首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
26
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced tn Britain.
C、In the adversarial system. it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
细节题。本题为细节比对题。A 与第三段说明的法国审判系统中证据使用书面形式的内容相符;B 与第二段第三、四句的意思一致C 与第一段最后一句中对两种审判形式的对比相符,只有D 曲解了第一段中对于英国律师的描述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vGDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Supermarketshoppershaveneverbeenmorespoiltforchoice.Butjustwhenwethoughttraditionalsystemsofselectivefarmingh
Wherewastheletterprobablyplacedmanyyearsago?
Whichgame...issoldwell?【P1】______allowsgamerstoselectgameswithequal-caliberopponents?【P2】______isprobablyfright
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Emmagrewupinafamilywithasailingtradition.
Whatdoesthespeakersuggestthatthestudentsshoulddoduringtheterm?
Whatdowomen’sliberationgroupsinBritaindowithgraffiti?
Thepassengerswillhavea15-minute______stopatBloomington.
Thepassengerswillhavea15-minute______stopatBloomington.
随机试题
第二次鸦片战争到八国联军侵华战争期间西方列强迫使中国政府签订的不平等条约有________、________、________。
胃癌的治疗。
根据我国《选举法》规定,直接选举人大代表的行政区域有_________、__________、_________。
某女月经紊乱1年余,一般是O~40天/10~60天,量时多时少,妇科检查及B型超声波检查无异常,基础体温呈单相型,月经第1天子宫内膜检查呈增生期变化。其诊断是
抗压强度较高的铸铁不宜用作()。
流动比率反映的是()。
为了调查当前人们的识字水平,其实验者列举了20个词语,请30位文化人士识读,这些人的文化程度都在大专以上。识读结果显示,多数人只读对3到5个词语,极少数人读对15个以上,甚至有人全部读错。其中,“蹒跚”的辨识率最高,30人中有19人读对;“呱呱坠地”所有人
我国国有经济发挥的主导作用,主要体现在()
请在光标处插入一个单元格,并使活动单元格下移。
某注册会计师协会培训部的魏老师正在准备有关审计业务档案管理的培训课件,她的助手已搜集并整理了一份相关资料存放在Word文档“PPT素材.docx”中,按下列要求帮助魏老师完成PPT课件的整合制作:将标题为“七、业务档案的保管”所属的幻灯片拆分为3张,其
最新回复
(
0
)