首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
admin
2013-10-17
57
问题
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most
All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re also the only way to pick a school. I’ve heard those exact words dozens of times and inferred their sentiment hundreds more. They undoubtedly were a major contributing factor in the 250,000 applications to the top colleges this past year. With only 14, 000 chances available, there will be a lot of disappointed families when decisions are announced in a few days. For 30 years, I’ve co-authored bestselling books and provocative articles about how to improve one’s chances of being accepted at a "top" college.
The first edition of our book Getting In ! revealed what went on behind the admission committees’ closed doors, and introduced the concepts of packaging and positioning to the college-application vocabulary. The newest edition adapts the same principles to the digital age. But the core message remains: good colleges are not looking for the well-rounded kid—they’re looking to put together the well-rounded class.
What were revelations in 1983 are common knowledge today—at least among college-bound students, parents, and counselors. They also don’t have to be told that the odds of getting into a "highly selective" school are ridiculously low. Brown and Dartmouth will each accept about 9 percent of applicants; Cornell, Northwestern, and Georgetown about 16 percent. And Harvard, Yale, and Stanford? Forget about it: less than 7 percent!
Wanting to attend a "name" school isn’t illogical. And there is nothing illogical in parents wanting a better return on their investment. A college’s brand value—whether that school’s name will be recognized and open employers’ door.
Colleges, counselors, and parents talk a lot about finding the right "fit" between a school and a student. In reality, the process is dominated by reputation.
The problem is that college reputations have been controlled by rankings. Far too many " highly ranked" colleges are gaming the rankings and trying to attract more and more applicants—when the particular college is actually a poor "fit" for many of the kids applying. Colleges want to attract and reject more kids because that "selectivity" improves the institution’s ranking.
College presidents publicly complain there are too many college rankings. Privately, they admit they have to provide the data that feed that maw(大胃口). They can’t afford to be left off a rankings list.
The real losers in this system are students and their parents. A bad fit is costly, not just in dollars, but in time, energy, and psychological well-being.
The emphasis should be on finding the right fit. But finding the right fit is not easy. Subjective guidebooks like Edward Fiske’s—originally titled The New York Times Selective Guide to Colleges—are very useful and consciously do not include rankings. Ted changed his three-category rating system to make it more difficult to simply add " stars" and rank-list colleges. Even families who can afford to visit lots of colleges and endure the backward-walking tours find that campus personalities soon blur in their memory.
Thus it is not surprising that anxious, busy parents turn to rankings for shorthand comfort. Unfortunately, the data that U. S. News and other media companies are collecting are largely irrelevant. As a result, the rankings they generate are not meaningless, just misleading.
Some examples: U. S. News places a good deal of emphasis on the percentage of faculty who hold a "terminal degree"—typically a Ph. D. Unfortunately, a terminal degree does not correlate(相关的)in any way with whether that professor is a good teacher. It also doesn’t improve that professor’s accessibility to students. In fact, there is usually such a correlation: the more senior the professor, the less time they have for undergraduates.
U. S. News’ second most heavily weighted factor—after a college’s six-year graduation rate—is a peer assessment of colleges by college presidents and admissions deans. You read that right; administrators are asked to evaluate colleges that are competitive with their own school. If not an complete conflict of interest, this measure is highly suspect.
Even some seemingly reasonable "inputs" are often meaningless. U. S. News heavily weights the number of classes with fewer than 20 students. But small classes are like comfort food: it is what high-school kids are familiar with. They have never sat in a large lecture hall with a very interesting speaker. So it is not something they could look forward or value.
While most rankings suffer from major problems in criteria(标准)and inputs, the biggest problem is simpler; all the ranking systems use weightings that reflect the editors’ personal biases. Very simply, some editors’ priorities are undoubtedly going be different from what is important to me. Assuredly, my preferences are different from my kids’. And both will differ markedly from our neighbors’ objectives.
Colleges say they truly want to attract kids for whom the school will be a good fit. To make good on that promise, colleges need to provide families with insight, not just information; and they need to focus on outputs, not just inputs. Collecting and sharing four sets of very different data would be a good start;Better insight into the quality of education a student will get on that campus. Colleges need to share the exam scores for all students applying to medical school, law school, business school, and graduate programs. These tests reflect not just the ability of the kids who’ve gone to that college, but what they’ve learned in the three-plus years they’ve attended.Colleges need to assess a campus’ "happiness" coefficient(系数). A happy campus is a more productive learning environment; and one that has a lower incidence of alcohol and drug abuse.The full debt that families incur(招致); not just student debt.The salaries of graduates one, five, and 10 years after graduation.
