首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly
admin
2015-01-09
28
问题
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly is a controversy that must be taught. "The Darwinists are bluffing, "he says over a plate of oysters at a downtown seafood restaurant. "They have the science of the steam engine era,and it’s not keeping up with the biology of the information age. "
Meyer hands me a recent issue of Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews with an article by Carl Woese.an eminent microbiologist at the University of Illinois. In it. Woese decries the failure of reductionist biology—the tendency to Jook at systems as merely the sum of their parts—to keep up with the developments of molecular biology. Meyer says the conclusion of Woese’s argument is that the Darwinian emperor has no clothes.
It’s a page out of the antievolution playbook: using evolutionary biology’s own literature against it, selectively quoting from the likes of Stephen Jay Gould to illustrate natural selection’s downfalls. The institute marshals Journal articles discussing evolution to provide policymakers with evidence of the raging controversy surrounding the issue.
Woese scoffs at Meyer’s claim when I call to ask him about the paper. "To say that my criticism of Darwinists says that evolutionists have no clothes,"Woese says, "is like saying that Einstein is criticizing Newton,therefore Newtonian physics is wrong". Debates about evolution’s mechanisms,he continues. don’t amount to challenges to the theory. And intelligent design "is not science. It makes no predictions and doesn’t offer any explanation whatsoever, except for’God did it’. "
Of course Meyer happily acknowledges that Woese is an ardent evolutionist. The institute doesn’t need to impress Woese or his peersjit can simply co-opt the vocabulary of science—"academic freedom. " "scientific objectivity,""teach the controversy"—and redirect it to a public trying to reconcile what ap-pear to be two contradictory scientific views. By appealing to a sense of fairness. ID finds a place at the political table,and by merely entering the debate it can claim victory. "We don’t need to win every argu-ment to be a success,"Meyer says,"We’re trying to validate a discussion that’s been long suppressed. "
This is precisely what happened in Ohio. "I’m not a PhD in biology, "says board member Michael Cochran. "But when I have X number of PhD experts telling me this, and X number telling me the opposite, the answer is probably somewhere between the two."
An exasperated Krauss claims that a truly representative debate would have had 10000 pro-evolution Scientists against two Discovery executives. "What these people want is for there to be a debate,"says Krauss. "People in the audience say,Hey,these people sound reasonable. They argue, ’people have different opinions, we should present those opinions in school.’That is nonsense. Some people have opinions that the Holocaust never happened, but we don’t teach that in history. "
Eventually, the Ohio board approved a standard mandating that students learn to "describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory. "Proclaiming victory, Johnson barnstormed Ohio churches soon after notifying congregations of a new, ID-friendly standard. In response, anxious board members added a clause stating that the standard "does not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design."Both sides claimed victory. A press release from IDNet trumpeted the mere inclusion of the phrase intelligent design,saying that "the implication of the statement is that the ’teaching or testing of intelligent design’is permitted. "Some pro-evolution scientists, meanwhile,say there’s nothing wrong with teaching students how to scrutinize theory. "I don’t have a problem with that," says Patricia Princehouse.a professor at Case Western Reserve and an outspoken opponent of ID."Critical analysis is exactly what scientists do."
What does the"exasperated Krauss"mean when he talks about the audience?
选项
A、He disagrees there should be a representative debate.
B、He stresses that what these people require is reasonable.
C、He insists that different opinions should be presented in school.
D、He rejects the idea that we should teach whatever is presented.
答案
D
解析
题目问:当考虑到观众时,“exasperated Krauss”是什么意思?通过倒数第二段内容可知,克劳斯说:这些人所希望的就是展开一场辩论,他们说,“人们有不同的观点,我们应该在学校里传授那些观点。这都是废话。一些人认为大屠杀从来没有发生过,但是我们在历史课上不讲这些。”据此判断,他的观点是:不是所有的观点都应该传授给学生。所以,答案是D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vWLO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【1】aboutdevelopment
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【1】aboutdevelopment
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【1】aboutdevelopment
Weneedonehundredmoresignaturesbeforewetakethe______tothegovernor.
Ifanymanheredoesnotagreewithme,heshould______hisownplanforimprovingthelivingconditionsofthesepeople.
Today,theTowerofLondonisoneofthemostpopulartourist【1】andattractso-verthreemillionvisitorsayear.Itwasoccasio
Today,theTowerofLondonisoneofthemostpopulartourist【1】andattractso-verthreemillionvisitorsayear.Itwasoccasio
IadmitIhavemadeamistake,______Idenytheseriousconsequenceitmayhave.
Seariseasaconsequenceofglobalwarmingwouldimmediatelythreatenthatlargefractionoftheglobelivingatsealevel.Nea
随机试题
柱塞气举是()气举的一种形式。
背景材料张山是一家跨国公司的销售人员,常驻沙特阿拉伯,跟当地客户的合作和关系都很好,私人关系也不错。有一次,他的亲人来到沙特阿拉伯看望他,带来了他非常喜欢吃的王中王猪肉火腿肠。他为了表示自己对客户的友谊,打算把这些火腿肠与当地合作伙伴进行分享。问题:
消风散中使用的养血活血药是
中等城市的工程质量监督费按受监理工程建筑安装工程量的()计收。
期货公司对外发布的广告宣传材料,应当自发布之日起5个T作日内报住所地的中国证监会派出机构备案。()
按照不同的发行标的,国债可以分为实物国债和货币国债。()
素质教育最突出的特点是()。
甲将自己的汽车抵押给乙,作价5万元,甲继续使用。结果甲开车时不小心将车撞坏。下列说法正确的是()。
在满足实体完整性约束的条件下
Heisexemptedfrommilitaryservice,becauseofhisbadsight.
最新回复
(
0
)