2. 外语
  3. It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage universities to embrace the world of commerce. Critics pre

It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage universities to embrace the world of commerce. Critics pre

admin2015-07-31  53
问题     It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage universities to embrace the world of commerce. Critics predicted that the integrity of academic research would be compromised by patent-grubbing and attempts to build companies around the latest laboratory findings. But such fears did not come true, says a new report from the National Academies released Monday. The panel—chaired by Mark Wrighton, Chancellor of Washington University in St. Louis—examined a vast file of scholarly work on how universities have managed intellectual property in the wake of the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act and concluded that things are pretty much hunky-dory(极好的)right now. Or, as the report says:
    The Bayh-Dole legal framework and the practices of universities have not seriously undermined academic norms of uninhibited inquiry, open communication, or faculty advancement based on scholarly merit. There is little evidence that intellectual property considerations interfere with other important avenues of transferring research results to development and commercial use.
    At the same time, however, the Academies’ panel warns universities not to go overboard hunting for patents. While some universities have made millions of dollars by licensing discoveries from their labs, raising money should not be the main goal. Instead, the report says, universities should aim to disseminate(传播)technology as widely as possible for the public good. This may mean passing up the best-paying licensing deal and taking one that allows for broader use of the technology. For most schools, it adds, the likelihood of "raising significant revenue" from patents is small, the probability of disappointment is high, and the risk of "distorting and narrowing" the use of new knowledge is great.
    It’s important not to get carried away with racking up patents at the expense of the university’s primary obligation to disseminate new knowledge and technologies, says panel member David Korn, assistant provost(教务长)for research at Harvard University. A former dean of the Stanford University Medical School, Korn was involved in reviewing a set of high-minded guidelines for universities that were largely adopted by the panel. These "Nine Points to Consider in Licensing" were previously endorsed by the Association of University Technology Managers.
The phrase "racking up"(Line 1, Para. 4)means______.
选项 A、getting an amount of patents
B、trying hard to remember the patents
C、suffering the loss of the patents
D、neglecting the profits of the patents
答案A
解析 推理判断题。由定位句可知，大学不应该以放弃传播新知识技术的主要职责而只顾着——专利权，结合专利与维护公众利益、传播新知识技术的冲突可推断，此处应指“设法获取专利”，故A)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/v5l7777K
0

大学英语四级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)