首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
23
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced tn Britain.
C、In the adversarial system. it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
细节题。本题为细节比对题。A 与第三段说明的法国审判系统中证据使用书面形式的内容相符;B 与第二段第三、四句的意思一致C 与第一段最后一句中对两种审判形式的对比相符,只有D 曲解了第一段中对于英国律师的描述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vGDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Whichgame...issoldwell?【P1】______allowsgamerstoselectgameswithequal-caliberopponents?【P2】______isprobablyfright
Whichgame...issoldwell?【P1】______allowsgamerstoselectgameswithequal-caliberopponents?【P2】______isprobablyfright
Whichgame...issoldwell?【P1】______allowsgamerstoselectgameswithequal-caliberopponents?【P2】______isprobablyfright
Whatshouldonedoifhewantstoworkmoreefficientlyathislowpointinthemorning?
Whatshouldonedoifhewantstoworkmoreefficientlyathislowpointinthemorning?
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Emmagrewupinafamilywithasailingtradition.
YourfirmisplanningtoexportcarpetstoGreatBritain.AtarecentconferenceyoumetWilliamLinton,whoisamarketanalyst
Thepaintingwasprobablystolen______.TheforgerieswereproducedbythefollowingmethodsEXCEPT______.
Ifthepopulationoftheearthgoesonincreasingatitscurrentrate,therewilleventuallynotbeenoughresourcesleftto
随机试题
下列哪些激素可促进机体各组织蛋白质合成
下面哪些提到了岗位分工?()
会计准则对企业单位的会计工作起着重要的指导作用是()
某男,68岁,口干、口渴多饮五年。现症:小便频数量多,混浊如脂膏,腰膝酸软乏力,劳累后加重,伴头晕,皮肤干燥,缺少光泽,瘙痒,夜寐差,心烦多梦,时有盗汗,舌红,少苔,脉细数。若患者逐渐出现多食易饥,形体消瘦,大便干燥,舌苔黄,脉滑实有力者,治疗可用
某患者被马车从小腹压过,腰与骨盆区疼痛,休克,不能自行排尿,膀胱膨满,直肠指诊,指套上染有血迹。应采用的最主要的措施是
()是公司签发的证明股东所持股份的凭证。
(2015年)大华公司是上海证券交易所上市公司,总股本10亿元。公司董事长赵某通过自己控股的华星公司持有大华公司51%的股份。网商公司是一家有限责任公司,股东钱某持股90%、孙某持股10%。网商公司最近3年的净利润分别为2亿元、—1亿元、3000万元。
某些老师对于学生间的代做和抄袭作业行为睁一只眼、闭一只眼。甚至有的老师无奈地说:抄作业的学生总比不做作业的学生好,抄一遍也是一种学习呀。问题:根据材料,并结合伦理学的相关知识进行分析。(1)你怎样看待材料中这些老师的做法?请说明理由。(2)为防止上述
在Word编辑中,能调整行间距命令的菜单是()。A.“编辑”B.“视图”C.“格式”D.“工具”
下列数据结构中,属于非线性结构的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)