首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
admin
2017-04-20
58
问题
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved: in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted", in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S.—meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity, levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Orr for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French (or Turkish) every year.
Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. "You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. "You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs."
This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether "generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man (I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that" generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust; tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital"—networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild" social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital— old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
Which of the following statements about Scandinavians or Britons is INCORRECT?
选项
A、Scandinavians are generally frank and open.
B、Britons are reluctant to show hospitality.
C、Britons pretend to be shrewd.
D、Britons prefer satirical art.
答案
B
解析
细节题。第五段第二句指出,斯堪的纳维亚人或荷兰人乐于对他人表示信任友爱,并引以为豪。故[A]正确;第四段第四句指出,我们有强大的讽刺文化,吹毛求疵的媒体,不放过涉及私人、公众的任何一次欺骗背叛。故[D]正确;第五段末句指出,而我们英国人更喜欢撅撅嘴、摇摇头,假装精明机智。故[C]正确;文章没有提及[B],故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/utzK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
StrategiesforWritingaLiteratureReviewAliteraturereviewdiscussespublishedinformationinaparticularsubjectarea.
Educationistheprocessoflearningandknowing,whichisnotrestrictedtoourschooltext-books.Itisaholisticprocessan
Necessarymeditationsontheactual,includingthemeanbread-and-cheesequestion,dissipatedthephantasmalforawhile,andco
Unlikeanearthquake,ademographicdisasterdoesnotstrikewithoutwarning.Japan’spopulationof127mispredictedtofallto
Itisreportedthatacademicdishonestyhasbecomeendemicinalllevelsofeducation.Evensomefamousprofessorsandexpertsc
ThereasonswhywomenbossareunpopularincludeallofthefollowingEXCEPTthatpeoplethink______.
Thebestwaytodealwiththeannoyingco-workerscanbesummarizedas______.
Whoset(s)thepublicschoolcalendars?
Peoplearen’tsuggestedtogotoThailandrecentlybecauseofits______.
PASSAGETHREEWhydidthecoastguardcomeouttohelptheauthor?
随机试题
钢材应进行全数抽样复验的情况有()。
会计档案资料保管员的具体工作包括()。
甲公司有以下投资业务:(1)2015年3月25日,甲公司购入乙公司20万股股票,支付价款总额为175.52万元,其中包括支付的证券交易税费0.52万元和已宣告但尚未发放的现金股利4万元,甲公司将其划分为交易性金融资产。2015年4月10日,甲公司收到乙公
根据企业所得税法律制度的规定,非居民企业在中国境内设立机构、场所的,应当就其所设机构、场所取得的来源于中国境内的所得,以及发生在中国境外但与其所设机构、场所有实际联系的所得,缴纳企业所得税。()
某企业为增值税一般纳税人,本期购进商品一批,进货价格为100万元,增值税额为17万元,商品到达验收入库时发现短缺20%,其中合理损耗为5%,另15%尚待查明原因。则该商品的入帐价值应为()万元。
为研究裂翅基因在染色体上的分布情况,将裂翅果蝇进行杂交实验,结果如下图所示(裂翅(A)对非裂翅(a)为显性)。根据实验结果分析,这对等位基因的分布有两种可能:如果这对等位基因位于常染色体上,则父本的基因型为________,F1中的裂翅的基
()是教师最常用的研究方法。
在IPSec安全策略的规则中,身份验证方法可以是证书、Kerberos、预共享密钥。其中,()实现的IPSec安全级别最高,安全性最好。
市场上有Q-3脂肪酸的药物可以帮助提高注意力和记忆力,可是有人用过之后认为这种药物无任何改善效果。请你设计一个实验检验这种药物是否对记忆力和注意力有提高效果。请从研究题目、研究假设、实验设计、实验过程、实验分析等方面考虑。[华南师范大学2017]
Wefindthatbrightchildrenarerarelyheldbackbymixed-abilityteaching.Onthecontrary,boththeirknowledgeandexperienc
最新回复
(
0
)