首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Students who are caught cheating during national exams could end up facing between three and seven years in prison, according to
Students who are caught cheating during national exams could end up facing between three and seven years in prison, according to
admin
2021-02-26
71
问题
Students who are caught cheating during national exams could end up facing between three and seven years in prison, according to an amendment to the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, which takes effect from Nov. 1st, 2015. Should exam cheaters be put into prison? Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your view on the issue.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
YES
All cheaters should be sentenced to jail because if they cheat on exams, they may also cheat while at work, or even worse, commit crimes, such as corruption, or using state funds for private purposes. Cheating on exams seems like a minor mistake, but it can reflect the poor moral character and the low degree of self-respect of the students who cheat. Punishing them severely can help them see that cheating gets them nowhere in life. They need to learn the value of hard work and should give up their fantasy of cheating in their later life.
If there is no strict punishment to the behavior of cheating, it will be extremely unfair to other students who have made great efforts for the examination. If a cheater can easily get away from punishment, then others may follow suit.
NO
Putting students in jail because of cheating on national exams is irrational. Cheating on exams does not indicate that these students are criminals or they have caused damages to society. The risk-takers can be punished in other ways, for example, retaking the exam, suspension, receiving moral education, and so on. Ending up in prison, however, is too cruel and will cause irreversible damage to the students’ whole life.
It is quite likely that students who cheat on exams make the mistake only on the spur of the moment. If they take a second thought, they will not cheat. Through education, exam cheaters will realize their mistakes and correct their deeds. If the young students are put into jail, it will totally ruin their future, and they will pay a heavy price for their misdeeds.
选项
答案
Exam Cheaters Should Not Go to Jail It is a frequently seen phenomenon that students, in middle school or in university, cheat on exams. How to prevent students from cheating becomes a thorny issue for teachers. The new regulation suggests that students who cheat on national exams should be sent to prison. Supporters consider this measure effective because they think that cheating may lead to dishonest behaviors in later life. However, some believe that such punishment is irrational for its severity and irreversible harm. As for my part, I oppose putting exam cheaters into jail. Firstly, if we catch a student cheating, our prior responsibility should be to educate him rather than punish him seriously. To this end, light punishment like losing all points in that exam and moral education can serve as both warning and medicine to cure the root causes of cheating. At the same time, by doing so we will give the cheaters a second chance to behave decently in their later life. Secondly, jail sentence has no benefit in helping cheaters realize their errors and show repentance: instead, it may cast a devastating shadow on the their future life. Cheating, in essence, is a mistake but not a crime. Those who cheat on exams may not necessarily cause damage to society, and some do it only out of spur or ignorance. If we put cheaters into jail, it will cause unnecessary side-effects. In conclusion, exam cheaters should be punished in an appropriate manner. Instead of putting them into jail, we should choose education as a more reasonable and effective way to help them.
解析
本题讨论学生在考试中作弊是否应该被判刑。在具体行文方面,考生应该首先总结材料,概述正反双方观点。然后给出自己的观点:作弊者不应该被判刑,并详细阐述理由。最后总结全文。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vvCK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Itiscommon.B、Itseldomhappens.C、Itonlyhappenstotravelers.D、Itisapleasantexperience.A本题考查人物观点。由句(6)可知,男士称迷路是经常发生
A、Becausehelackedworkingexperience.B、Becausehehadatightclassschedule.C、Becausethelocationsofthosefirmswereinc
A、Australia.B、Asia.C、Europe.D、America.A本题考查地点。由句(1)可知,男士曾经去过亚洲以及欧洲和美洲的大部分国家。对话没有提及澳洲,因此A为答案。
A.fatigueB.defectsC.perfectD.improveE.riseF.mistakesG.carefullyH.carelesslyI.ignoreJ.assignmentK.gr
A.fatigueB.defectsC.perfectD.improveE.riseF.mistakesG.carefullyH.carelesslyI.ignoreJ.assignmentK.gr
Therehasnotbeenagreatresponsetothesale,______?
A、Becausetheyareunawareofit.B、Becausetheyenjoyloudmusic.C、Becausetheyarenotlight-sniffsleepers.D、Becausetheyl
A、TheimportanceofChristmasgifts.B、Choosingrightgiftsforyourgirlfriend.C、Howtoestablishaseriousrelationshipwith
Theseareasrelyonagriculturealmost______,havingfewmineralresourcesandaminimumofindustrialdevelopment.
A.whereB.exceptionsC.affairsD.meetE.cracksonF.cracksupG.reachH.acclaimedI.seekforJ.failK.tiesL.
随机试题
WhatdoShoesCanDo?Researcherssaypeoplecan【C1】______(accurate)judge90percentofastranger’spersonalitybylookin
衡量外债风险的指标有()。
下列不属于监理工程师进度控制的任务是( )。
人力资源培训开发意味着对()的投资。
甲公司和乙公司签订买卖合同,甲公司向乙公司购入价值100万元的货物用于试制新产品,承诺3个月后付款。甲公司应乙公司的要求,请A公司和B公司作担保人。其中,A公司以自有的一套加工设备提供抵押担保,B公司提供保证担保。乙公司向甲公司按期供货后,甲公司为筹集资
对于学生来说,有的人观察能力强,有的人动手能力强,有的人善于口头演讲,有的人善于书面写作。这说明人的发展具有()。
共同富裕就是同步富裕。
100名男女运动员参加乒乓球单打淘汰赛,要产生男、女冠军各一名,则要安排单打赛:
侵占罪的犯罪对象包括( )。
常规
最新回复
(
0
)