39万个,实现成交额964.7亿元,比上年增长7.8%。从市场成交额看,成交额达10亿元以上的商品交
在SELECT语句中,如果要对输出的记录进行排序,应该使用______。
阅读程序:OptionBase1PrivateSubForm_Click()Dima(3)AsIntegerPrint“输入的数据是:”;Fori=1to3A(
表达式2*3^2+4*2/2+3^2的值是
最新回复
(
0
)