首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
admin
2009-06-24
44
问题
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Between 1994 and 1997 in New York city violent crime fell by 39% in central Harlem and by 45% in the once-terrifying South Bronx. The latest figures released by the FBI, for 1997, show that serious crime continued to fall in all the largest cities, though a little more slowly than in 1996.
Violent crime fell by 5% in all, and by slightly more in cities with over 250,000 people. Property crimes have fallen, too, by more than 20% since 1980, so that the rates for burglary and car-theft are lower in America than they are in supposedly more law-abiding Britain and Scandinavia. And people have noticed. In 1994, 30% of Americans told pollsters that crime was the most important challenge facing the country. In 1997, only 15% thought so. Some cities’ police departments are so impressed by these figures, it is said, that they have lately taken to exaggerating the plunge in crime.
Why this has happened is anyone’s guess. Many factors—social, demographic, economic, and political—affect crime rate, so it is difficult to put a finger on the vital clue. In May this year, the FBI itself admitted it had "no idea" why rates were falling so fast.
Politicians think they know, of course. Ask Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York, why his city has made such strides in beating crime that it accounts for fully a quarter of the national decline. He will cite his policy of "zero tolerance". This concept, which sprang from a famous article by two criminologists in Atlantic Monthly in March 1982, maintains that by refusing to tolerate tiny infractions of the law—dropping litter, spray-painting walls—the authorities can create a climate in which crime of more dangerous kinds finds it impossible to flourish. The Atlantic article was called "Broken Windows"; if one window in a building was left broken, it argued, all the others would soon be gone. The answer: mend the window, fast.
The metro system in Washington D.C., was the first place where zero tolerance drew public attention, especially when one passenger was arrested for eating a banana. The policy seemed absurdly pernickety, yet it worked: in a better environment, people’s behavior improved, and crime dropped. Mr. Giuliani, taking this theme to heart, has gone further. He has cracked down on windscreen-cleaners, public urinators graffiti, and even jaywalkers. He has excoriated New York’s famously sullen cabdrivers, and wants all New Yorkers to be nicer to each other. Tony Blair, visiting from London, has been hugely impressed.
But is this cleanliness and civility the main reason why crime has fallen? It seems unlikely. "Zero tolerance" can also be a distraction, making too many policemen spend too much time handing out littering tickets and parking fines while, some streets away, young men are being murdered for their trainers. It is localized, too: though lower Manhattan or the Washington metro can show the uncanny orderliness of a communist regime, other parts of the city—the areas of highest crime maybe left largely untreated.
William Bratton, New York’s police commissioner until Mr. Giuliani fired him for stealing his thunder, has a different explanation for the fall in crime. It came about mainly, he believes, because he reorganized the police department and restored its morale: giving his officers better guns, letting them take more decisions for themselves, and moving them away from desk jobs and out into the streets. Mr. Bratton made his precinct commanders personally responsible for reducing crimes on their own beats. There was no passing the buck, and those who failed were fired. Within a year, he had replaced half of them.
选项
A、Its crime rates have been falling only in big cities.
B、Violent crime falls by 39%.
C、The rates for burglary and car-theft are lower in America than that in Britain.
D、Violent crime falls by more than 20%.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vNHd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
A.itsbenefitsB.theirchildhoodmemoriesC.theirstressD.moretrainingE.disciplineproblemsF.becauseofitslowpayThegov
WhichofthefollowingisNOTrequiredofacontainer?WhydidtheauthorgotoNewYorkCity?
Heissaidtobesufferingfromterminalcancerandhasaskedforeuthanasia(安乐死).
Themainreadersofmedicaljournalsare______.Howmanymajortypesofarticlesarementionedinthepassage?
WelearnfromthefirstparagraphthatlaughterWhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrueoflaughter,accordingtothepas
KobeBryantAfter10seasonswearingtheNo.8onhisback,KobeBryantwillbecomeNo.24nextseason.Thereasonforthes
HowOneSimpleMovementCanLetSliptheSecretsoftheMindBodylanguageisthequiet,secretandmostpowerfullanguageo
Thefitnessmovementthatbeganinthelate1960sandearly1970scentered(31)aerobicexercise.Millionsofindividualsbecame
Thefitnessmovementthatbeganinthelate1960sandearly1970scentered(31)aerobicexercise.Millionsofindividualsbecame
Whatis"busbunching"?
随机试题
下列关于测绘合同的说法错误的是()。
工程项目设计概算的编制依据包括()
基金赎回的时间为基金合同生效日后不超过()个月。
我国公司法规定,监事会一年至少召开()次会议。
中学生晓波通过物理实验发现,钟表的摆动幅度不取决于钟摆的材料或重量,而是取决于钟摆的长度。根据皮亚杰的认知发展阶段理论,晓波的认知发展水平已达到()。
下列名言与作者的对应关系不正确的一项是()。
长期耐力性训练导致心率减慢,其机制是由于心迷走神经紧张性增强。
1931年初,土地革命中的阶级路线的内容有
已知某教务管理系统的设计人员在需求分析阶段收集到下列原始数据表格:已知该业务系统存在如下规则:I.每个教师有唯一的教师号,每个教师号对应唯一的一名教师;II.每门课程有唯一的课程号,每个课程号对应唯一的一门课程;III.每本教材有唯一的教材号,每
目前,进行电子商务最常用的终端是______。
最新回复
(
0
)