A fifth useful metric is what employers—both nationally and regionally—think of graduates from particular colleges. Hiring preferences are a useful proxy(代表)for reputation.
The last piece in enabling families to find a better fit will come from entrepreneurs. Some smart " kid" will develop an online tool that will allow students and parents to take this new college-reported data and assign weighting factors to the characteristics that are important to them. The tool would then generate a customized ranking of colleges that reflects the family’s priorities—not some editor’s.
Colleges may complain about the rankings, but they are complicit(串通一气的)in keeping them. It is reminiscent(怀旧的)of the classic Claude Raines line in Casablanca; "I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!" If colleges really want kids for whom their college is a good fit, they will collect and publish the types of honest data that will give families a better basis for smart decisions.
According to the newest edition of the book Getting In\, good colleges hope to______.
选项
A、find the well-rounded kid
B、adapt to the digital age
C、keep the admissions selective
D、gather students for a well-rounded class
答案
D
解析
本题考查根据最新版的Getting In!所讲,好的大学希望做什么。定位句指出,好的大学不是在寻找多才多艺的孩子,他们希望能组建一个多才多艺的班级。D)是对原文的同义转述,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vSc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Internationalstudentsusuallysubmittranscriptswhenthey_________(申请进入)aU.S.university.
A、Theman’sgraduation.B、Thecouple’sengagement.C、Theman’ssmoking.D、Theman’sstress.C首先看题干。这一题的关键是弄清楚哪一个是主要的话题,题干已经给出暗示
A、DrAndersonagreeswithwhatthewomansays.B、It’suptothestudents.C、DrAndersonwillprobablynotgiveanopen-bookexam
TheBrazilianpartoftherainforestwillbewipedoutwithinthenexttwocenturies.Theinstitutionsthatshouldshoulderthe
Anewbookissuretobediscussed,and【B1】______,atcollegesthisfall.ThebookiscalledMyFreshmanYear:WhataProfessor
____________(不努力积累大量的词汇),youcan’texpecttogainagoodcommandoftheEnglishlanguage.
Wethinkitnecessary______.(让人们充分认识违反交通规则的危害)
A、Satisfied.B、Joyful.C、Patient.D、Discouraged.D观点态度题。男士问女士翻译工作进行得怎样了,女士说自已已经修改了一遍又一遍,不知道什么时候能完成。由此可知,女士的工作进展并不顺利。因此,四个选项中符合女士
三国公元220年开始的300年里,中国分成了三个小王国。一个是魏国,位于中国北部,由曹氏家族统治。还有一个王国叫作蜀汉,位于中国的西南部,由刘备统治。另外一个王国叫作吴国,位于中国的东南部,由孙权统治。中国文化里最伟大的书籍之一——《三国演义》就
少林功夫少林功夫是河南登封少林寺信奉佛教文化的和尚们练习的一种武术。少林寺,建于北魏太和十九年,是少林功夫发展的文化空间。少林功夫最初是佛教僧侣练习的,他们的职责是保护寺庙。现在经过1500多年的发展,少林功夫已逐步发展成为一种完美技术和丰富含义
随机试题
血中激素的浓度极低,但生理作用却非常明显,这是因为
治疗胆绞痛最好选用
菟丝子、沙苑子的共同功效是
现时中土地的使用、支配权要受到多方面的制约,其中政府的城市规划属于()方面的制约。
U有限责任公司有两位投资者,每人各出资20万元。两年后,为扩大经营规模,该公司打算吸收新的投资者,将注册资本增加到60万元。新投资者出资额为25万元,同时规定新投资者享有1/3的股份,对此会计应确认资本公积贷方为5万元。()
需要办理注销登记的情形包括( )。
2018年7月1日,人民法院裁定受理了甲公司的破产申请,并同时指定了管理人。在该破产案件中,存在下述情况:(1)2017年9月1日,甲公司与A公司签订买卖合同,甲公司从A公司处购买100万元的原材料。同日,双方签订一份抵押合同,甲公司以其机器设备向A公司
下列关于人力资源预测的说法不正确的是()。
1.在某文件夹中存有文档WD02A.DOC,其内容如下:[文档开始]高校科技实力排名由教委授权,uniranks.edu.cn网站(一个纯公益性网站)6月7日独家公布了1999年度全国高等学校科技统计数据和全国高校校办产业统计数据
Forlaymenethnologyisthemostinterestingofthebiologicalsciencesfortheveryreasonthatitconcernsanimalsintheirno
最新回复
(
0
)